• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Bahrain Ultimate Beneficial Owner (“UBO”) Rules Take Effect

Background

The Kingdom of Bahrain continues to improve its standards of transparency with its ongoing commitment to ensure that the Kingdom is in line with international standards through implementation of a legislative framework that seeks to prevent the misuse of corporate vehicles and guard against money laundering, bribery and corruption, insider dealings, tax fraud, terrorist financing and other illegal activities.

In line with this initiative, the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Tourism (“MOICT”) recently issued Resolution No.83 of 2020 concerning the Standards, Requirements and Rules to Determine Ultimate Beneficiaries (the “Resolution”). The MOICT has also published additional clarifications in regard to the scope of the Resolution, including practical guidelines.  These clarifications are particularly important given the significant penalties for non-compliance. The Resolution only applies to natural or legal persons registered with the MOICT and holding a valid Commercial Registration (“CR”) (“Registered Entity”).  Entities licensed with the Central Bank of Bahrain do not fall within its purview.

Definition of UBOs

The Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”) definition of a beneficial owner (the FATF rules form the basis of the Resolution) is that of a natural person (or persons), who ultimately owns or controls a customer and/or the natural person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted. It also includes those persons who exercise ultimate effective control over a legal person or arrangement.

Article 3 of the Resolution sets out the following qualifying attributes of the UBO of a Registered Entity:

  1. Owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the Registered Entity’s capital or voting rights;
  2. Where the Registered Entity is a legal person owned by another legal person (or governed by a legal arrangement), the UBO is the natural person who is the ultimate owner within the chain of ownership and the person who exercises effective control over it;
  3. Holding influence and decision-making power over the Registered Entity, either directly or indirectly through other means such as personal communications or through participation in the financing of the project, a familial relationship, any contract, arrangement or understanding, or through a hierarchical entity (in the chain of ownership in regard to legal entities);
  4. Contributing to the financing of the Registered Entity’s business, its assets or the transactions made for the benefit of the Registered Entity, even if such contributions are hidden;
  5. Having direct or indirect control over the operations of the Registered Entity through a management agreement, power of attorney or similar legal instrument;
  6. Having effective ultimate control of the Registered Entity through a series of ownerships or other means of control, other than direct control;
  7. Exercising control through management positions within the Registered Entity so as to impact the strategic decisions, or influence the general direction of, the Registered Entity; and
  8. Any other conditions, criteria and rules as determined by the MOICT in accordance with best international practice in relation to the commitment to improve international tax compliance, anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism. 

The MOICT has also issued the following further clarifications regarding a qualifying UBO:

  1. Only a natural person qualifies as a UBO;
  2. The same natural person(s) may be the UBO(s) for more than one Registered Entity;
  3. Anyone can qualify as a UBO irrespective of age or nationality;
  4. A Registered Entity may have more than one UBO and the relevant information in respect of each UBO must be submitted to the MOICT; and
  5. Once submitted, a UBO’s information and supporting documents (the “Data”) shall be valid for a period of one year, following which a Registered Entity will be required to re-confirm or revise the information on an annual basis (or earlier if there is a change in the UBO or his/her information).

Submission of the Data

Submission of the required Data is completed through the MOICT’s online Sijilat portal. Registered Entities are required to login using their personalised e-key; the relevant UBO section can be found under the service menu whereby ‘ultimate beneficial owner – registration’ must be selected.

The Resolution sets out the following Data requirements in respect of each of its UBOs, which must be submitted by a Registered Entity:

  • Full name;
  • Passport number and a copy of the passport;
  • ID number and a copy of the ID;
  • Country of tax residence and tax identification number in the country of tax residence of the UBO (if applicable); and
  • Residential address, email and contact information.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

In the event that a Registered Entity fails to comply with the terms set out in the Resolution or submits incorrect Data, the MOICT may impose the following sanctions:

  • Suspend the Registered Entity’s CR or strike it from the commercial register; and/or
  • Impose an administrative fine not exceeding BHD 1,000 per day for a first time offence and BHD 2,000 per day thereafter for subsequent offences committed within three years from the date on which the previous notice of non-compliance was issued. The total fines shall not exceed BHD 50,000.

