• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Inheritance contracts: An unknown planning tool for Brits with assets in Switzerland?

How one chooses to dispose of their estate after death usually requires careful consideration and lifetime planning. In particular, where assets are held in multiple jurisdictions (referred to here as cross-border estates) thought needs to be given to how to ensure that the estate administration and division of assets can be achieved in accordance with the wishes of the individual.

This article explores the Swiss and English law considerations of ‘inheritance contracts’, including what they are, why they are used, and in what circumstances they may be relevant.

What is an inheritance contract?

An inheritance contract (or pacte successoral; Erbvertrag) is a testamentary document often used in place of a will in Switzerland. The agreement can be made between two or more individuals for the purpose of confirming how and when the deceased’s assets will be distributed. Inheritance contracts are a well-known form of testamentary disposition in Switzerland but are not provided for under English law.

Formalities

Under Swiss law, any person over 18 can enter into an inheritance contract provided they have mental capacity to do so. The inheritance contract must be in writing and must be signed in front of a notary and in the presence of two witnesses. Unlike a will, the inheritance contract cannot be changed unilaterally. Any change must be made in the presence of a notary and with the agreement of all signatories.

The agreement can be terminated or amended by written agreement of all parties whereas unilateral termination is only possible in exceptional cases, for example where there is a justification for disinheriting one of the beneficiaries, or if one of the parties does not comply with a clause in the contract.

Statutory heirs

Switzerland is subject to a ‘forced heirship’ regime. This means that where Swiss law applies to a succession, the statutory heirs (broadly, a spouse and descendants) are entitled to a compulsory portion of the deceased’s estate. This limits the amount of an individual’s Swiss estate which can be freely disposed of by their will. Without an inheritance contract (or other testamentary disposition), a certain portion of the estate passes automatically to the heirs, with the remainder then being freely available. What percentage of the estate is left to be freely distributed in accordance with the deceased’s wishes (assuming they have left a valid will) depends on which heirs survive the deceased. An inheritance contract can bypass or delay the forced heirship rules by allowing an heir to renounce or delay the right to a specified portion of the estate which they would otherwise be entitled to.

English law, in contrast, broadly allows for testamentary freedom, meaning that a valid testamentary disposition (i.e. a will where English law applies to the succession) can dispose of a person’s whole estate however they choose, albeit this freedom can be challenged post-death in certain circumstances.

Inheritance contracts under Swiss law and English law

Whilst English law does not recognise a beneficiary’s ability to waive future rights of inheritance to a living person, an inheritance contract will still be recognised as a testamentary disposition if it is a valid testamentary disposition in accordance with the relevant private international law rules1. Therefore, in circumstances where an inheritance contract is made in accordance with, and therefore valid under Swiss law, it will likely be recognised as a testamentary disposition under English law.

Use of inheritance contracts in practice

Despite being unknown under English law, there are scenarios where a Swiss inheritance contract can be useful for UK resident individuals where, for example, they own Swiss real estate. Under English law, immovable property (i.e. real estate) is dealt with under the law of the country in which the property is located meaning that Swiss real estate would pass under forced heirship rules. An inheritance contract could be agreed between UK resident family members in scenarios where it is desirable (and agreeable between all parties) to leave the asset, for example, to a surviving spouse to enjoy during their lifetime, and then to the children or a child following the survivor’s death. The inheritance contract could also stipulate certain conditions, such as how any sale proceeds on a disposal of the asset should be treated or distributed. As an inheritance contract is unknown under English law, the relevant UK authorities will likely request confirmation that the contract is a valid testamentary disposition.

The options for UK national individuals who are resident in Switzerland are different. During their period of residency an individual may choose to make a will disposing of their Swiss assets and elect for the succession of those assets to be governed by English law (with the aim of benefiting from a greater degree of testamentary freedom). Without a valid choice of law election, succession of the Swiss assets would be subject to forced heirship. However, if the individual were to leave Switzerland, for example to move back to the UK, the English law election would no longer apply as a matter of Swiss law and succession of Swiss immovable property would be subject to the Swiss law of succession (i.e. the forced heirship rules). An inheritance contract could be a useful planning tool where a UK/Swiss national individual leaves Switzerland but retains Swiss real estate, which otherwise would become subject to forced heirship rules on their death.

Inheritance tax

Where the inheritance contract is a valid testamentary disposition in both Switzerland and the UK, property disposed of by an inheritance contract may form part of an individual’s English and/or Swiss estate on their death. Thought must therefore be given to the estate’s exposure to English and/or Swiss inheritance tax. We have provided separate commentary on Swiss/English cross-border inheritance tax implications here: Inheritance tax impact in cross-border estates.

Conclusion

Cross-border estate planning for Anglo-Swiss succession needs to be carefully considered and, as highlighted in the examples above, individual circumstances differ so effective planning should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Generally speaking, matters are more straightforward where a will and/or inheritance contract are considered at the same time. However, there are often circumstances where a will is already in place and foreign assets are subsequently acquired. It is important in these situations that the existing will is properly reviewed before deciding the appropriate next steps. As a firm with both UK and Swiss lawyers based in Switzerland, we are well suited to provide any necessary cross-border advice.

 

1 E.g., in accordance with the Convention of 5 October 1961 on the Conflicts of Laws Relating to the Form of Testamentary Dispositions. 

 

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Planning and Life Sciences: the challenges and opportunities in the Golden Triangle

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner and Sophie Rothwell write for Law360 on anti-bias protection

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Providing pro bono support on social housing issues

    Susan Field

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2024

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • London’s Knowledge Clusters: From Emerging to Maturing – Start Ups on the Global Stage?

    Lynsey Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Britain's most successful female Olympian has retired at 31, but how does the Family Court treat (early) retirement?

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • How the abolition of Multiple Dwellings Relief affects Build to Rent

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • It’s not just a High Court decision, it’s a successful M&S High Court Decision

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • 'Saltburn': How the Catton family could have protected the Saltburn estate and could Oliver's inheritance still be contested? (Part 2)

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • 'Saltburn': How the Catton family could have protected the Saltburn estate and could Oliver's inheritance still be contested? (Part 1)

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Beware of not obtaining a court order when settling your finances

    Julia Mauricio

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: when can an enforcement notice against an unlawful use also require the removal of related structures?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Vulnerable elders : a harrowing story and the lessons which need to be learnt

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill: Will new consumer protection rules restrict access to Gift Aid?

    Quick Reads

  • Home buyers and sellers hit by cyber-attack

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • International Relocation: The Parent Trap 25 years on ...

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Statement provides little comfort for farmers and landowners

    Hannah Connors

    Quick Reads

  • Top Tips to Building your Brand - Women in Chancery

    Katelyn Silver

    Quick Reads

Back to top