• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Takeover Panel makes changes to the presumptions underlying when parties will be considered to be “acting in concert”

What is happening?

As of today, Monday 20 February 2023, the Takeover Panel (Panel) has effected certain changes to the circumstances in which the Takeover Code (Code) will presume that parties are acting in concert with each other because they have a significant degree of common interest. This follows a consultation paper published by the UK Takeover Code Committee on 26 May 2022 (PCP 2022/2), and a subsequent response statement on 14 December 2022 (RS 2022/2), confirming the changes which have been made.

The amendments are being implemented in order to codify existing Panel practice and provide more clarity to the market. However, the definition of 'acting in concert' (i.e. when parties will be treated as if they were a single person for the purposes of Code rules), is not itself being changed.

Key changes to the presumptions

The most important changes are being made to the current Code presumption (1) (i.e. that companies within a group structure are associated when there is ownership or control of 20% or more of the equity share capital of the company).

First, the presumption is being split into two:

  • new presumption (1): to presume a company to be acting in concert with any company which it “controls, is controlled by or is under the same control”; and
  • new presumption (2): to presume a company to be acting in concert with (i) any company in which it has a direct or indirect interest in 30% or more of the equity share capital (whether or not the shares carry voting rights) and (ii) any company presumed to be acting in concert with either of them under new presumption (1).

It is also important to note that:

  • the 20% threshold has been raised to 30%, to correspond with the threshold in the Code's definition of "control";
  • the presumptions clarify that they apply to (1) shares carrying voting rights (whether or not they are also equity share capital) and (2) equity share capital (whether or not the shares also carry voting rights); and
  • the presumptions apply to companies, but also now apply to funds, partnerships, trusts and any other legal or natural person.

Other changes include:

  • the former presumption (4) (that a fund manager is presumed to be acting in concert with a person whose funds the fund manager manages on a discretionary basis) has been removed; and
  • a new presumption (5) has been added stating that an investment manager of or investment adviser to, an offer or an investor in an offeror consortium or the offeree company, together with any person “controlling, controlled by or under the same control as” that investment manager or investment adviser, is presumed to be acting in concert with the bidder or target respectively.

Approach of the Panel

The general approach of the Panel is that the presumptions will apply absent compelling evidence to the contrary.  It will therefore not be sufficient to rebut a presumption by indicating that a party has no relationship with another party, as the Panel has said that the presumption itself establishes the relationship. A party will need to provide evidence and relevant facts for the Panel’s consideration in order to try and obtain a derogation from the presumption.

Significance of Changes

The concept of ‘acting in concert’ is extremely important as dealings in shares by anyone being a concert party with a bidder or target can have material consequences, particularly in relation to inadvertently triggering a mandatory bid obligation under Rule 9 of the Code.

Charles Crawshay, the Panel's Deputy Director General, recently remarked during a Panel presentation for market participants on 1 February 2023 that the principle of ‘acting in concert’ is fundamental to the operation of the Code, as without this principle, the provisions of the entirety of the Code could easily be circumvented.

Therefore, a careful analysis of the circumstances and facts at hand must be undertaken prior to any dealings in shares in companies to which the Code applies, so as to ensure that you are not in advertently ‘acting in concert’ or a concert party.

If you have any questions in relation to this topic, please contact Andrew Collins or Nia John directly. 

Our thinking

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys bolsters corporate and commercial offering with the appointment of Shirley Fu in Hong Kong

    Simon Green

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Give Back Beauty Group in the acquisition of INCC Parfums

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Countryside Partnerships on its joint venture with Abri to develop 1,500 homes in West Sussex

    Sarah Wigington

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys boosts international private wealth offering with the arrival of Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    News

  • Mark Howard writes for the Evening Standard on the blocked Telegraph takeover, the NSI Act and the Enterprise Act 2002

    Mark Howard

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • The Lawyer covers the recent growth and strategy of our corporate practice

    David Collins

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises on three secondary fundraises across three different markets

    Paul Arathoon

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Vitro on a major international restructuring project

    David Cordova Flores

    News

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charlie Ring and Ross Youngs write for FT Adviser on where wealth managers should look to for their own financial advice

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

  • Take-aways for UK firms from ESMA’s consultation on reverse solicitation

    Cheryl Tham

    Insights

  • Post-sale planning: The Maximisation and Protection of Private Wealth following a Business Sale or Exit Event

    Tabitha Collett

    Insights

  • Edward Robinson and Charlie Searle write for FT Adviser on key considerations when an individual inherits company shares

    Edward Robinson

    In the Press

  • Sifted quotes Victoria Younghusband on a boardroom disagreement involving Klarna and Sequoia Capital

    Victoria Younghusband

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Entrepreneurial Food Group on the sale of two food production businesses to The Compleat Food Group

    Hamish Perry

    News

  • The Global Legal Post quotes Mike Barrington on Tesco’s decision to sell its banking practice

    Mike Barrington

    In the Press

  • UK tax considerations for US persons relocating to the UK

    Matthew Radcliffe

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the management sellers of Membr on its sale to Xplor Technologies

    Andrew Clarke

    News

  • Les entreprises en difficulté ou en croissance peuvent-elle se passer des equity lines? Can distressed or growth companies do without hybrid bonds?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Venture capital funds agree 'investment compact' to increase investment in UK high-growth companies

    Mike Barrington

    Quick Reads

  • Is the opening up of Nexity's services division capital a consequence of the difficulties facing the French property sector?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • New Governance Guidelines for family-owned businesses in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Key figures gather to discuss the future of Gloucestershire

    Jonathan Morley

    Quick Reads

  • UK CMA's blocks Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a potentially significant decision for SMEs in the video gaming sector

    Quick Reads

  • Number crunching times

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • Sign of the times - the British record football transfer which very nearly didn't happen

    Quick Reads

  • Listing Rules changes are in...exciting times for founders and fast-growing companies

    Mark Howard

    Quick Reads

  • Overhaul of London's stock market listing regime set to significantly boost capital raising opportunities for founder led UK tech businesses

    Mark Howard

    Quick Reads

  • Ongoing supply chain crisis looms large over upcoming allergen law change

    Rory Partridge

    Quick Reads

  • B[re]aking up is never easy... a lesson from the Oetker business split

    Quick Reads

  • Brace yourselves: dentists could be liable for actions of self-employed staff

    Quick Reads

  • Private companies and public interest – a new approach to corporate governance?

    Quick Reads

  • Is now the optimal time to sell your company?

    Mark Howard

    Quick Reads

  • Dentistry - toothache ahead

    Quick Reads

Back to top