The maximum administrative fine in relation to all cases shall not exceed BHD 100,000.

Timeline for Submission and Next Steps

While a deadline for submission has not yet been imposed by the MOICT, in the absence of clarity we advise that Registered Entities currently holding a valid CR proceed with the submission of the requisite Data (in accordance with the process outlined above) without further delay, or risk facing the imposition of sanctions.

Registered Entities undergoing the registration process with the MOICT will need to submit the relevant UBO information together with the application for commercial registration.

Conclusion

In light of the influx of key reforms in the Kingdom of Bahrain, including the introduction of the Resolution and the new Economic Substance Regulations and Common Reporting Standards, it is increasingly important for businesses to review their corporate structure and clearly identify the UBOs of each entity in question.

Such information cannot merely be ascertained through a shallow analysis of the ultimate parent company’s share register, and businesses must instead conduct a thorough consideration of each UBO criteria as set out in the Resolution, thereby paying credence to the substance of a Registered Entity’s ownership and control structures rather than its form alone. In particular, the role of nominee shareholders and potential trustee arrangements ought to be carefully examined.

 

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys bolsters corporate and commercial offering with the appointment of Shirley Fu in Hong Kong

    Simon Green

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Give Back Beauty Group in the acquisition of INCC Parfums

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2024

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • Thomas Snider, Reem Faqihi and Dalal Alhouti discuss the impact of technology on the arbitration landscape for Legal Community MENA

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Countryside Partnerships on its joint venture with Abri to develop 1,500 homes in West Sussex

    Sarah Wigington

    News

  • Précisions sur le prix d’acquisition des titres souscrits en exercice de BSPCE : nouvelles perspectives pour les starts-ups en France?

    Raphaël Bagdassarian

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys boosts international private wealth offering with the arrival of Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    News

  • Breaking Barriers: The Tech Revolution in Arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Mark Howard writes for the Evening Standard on the blocked Telegraph takeover, the NSI Act and the Enterprise Act 2002

    Mark Howard

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • Family Offices for Middle Eastern Clients

    Elinor Boote

    Insights

  • The Lawyer covers the recent growth and strategy of our corporate practice

    David Collins

    In the Press

  • The role of national courts in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises on three secondary fundraises across three different markets

    Paul Arathoon

    News

  • Embracing AI's potential in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Thomas Snider, Patrick Gearon and Dalal Alhouti discuss the impact of AI on international arbitration for Legal Community MENA

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Les entreprises en difficulté ou en croissance peuvent-elle se passer des equity lines? Can distressed or growth companies do without hybrid bonds?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Danish tax authority wins "cum-ex" tax fraud case at the Supreme Court

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • Venture capital funds agree 'investment compact' to increase investment in UK high-growth companies

    Mike Barrington

    Quick Reads

  • Return to the full office week?

    Quick Reads

  • Is the opening up of Nexity's services division capital a consequence of the difficulties facing the French property sector?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • New Governance Guidelines for family-owned businesses in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Key figures gather to discuss the future of Gloucestershire

    Jonathan Morley

    Quick Reads

  • UK CMA's blocks Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a potentially significant decision for SMEs in the video gaming sector

    Quick Reads

  • Number crunching times

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • Updates to EMI Options in the Spring Budget 2023

    Quick Reads

  • VAT on fund management services

    Robert Birchall

    Quick Reads

  • Sign of the times - the British record football transfer which very nearly didn't happen

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Statement 2022: Very few surprises

    Robert Birchall

    Quick Reads

  • The Serious Fraud Office and the Crown Prosecution Service call for failure to prevent offences to be extended

    Quick Reads

  • Will construction see red or green today?

    David Savage

    Quick Reads

Back to top