Dubai Family Business Law
The Government of Dubai issued Law No. 9 of 2020 Regulating Family-Owned Businesses in Dubai, on 13 August 2020 (the Law).
The Law is an important step forward to fill a gap in the governance of family businesses, and this note will look at why the Law is needed, what it does and its potential impact.
Background to the Law
Much of the UAE market is controlled by family businesses, and anyone doing business in Dubai will be familiar with the family names that have become powerhouses across various industries such as real estate, hospitality, construction, automotive and retail. Even looking beyond the large conglomerates, a substantial portion of SMEs in the country are family-owned businesses.
Historically, there has been no practicable legal framework that is specifically tailored to family-owned businesses. As a result, fractured and informal arrangements are frequently put in place to address the rights and obligations in these types of businesses, resulting in disorganised and incoherent structures. This can give rise to uncertainty and disputes over ownership, rights to income, management and succession. When these disputes spill over into the business, which they often do with family-owned businesses, it can interrupt daily operations, derail growth plans and deter third party investors.
The Law aims to provide a governance framework that is appropriate for family-owned property and businesses. It marks an important development that could help family businesses tidy up their internal structures to protect their businesses and the family’s stakeholders.
What the Law does
The Law recognises and legitimises the concept of a contract entered into between family members up to the fourth generation to govern the collective ownership, management and administration of family-owned wealth (the Family Property Contract and a party thereto will be referred to as a Partner). Families have previously sought to enter into private contracts or memoranda regarding family wealth and succession, yet the validity and enforceability of these arrangements have been questionable. The Law now provides a framework to ensure validity and enforceability of these types of arrangements.
The Family Property Contract can be entered into for all kinds of movable and immovable property, with the exception of shares in public joint stock companies. Provided that the Family Property Contract meets the six conditions set out in Article 6 of the law, which include notarising it before a notary public, the Family Property Contract will be valid.
The Law sets out the parameters for how to deal with matters such as management, disposal, succession and disputes in relation to the family property, which are briefly described below.
A manager should be appointed to manage the family property, and a Board of Directors may also be formed to oversee the family property and its management. The Law provides a degree of flexibility to tailor the management structure in the Family Property Contract.
The Law clarifies the status of heirs to Partners to the Family Property Contract. It confirms an heir’s right to adhere to the Family Property Contract, and their rights and obligations in relation to the family property.
The problem of third party claims to family property has been a key factor for many family businesses, and the Law includes protections against division or disposal of the family wealth that run contrary to the terms agreed by the Partners to the Family Property Contract. For instance, a Partner is not permitted to divide the family property while the Family Property Contract is valid.
In addition, disposals to any third party are subject to a right of first refusal held by the other Partners, and the consent of Partners owning at least 51% of the family property is also required.
The Law provides a mechanism for dealing with a Partner who becomes bankrupt or insolvent, and gives priority to the remaining Partners by permitting them to acquire the bankrupt or insolvent Partner’s share in the family property.
Importantly, disputes are referred to a committee that is formed by decision of His Highness the Ruler of Dubai specifically to settle disputes arising from Family Property Contracts.
There is a practical implication of the Law that should be kept in mind with respect to potential disputes, and that is that the Law only requires a 51% majority to terminate the Family Property Contract or to approve of the disposal of property to a third party. The Law does not state that Partners are free to set a higher threshold in the Family Property Contract, which means that critical decisions in relation to the family property can be effected even with a major split within the family (i.e. even if Partners owning 49% of the family property object to the termination or disposal to a third party).
The objective of the Law is to facilitate the smooth transition of family wealth between successive generations and ensure the continuity of family businesses. The question of succession and business continuity is an area of great concern for family-run businesses and anyone dealing with them, including commercial counterparties, employees and potential investors. The Law provides a framework for how to deal with this in a manner that promotes transparency between family members, and stability for the family business.
Further action will be required, however, and the Law calls for government agencies in Dubai to take measures necessary to effect the Law, including setting up commercial and real estate records with respect to family property. Establishing these records will be critical in eliminating uncertainty and disputes over family property, and the efficacy of the Law will, to a large extent, depend on the actions of Dubai’s government agencies in this respect.
We will continue to monitor developments with regard to the Law and provide updates accordingly.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
UK SPACs: could changes to the UK Listing Rules spark an increase?
SPAC listing popularity has increased. Could the UK be the next hotspot following proposed changes to the Listing Rules?
Liability for costs of repair (City of London v. Leaseholders of Great Arthur House)
Oliver Park writes an article for Lexis®PSL on a property dispute case.
Q&A on adverse possession
A successful application for title by adverse possession will result in the squatter acquiring possessory title to land.
Claire Fallows quoted by Planning on how new PD rights for commercial buildings will change the system
Councils should be prepared for a flurry of applications in August.
Oliver Park writes for LexisPSL Property Disputes on liability for costs of repair
Oliver considers the implications of the decision in City of London v Leaseholders of Great Arthur House.
Procuring modular housing: Is MMC becoming mainstream?
Is Modern Methods of Construction becoming mainstream? Read what it means for Development and Procurement here.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
The Lawyer, New Law Journal, International Adviser, CDR Magazine and eprivateclient report on the firm's partner promotions
Charles Russell Speechlys promoted five lawyers to partner, effective 1 May 2021.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
eprivateclient and Citywealth report on the hire of a new international tax team led by Robert Reymond
The firm strengthened its international wealth structuring capabilities with the hire of an international tax team led by Robert Reymond.
Rachel Warren quoted by Construction Law on the increasing pressure on the HSE over Covid deaths
The Health & Safety Executive is likely to face increasing pressure to take enforcement action where employees have died from Covid.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.