• news-banner

    Expert Insights

COVID-19 and Business Interruption Insurance

On 5 March 2020, England declared COVID-19 a notifiable disease.  A spokesperson for the

Department of Health and Social Care said:

“This will help companies seek compensation through their insurance policies in the event of any cancellations they may have to make as a result of the spread of the virus.”

Business Interruption (‘BI’) policies could now offer a potential lifeline to businesses to claim losses flowing from COVID-19. This note explores whether typical BI policies will respond.

The nature of the policy

The critical question will concern the nature of the BI policy. The key is likely to be whether cover is limited to physical damage to property or whether cover is broader.

A Property Damage Policy

The reason many BI policies will not cover losses caused by anything other than physical damage is because BI policies are ordinarily purchased as extensions to property damage (‘PD’) policies. Cover under the BI policy is frequently tied to the cover provided under the PD policy by a ‘material damage proviso’.

Insurers will argue that COVID-19 does not harm property, and therefore that BI policies linked to physical property are unlikely to respond to the vast majority of revenue losses. That said, potential claimants may have valid counter-arguments to this line of reasoning. For example, many business premises have been forced to close in order for deep cleans to be undertaken following an employee becoming infected with, or suffering the symptoms of COVID-19. Closure has caused loss of revenue.

Whilst generally, to constitute physical damage, there has to be a physical change in the property, there have been successful arguments that property contaminated or overlaid by a dangerous substance has been damaged. Applying this to COVID-19, there is an argument that when premises are contaminated as above, the ‘material damage proviso’ is satisfied.

Policies Not Contingent On Property Damage

Insurance Policies which do not require property damage might also respond to COVID-19. The most common example is pure business interruption policies. Typically, these policies respond when certain specific circumstances are met. For example, coverage might be triggered where the insured is denied access to its premises because of a government order or because of the occurrence of a notifiable disease within a certain radius of the insured’s premises.  

The application of such triggers will not necessarily be straightforward and careful analysis is necessary. For example, some policies provide an exhaustive definition of notifiable diseases whilst others only provide non-exhaustive examples of relevant diseases. Each type of policy will be interpreted individually. Where non-exhaustive examples of relevant diseases are provided, arguments can be raised by policyholders that COVID-19 can be implied into the list given that it is a "notifiable disease". Where an exhaustive list of notifiable diseases includes SARS, policyholders may also be able to argue that SARS and COVID-19 are such close relatives that coverage for SARS extends to COVID-19. 

Conclusion

There can be no doubt that COVID-19 will have an unprecedented impact upon businesses and insurers. The impact may however not fall evenly. Businesses with identical cover may find that their policies respond differently, depending on precisely how their business interruption arises. Likewise, two businesses that suffer precisely the same interruption will find that cover varies depending upon what they have agreed with their insurers. There are also likely to be issues as to the period of indemnity (if any) and when it concludes. Each case will of course depend on the facts and on the terms agreed.

Policies often contain detailed provisions as to how losses are to be calculated or as to the supporting documents required. Even if such provisions are not expressly provided for within the policy, any insured should consider what evidence they have available to demonstrate the losses sustained and take steps to preserve that evidence very carefully.

Our thinking

  • LIIARC Tax Investigations Uncovered: Legal Tactics, Courtroom Trends & Strategic Remedies

    Caroline Greenwell

    Events

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Sifting the Rumours on Tax Rises and Reforms

    Charlotte Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Adjudication under the Construction Act – a case on the residential occupier exception and contesting the validity of a payless notice

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

  • VAT on Developer’s Biodiversity net gain (BNG) costs

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Princes’ float: a welcome listing, but the price says confidence is still scarce

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Understanding the Fire Safety (Residential Evacuation Plans) (England) Regulations 2025: The Living Sector

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Law Middle East quotes Thomas Snider and Dalal Alhouti on the UAE’s rise into the top five seats of arbitration in the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) International Court of Arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • Cross-border estates and the new “non-dom” regime: UK IHT reporting on death

    Harriet Betteridge

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for Family Office Magazine on the attractiveness of hotels as an asset class

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes David Savage on the latest round of administration statistics in the construction sector

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • What role can construction lawyers play in helping UK construction sector clients achieve greater success and how?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Harriet Betteridge writes for Tax Adviser on pensions and inheritance tax

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

  • Disputes Over Donuts: Mediation - An International Perspective

    Tamasin Perkins

    Podcasts

  • In-Depth Virtual Currency Regulation

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • The Pathfinder Pilot in practice – putting children back at the very heart of the Children Act

    Sarah Anticoni

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys further expands Intellectual Property offering with new Partner hire in London

    Stewart Hey

    News

  • Amendments to the Non-Contentious Probate Rules in force from today

    Jessie Davies

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands Corporate Tax and Incentives team with the appointment of Vadim Romanoff

    David Collins

    News

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • Installing Chinese Turbines in European Wind Projects – what do you need to know?

    Jue Jun Lu

    Insights

Back to top