• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Use of biometric data and monitoring in the employment context

What is biometric data?

Biometric data means personal data resulting from specific technical processing relating to the physical, physiological or behavioural characteristics of a person which allow or confirm their unique identification.

Biometric data in the workplace

The use of biometric data in the employment context is a hot topic, given that the ICO has very recently issued an enforcement notice ordering a leisure centre operator to stop using facial recognition and fingerprint scanning technology to monitor workforce attendance, and it has also published guidance for organisations on how to process biometric data lawfully.

The enforcement notice was issued following an investigation that found that Serco Leisure had been unlawfully processing biometric data of more than 2,000 employees across its facilities by using it to check when they clocked in and out and making their cooperation with the same a requirement for them to get paid. Serco failed to give employees the option to cooperate by way of less intrusive means, such as ID cards or fobs, and therefore the ICO concluded that Serco had failed to show why the biometric technology was necessary or proportionate.  

Clear message from the Information Commissioner

The message to employers is clear: the regulator will closely scrutinise organisations and act decisively if it believes employees’ biometric data is being used unlawfully. There may be a crackdown as the UK Information Commissioner has said she is “deeply concerned” that live facial recognition may be used “inappropriately, excessively or even recklessly”. It is crucial that employers do not neglect to carefully consider their data protection obligations when implementing biometric technology to ensure compliance with underlying laws: because biometric data constitutes special category data of employees, its processing must be necessary, justified and proportionate and a condition under Article 9 of the GDPR must also be identified. There are 10 conditions; the most common conditions in the employment context are ‘employment, social security and social protection law’, (the defence of) ‘legal claims’ and ‘reasons of substantial public interest’.

Workplace monitoring under scrutiny

Aside from biometric data, monitoring in the workplace generally is subject to scrutiny. The ICO also issued specific guidance last year for employers on how to monitor workers lawfully, transparently and fairly. In summary, an employer can monitor its staff so long as it is justified and there is a lawful basis – but careful consideration should be given to employees’ rights to privacy and transparency is crucial. Employers sometimes think that an employees’ general consent to monitoring given by way of their employment contract will suffice, but it is not a get out of jail free card. Employees should be aware of what is being monitored and the reasons for the same so that they can give informed consent.

The use of CCTV and monitoring of instant-messenger communications are particularly prevalent by employers in the current climate: this can be helpful, for instance in the context of disciplinary investigations for evidence purposes, but employers must be careful to ensure the right balance is struck so that employees’ data is not processed for insidious means. All too often employers steam ahead without forethought for the potential ICO and GDPR implications; employers must remember to establish that the monitoring is justified and ensure that employees know they are being monitored, whether that be by way of being filmed, tracked, or having their communications observed, and why.

Conclusion

There is a very delicate balance to strike in order for an organisation to monitor its employees for genuinely legitimate business purposes whilst respecting individual rights. If you would like assistance navigating the thorny landscape of employee surveillance whilst minimising legal risks, please contact us. We are able to draft policies that strike the right balance as well as provide training and audit services.  

 

 

Our thinking

  • Modernising Business Tenancies: Where and how should disputes be heard?

    Andrew Ross

    Insights

  • Broker duties, lender liability and secret commission: broking bad

    Rebecca Hollinshead

    Insights

  • The Telegraph quotes Henry Fea on the changes to inheritance tax breaks and the likely impact on family farms in the fictional BBC radio drama 'The Archers'

    Henry Fea

    In the Press

  • Hydrogen Hurdles: navigating the path to net zero in the UK

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Joe Cohen and Aileen Johnson in a feature on ‘GenAI two years on’

    Joe Cohen

    In the Press

  • Navigating UK Financial Services Regulation: A Guide for Insolvency Practitioners

    Daniel Moore

    Insights

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on succession planning

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • An Overview of the Court of Arbitration for Sport

    Benoît Pasquier

    Insights

  • A company can claim privilege against its own shareholder

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • Radiotelevisione svizzera (RSI) interviews Sophie Dworetzsky on the UK non-dom tax changes and the appeal of Switzerland

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for Wealth Briefing on the assisted dying bill and lessons from financial abuse claims

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • A range of titles including the Financial Times, Daily Telegraph and The Times quote Claire Fallows on M&S receiving approval to demolish its flagship Oxford Street store

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Neurodiversity and the Law: Creating a Supportive Work Environment

    Briony Richards

    Insights

  • The EU Deforestation Regulation: an update and what it means for companies

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Computer says no [update] - border chaos delayed until April 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The New UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard 2024 – an ESG milestone?

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

  • The United Arab Emirates – Seeking Remedies for Financial Crime

    James Colautti

    Insights

  • Navigating Cross-Border Bankruptcy: The UK Supreme Court’s Judgment in Kireeva v Bedzhamov [2024] UKSC 39

    Bianca Venkata

    Insights

  • Adverse Possession of Land: Key Points for Landowners, Developers and those working in Strategic Land

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Tamasin Perkins on the assisted dying bill

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

Back to top