• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Clipping the wings of non-competes

Last week the Government announced its latest in legislative proposals to grow the economy post-Brexit, curiously referred to in their paper as “Smarter regulation”. The use of the epithet “Smart” always leaves me rather troubled – think Smart motorways and Smart meters and you begin to catch my drift. One of the more eye-catching proposals is to legislate to apply a temporal limit of 3 months on non-compete clauses in employment contracts. On the face of it, this is a radical change as it unpicks at the fabric of common law on restraint of trade that dates back centuries to the days of master and servant.

There is little detail on the proposed legislation, but we do know that the intention is not to prohibit the use of non-solicitation restraints, paid notice periods or garden leave and that protections around confidentiality are intended to be unaffected. So why pick on non-competes? The disparate treatment of non-competes compared to its less intrusive cousins is not entirely out of the blue. In 2020, the Government put out to consultation proposals to ban such restraints or make them enforceable only by compensation being paid to the restrained employee. Also foreshadowed was a statutory limit on the length of these restraints.

The rationale for this time embargo is interesting. On the one hand, the Government hopes that up to 5 million workers will benefit by being given greater choice and freedom to switch jobs. On the other, for employers, it is asserted that the change will allow them to grow and increase their productivity by widening the available candidate talent pool.

I am sceptical that these objectives will be achieved if this reform comes to pass. In the genus of post-termination covenants, the non-compete has always been at the very top of the restraint hierarchy. Judges have always been most hostile towards a clause that seeks to prevent a former employee earning their daily crust, rather than, say, stop the tapping up of former clients or colleagues. It is axiomatic that any non-compete that is unreasonably wide in length or scope is bound to fail. Partly by reason of this, many employers have taken an unambitious approach when imposing these covenants on their senior staff. In the financial and professional service sectors, it is not uncommon for non-competes to be short in length (relative to other covenants) or sometimes altogether absent from employment contracts.  I therefore query if this change is going to make any real difference. I suspect that many employers that elected to use longer non-competes will adapt their contracts to extend notice periods and make greater use of garden leave, as these provisions have always attracted much less judicial challenge (but still need to be reasonable). This will, of course, cost employers more as they will be paying salary and benefits for longer. Similarly, employees that are eager to move on to a new shop will find that they are more firmly shackled if they are placed in the garden and kept employed and out of the market for longer. In any case, the workarounds for this change will be plentiful and not beyond the wit of any decent employment lawyer.

To be fair to the Government, the reform does seem well-intentioned and in step with proposed changes elsewhere. For example, in the US, the Federal Trade Commission is proposing to ban non-competes altogether (these can be up to 2 years in the US) based on similar ideological grounds to this Smarter regulation. Many commentators have also asked the question whether the reform will actually see the light of day. It is stated to come in “when Parliamentary time allows”. Many of the provisions of the Employment Bill in 2019 were similarly conditioned and have not been pursued with any great vigour by the Government since. What these four words mean is that there is no actual timetable and a (likely) Starmer Government may have different ideas – we shall see.

Our thinking

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • Religious Discrimination at Work: Protecting Religion & Beliefs

    Syma Spanjers

    Insights

  • People Management quotes Briony Richards on workplace monitoring and employee privacy

    Briony Richards

    In the Press

  • Avoiding Discriminatory Dismissal Claims

    Ben Smith

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Business School Inspire programme granted Institute Approved status by the Institute of Leadership

    Karen Stages

    News

  • Family rights changes

    Sara Wilson

    Insights

  • Syma Spanjers writes for People Management on flexibility around religious holiday requests

    Syma Spanjers

    In the Press

  • Adam Kyte and James Lamont write for Construction News on the crackdown of illegal working in the sector

    Adam Kyte

    In the Press

  • Expert Insights

    Michael Powner

    Insights

  • Sara Wilson and Izzie Beddard write for People Management on the 'right to switch off'

    Sara Wilson

    In the Press

  • Clash of Protected Rights in the Workplace

    Michael Powner

    Insights

  • Personnel Today quotes Vivienne Shirley on the Kristie Higgs religious discrimination case

    In the Press

  • Age Discrimination at work - How to promote anti discriminatory practice

    Ben Smith

    Insights

  • South West Business Insider quotes Sara Wilson on social media policies in the workplace

    Sara Wilson

    In the Press

  • Emily Chalkley writes for The Evening Standard on the Goldman Sachs equal pay settlement and potential for future claims

    Emily Chalkley

    In the Press

  • Employment Podcast: Sexual harassment in the workplace

    Sophie Rothwell

    Podcasts

  • Nick Hurley writes for City AM on the government’s plan to slash non-compete clauses

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • We asked ChatGPT about harnessing AI in the workplace – this is what it said

    Michael Powner

    Insights

  • Sexual harassment in the workplace

    Sophie Rothwell

    Insights

  • The Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act receives Royal Assent – but does it fail to consider the practical realities facing employers operating within the hospitality sector?

    Michael Powner

    Insights

  • Dubai announces its plan to streamline the enforcement of civil judgments and arbitral awards

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • UK Government announces consultation on calculating holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers

    Francesca Charlton

    Quick Reads

  • Right to work checks – an issue for both immigration and employment law and practice.

    Charlotte O'Connor

    Quick Reads

  • New industry group aims to build sustainability skills in the construction sector

    Carolyn Davies

    Quick Reads

  • Are workers entitled to the Bank Holiday off for the Queen’s Jubilee? Don’t bank on it!

    Sophie Clark

    Quick Reads

  • How to tackle a large Gender Pay Gap

    Emily Chalkley

    Quick Reads

  • New Employer and Landlord Digital ID Checks – A Good IDea?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Out of Office – 5 tips for employers considering a more flexible approach to where we work

    Sam Lawn

    Quick Reads

  • AI and HR - How can employers reduce the risks associated with using artificial intelligence to help manage their workforce?

    Briony Richards

    Quick Reads

  • The Tip of the Iceberg of Changes to a Modern Hospitality Industry? Hospitality staff entitled to keep all tips under new rules

    Sam Lawn

    Quick Reads

  • Flexible working requests: 5 tips for employers

    Quick Reads

  • Covid passports - are they workable or just a shambles?

    Harriet Lucas

    Quick Reads

  • Brace yourselves: dentists could be liable for actions of self-employed staff

    Quick Reads

  • Government to introduce duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment

    Nick Hurley

    Quick Reads

  • Do You Believe?

    Briony Richards

    Quick Reads

  • It’s all about the data…why has the government delayed hospitality reopening again?

    Michael Powner

    Quick Reads

  • Restaurants must keep innovating to survive the impact of another lockdown

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

  • UK Government considering a crackdown on unfair employment contract clauses

    Quick Reads

  • Towards a new RPI - good news or bad?

    Quick Reads

  • Feeling fine? New Covid-19 regulations impose financial sanctions on employers not following the rules.

    Quick Reads

Back to top