• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Use of biometric data and monitoring in the employment context

What is biometric data?

Biometric data means personal data resulting from specific technical processing relating to the physical, physiological or behavioural characteristics of a person which allow or confirm their unique identification.

Biometric data in the workplace

The use of biometric data in the employment context is a hot topic, given that the ICO has very recently issued an enforcement notice ordering a leisure centre operator to stop using facial recognition and fingerprint scanning technology to monitor workforce attendance, and it has also published guidance for organisations on how to process biometric data lawfully.

The enforcement notice was issued following an investigation that found that Serco Leisure had been unlawfully processing biometric data of more than 2,000 employees across its facilities by using it to check when they clocked in and out and making their cooperation with the same a requirement for them to get paid. Serco failed to give employees the option to cooperate by way of less intrusive means, such as ID cards or fobs, and therefore the ICO concluded that Serco had failed to show why the biometric technology was necessary or proportionate.  

Clear message from the Information Commissioner

The message to employers is clear: the regulator will closely scrutinise organisations and act decisively if it believes employees’ biometric data is being used unlawfully. There may be a crackdown as the UK Information Commissioner has said she is “deeply concerned” that live facial recognition may be used “inappropriately, excessively or even recklessly”. It is crucial that employers do not neglect to carefully consider their data protection obligations when implementing biometric technology to ensure compliance with underlying laws: because biometric data constitutes special category data of employees, its processing must be necessary, justified and proportionate and a condition under Article 9 of the GDPR must also be identified. There are 10 conditions; the most common conditions in the employment context are ‘employment, social security and social protection law’, (the defence of) ‘legal claims’ and ‘reasons of substantial public interest’.

Workplace monitoring under scrutiny

Aside from biometric data, monitoring in the workplace generally is subject to scrutiny. The ICO also issued specific guidance last year for employers on how to monitor workers lawfully, transparently and fairly. In summary, an employer can monitor its staff so long as it is justified and there is a lawful basis – but careful consideration should be given to employees’ rights to privacy and transparency is crucial. Employers sometimes think that an employees’ general consent to monitoring given by way of their employment contract will suffice, but it is not a get out of jail free card. Employees should be aware of what is being monitored and the reasons for the same so that they can give informed consent.

The use of CCTV and monitoring of instant-messenger communications are particularly prevalent by employers in the current climate: this can be helpful, for instance in the context of disciplinary investigations for evidence purposes, but employers must be careful to ensure the right balance is struck so that employees’ data is not processed for insidious means. All too often employers steam ahead without forethought for the potential ICO and GDPR implications; employers must remember to establish that the monitoring is justified and ensure that employees know they are being monitored, whether that be by way of being filmed, tracked, or having their communications observed, and why.

Conclusion

There is a very delicate balance to strike in order for an organisation to monitor its employees for genuinely legitimate business purposes whilst respecting individual rights. If you would like assistance navigating the thorny landscape of employee surveillance whilst minimising legal risks, please contact us. We are able to draft policies that strike the right balance as well as provide training and audit services.  

 

 

Our thinking

  • Ministry of Sound Limited v. The British Foreign Wharf Company Limited (and ors): Balancing terms of a renewal lease with redevelopment potential

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises FIRST and its shareholders on sale to Encore

    Mark Howard

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in HubBox

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Candy Kittens takes a bite as Unilever slims down

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025 – Inheritance Tax (IHT) and charitable gifts

    Richard Honey

    Insights

  • Advocacy: Lessons from The Mandela Brief for International Arbitration Today

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

  • The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on government plans to remove the cap on unfair dismissal claims

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Promises and probate: when is “detriment” worth the family farm and what happens when a promise is only relied on for a defined period?

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • Retail Showcase - Festive Special

    Events

  • Building Safety Lookahead: 2026 will see the reform of the BSR, introduction of the Building Safety Levy and more

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • Collateral warranties: Liability and equivalent rights and defences clauses

    Jane Burrows

    Insights

  • Bitter taxation pills to swallow, arguably all the more indigestible for those separating or divorcing

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • The “former matrimonial mansion” – how the new “mansion tax” could reshape divorce

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys' family team in the Court of Appeal on the meaning of "father"

    Sarah Higgins

    Quick Reads

  • What is a Family Investment Company (FIC)?

    Mary Perham

    Quick Reads

  • UK Autumn Budget: Five minute guide for residential property owners

    Simon Green

    Quick Reads

  • Higher Risk Buildings – Passing through Gateway 3

    Marie Randall

    Insights

  • Employee Ownership Trusts - Government reduces capital gains tax relief on employee ownership trusts in 2025 Budget

    Robert Birchall

    Insights

  • Budget 2025 – Changes to anti-avoidance for share exchanges and reorganisation rules – what this means for your transactions

    James Stewart

    Insights

  • The Guardian and The i quote Emily Chalkley on the UK government's U-turn on day one employment rights

    Emily Chalkley

    In the Press

Back to top