MP’s to Investigate the ‘Economic Impact’ of Music Streaming
Much to the delight of the music industry, the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (DCMS) announced on 15 October 2020 that an inquiry is to be launched into the economics of the music streaming industry.
The Context of the Inquiry
The inquiry appears set to examine the following aspects of the global music streaming industry:
- The ‘business models’ operated by music streaming service providers and whether, in their present state, they promote sustainability for the music industry at large;
- Whether the ‘algorithmic curation’ of playlists unfairly balances listenership figures in favour of more established artists; and
- How the Government can protect the industry from knock-on effects, such as the increased piracy of music.
Reading between the lines of the specific inquiries, the Committee appears primarily concerned with addressing the commonly referenced ‘value gap’ in the music industry.
The ‘value gap’ is the term used to illustrate the disparity between the revenue the music streaming giants generate and what the artists receive as royalties. To exemplify the disparity, the DCMS note that streaming giants such as Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and Google Play account for over 50% of the revenue of the global music industry and its contributors receive as little as 13% of this revenue. To flesh this out further on a localised scale, of the 114 billion music streams which took place in the UK last year, over £1 billion revenue was generated. Of this £1 billion revenue, Spotify is thought to pay its artists between £0.002 and £0.0038 per stream, with Apple Music paying around £0.0059.
The Contents of the Inquiry
As noted, the Committee have called for the submission of evidence on the following:
Dominant Business Models
The Committee seek submissions as to the dominant business models of the platforms that offer streaming, how these differ among competitors and whether there are alternative models available. With the Committee “hoping that the inquiry will show that a more equitable model is possible” it appears that the inquiry may begin with the presumption that the market presently adopts an inequitable position.
The Committee also seeks submissions as to whether the new features associated with streaming platforms, such as the algorithmic curation of music or company sponsored playlists, influences consumer habits and tastes. With the rise of company sponsored playlists such as those promoted by Gymshark (music for exercise) and KFC (which exclusively includes tracks which reference the fast-food chain) the Committee are concerned that despite these algorithms maximising income from streaming “they are a blunt tool to operate in a creative industry with emerging talent risking falling at the first hurdle”. Whilst as the listener we may at times be grateful for curated playlists, there is an inherent risk that our ears are being pointed away from newcomers to the industry and directed towards established artists with a consistent audience and marketability.
Aside from the intricacies of music streaming services, the Committee have also expressed their concerns with how the Government can protect the industry from any knock-on effects, such as the increased piracy of music and whether the UK needs an equivalent of the Copyright Directive in response. The Committee recognises that the piracy of music remains a large contributor towards the ‘value gap’.
In the short term, the inquiry looks to examine whether the ‘business models’ used by the music streaming giants inherently disadvantage the performers and writers that provide the streamed material. Longer term, the inquiry seeks to examine the implications of streaming on the music industry, including for artists, record labels, record shops, etc. The Musicians’ Union for one, welcomed the inquiry, particularly following concerns about the amplification of the ‘value gap’ throughout the COVID-19 pandemic with artists losing touring as their main revenue stream.
Deadline for submissions
The call for evidence by the Committee extends to all those involved in the music streaming industry such as industry experts, artists and record labels as well as streaming platforms themselves. Evidence is to be submitted by 6pm on Monday 16 November 2020 via the following link.
Sponsor Licence Compliance: Key considerations & how to be audit ready
Join us for the third in our series of mini webinars on post Brexit immigration about sponsor licence compliance.
UK SPACs: could changes to the UK Listing Rules spark an increase?
SPAC listing popularity has increased. Could the UK be the next hotspot following proposed changes to the Listing Rules?
Sustainable Investing: From ESG Integration to Impact Investing
We have a wide perspective on the range of issues that fall within the spectrum from ESG to impact investing.
Liability for costs of repair (City of London v. Leaseholders of Great Arthur House)
Oliver Park writes an article for Lexis®PSL on a property dispute case.
Data Protection: All roads lead back to the GDPR
Across the globe, jurisdictions continue to develop their data protection and privacy laws.
New tax on property developers - consultation paper published
The government published a consultation paper on the design of the new residential property developers tax.
Procuring modular housing: Is MMC becoming mainstream?
Is Modern Methods of Construction becoming mainstream? Read what it means for Development and Procurement here.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Music to our ears? Well, perhaps not for Apple.
A feud first began when the music streaming giant, Spotify, filed a complaint against music streaming provide rand competitor, Apple Inc.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.