• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Available in other languages:

Swiss Annual General Meetings in the COVID-19 crisis: Q&A

Partner Olivier Cavadini and Tax Expert Laure Cordt-Møller consider key questions for companies on how to approach AGMs during the Covid crisis. 

1. How to organise an Annual General Meeting in this period when gatherings of more than 5 people are not permitted?

Olivier Cavadini: The Federal Council has introduced into Ordinance 2 COVID-19 a new Article 6b relating to the organisation and holding of AGMs. The Council has taken into account that protective measures in light of the current health crisis may make it difficult, if not impossible, for Swiss companies to organise their Annual General Meetings (AGMs).

This new article allows AGM organisers to require shareholders to exercise their voting rights in writing, electronically or through a representative. This will significantly ease the organisation of AGMs in the current situation and in respect of shareholders' rights.

It should be noted that for small and medium-sized companies, where the number of shareholders is often less than five, holding an AGM in the standard way, i.e. in the presence of the shareholders, remains possible, provided that security measures are respected (i.e. maintaining social distance), but is not compulsory.

This measure is effective until 10 May 2020, with a further update expected on that date.

It is important to bear in mind here that the 6-month time limit from the closing of accounts to hold an AGM remains in force, but that more up-to-date methods are being implemented to facilitate the holding of an AGM, where it is not possible to convene all the shareholders.

2. What is the time limit for notifying the shareholders of the AGM date and procedure?

Olivier Cavadini: The organiser of the AGM must comply with the notice periods provided for in the Articles of Association of the said company, i.e. 20 days as a general rule, but must inform shareholders no later than four days before the meeting is to be held that they will need to exercise their rights electronically or in writing, or through an independent representative. The shareholders must therefore have time to read the agenda and ask any questions they may have, in the absence of their physical presence at the meeting.

3. Our recommendations

Olivier Cavadini: The organisation of an AGM depends primarily on the number of shareholders to be convened. We would therefore say that for small and medium-sized companies with no more than five shareholders, a face-to-face meeting is entirely feasible, provided that distance measures are respected. For larger companies, we would obviously recommend using the solutions outlined in Ordinance 2 COVID-19 by requesting shareholders to vote in writing or electronically. The appointment of an independent representative by the Board of Directors is a very interesting and certainly effective way of bringing shareholders' voices together.

Finally, and on a more strategic level, we would recommend (for companies whose AGMs have not yet been held) to apply the principle of prudence, particularly with regard to dividend distribution. In light of the current situation and the commercial uncertainties, it would indeed be more prudent to keep reserves rather than to distribute them.

4. In terms of taxation, what should not be overlooked in relation to AGMs ?

 Laure Cordt-Møller : It is at Annual General Meetings that the distribution of dividends or reserves resulting from capital contributions are validated by the shareholders. These distributions require a declaration to the Federal Tax Administration, which is subject to a strict deadline, i.e. without the possibility of deferment.

For dividend distributions, a withholding tax declaration must be filled. Depending on the case, this dividend declaration does not generate a payment of tax (notably in the case of a payment to a company with a shareholding of more than 20%), but the declaration must be made within a strict time limit and using specific forms (F103/110/106/108). The deadline for filing the dividend declaration is 30 days following the dividend due date. If no due date is explicitly provided in the Minutes of the AGM, the date of the meeting itself is taken as the due date. We therefore recommend providing a due date that allows the company to meet its tax obligations without the risk of having to pay withholding tax, which can represent a significant financial burden.

For dividends paid to individual shareholders for example, the declaration of the dividend must also be filed within 30 days of the dividend due date and the payment of tax must also have been made. Any delay in payment will incur interest on arrears of 5%.

With regard to distributions from reserves resulting from capital contributions, it should be noted that they are not subject to withholding tax, but any change in this reserve (decrease or increase) must be announced to the Federal Administration (F170). In light of the current situation, the latter is relatively flexible with regard to the filing deadline, but it must nevertheless be respected as far as possible.

5. Our recommendations

The impact in terms of withholding tax can be very heavy for a company, particularly if the declaration procedure is refused or if the tax is paid late. We therefore recommend that the deadlines for filing the forms be respected and that the withholding tax paid on time. Unfortunately, we find that tax obligations are not always seen as a priority following the AGM. This should however become an automatic process.

In general, we also recommend great caution in distribution decisions. In these uncertain times, it is better to establish or maintain reserves than to spend them. Even if the forecast for the year 2020 cannot yet be precisely determined, a downward trend is more or less certain. It would therefore be wise to estimate results as best as possible and to request an adjustment of advance payments to avoid a large outgoing of cash when inflows of cash are more likely lower at present and in the weeks to come.

For any questions, please contact Olivier Cavadini (olivier.cavadini@crsblaw.com or +41 (0)22 591 18 44).

Our thinking

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys bolsters corporate and commercial offering with the appointment of Shirley Fu in Hong Kong

    Simon Green

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Give Back Beauty Group in the acquisition of INCC Parfums

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Why Switzerland is poised to become a prime jurisdiction for families to establish their private trust companies

    Dharshi Wijetunga

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Countryside Partnerships on its joint venture with Abri to develop 1,500 homes in West Sussex

    Sarah Wigington

    News

  • Précisions sur le prix d’acquisition des titres souscrits en exercice de BSPCE : nouvelles perspectives pour les starts-ups en France?

    Raphaël Bagdassarian

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys boosts international private wealth offering with the arrival of Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    News

  • Mark Howard writes for the Evening Standard on the blocked Telegraph takeover, the NSI Act and the Enterprise Act 2002

    Mark Howard

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • The Lawyer covers the recent growth and strategy of our corporate practice

    David Collins

    In the Press

  • The role of national courts in arbitration

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises on three secondary fundraises across three different markets

    Paul Arathoon

    News

  • New rules for non-doms: (Too) Short and Sweet?

    Alice Martin

    Insights

  • Drafting the “perfect” arbitration agreement

    Alim Khamis FCIArb

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Vitro on a major international restructuring project

    David Cordova Flores

    News

  • Property Patter: Spring Budget 2024

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Charlie Ring and Ross Youngs write for FT Adviser on where wealth managers should look to for their own financial advice

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

  • Take-aways for UK firms from ESMA’s consultation on reverse solicitation

    Cheryl Tham

    Insights

  • Post-sale planning: The Maximisation and Protection of Private Wealth following a Business Sale or Exit Event

    Tabitha Collett

    Insights

  • Les entreprises en difficulté ou en croissance peuvent-elle se passer des equity lines? Can distressed or growth companies do without hybrid bonds?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Danish tax authority wins "cum-ex" tax fraud case at the Supreme Court

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • Good news for users of the Madrid System

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Venture capital funds agree 'investment compact' to increase investment in UK high-growth companies

    Mike Barrington

    Quick Reads

  • Return to the full office week?

    Quick Reads

  • Is the opening up of Nexity's services division capital a consequence of the difficulties facing the French property sector?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • New Governance Guidelines for family-owned businesses in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Key figures gather to discuss the future of Gloucestershire

    Jonathan Morley

    Quick Reads

  • UK CMA's blocks Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a potentially significant decision for SMEs in the video gaming sector

    Quick Reads

  • UK immigration and international surrogacy update – will the Law Commission report change an aged system?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Number crunching times

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • Updates to EMI Options in the Spring Budget 2023

    Quick Reads

  • VAT on fund management services

    Robert Birchall

    Quick Reads

  • Sign of the times - the British record football transfer which very nearly didn't happen

    Quick Reads

Back to top