• Who-we-are-banner

    News

Spotlight on using Pro Bono to respond to the climate crisis

According to the UN, humanity is now on a “code red” when it comes to climate change. This was the warning from the 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference that concluded climate change is now widespread, rapid and intensifying, with some trends already irreversible.

Given this consensus, it is incumbent on all law firms and lawyers to consider a climate-conscious approach to legal practice, including thinking about how to identify climate change risks, liabilities and potential greener courses of action. We first provided pro bono support to The Chancery Lane Project (TCLP) at its launch in 2019. In short, this is an industry initiative which helps lawyers to integrate climate change considerations into contracts. TCLP uses the power of pro bono to help drive sustainable behaviour in business and our communities.

TCLP is a collaborative initiative of lawyers and business leaders to develop template contract clauses that establish carbon reduction commitments in supply chains and in different sectors including property, construction, banking and finance, employment and corporate affairs. With 2030 just seven years away, TCLP’s mission is to use the power of contracts to deliver rapid decarbonisation at scale. By embedding clauses focused on carbon reduction into these contracts, the project aims to bring ever-growing climate concerns into the commercial sphere. As businesses contract with suppliers using these clauses, and those suppliers in turn contract with others, the focus on climate change multiplies across an ever-widening group.

We have committed to a 2030 net zero target and, having attended TCLP’s first Hackathon in November 2019, are an enthusiastic advocate and supporter of TCLP and its climate clauses. Alongside assisting with some initial drafting for their Climate Contract Playbook, which contains a collection of climate-conscious contract provisions and model laws, we have included adaptations of these clauses in some existing and long-term agreements with the Firm’s own suppliers. TCLP’s clauses have become a valuable resource at Charles Russell Speechlys and having facilitated internal presentations on TCLP’s clauses and how to use them, the TCLP resources are available for lawyers to use through the Firm’s drafting toolkits. They provide credible and reliable precedents for use in real-world contracts, allow for flexibility and can be adapted to what is best for our Firm and our clients’ climate ambitions and net zero commitments.

David Berry, Partner and General Counsel, is one of the leading lawyers in our work and has written a piece for TCLP on our partnership. “When negotiating supplier contracts, understanding their awareness and tailoring to their abilities to perform is essential whilst still setting challenging targets depending upon where the supplier is on the pathway to helping combat climate change,” he says. “Use of the TCLP toolkit is an excellent place for firms to either commence or continue their TCLP journeys, which, through increasing firm-wide awareness, open up new opportunities to use clauses in client work.”

Becky Annison, Director of Comms and Engagement at TCLP says “When you are seriously implementing carbon targets, you have to look at rewiring your agreements. This embeds climate solutions directly into commercial decision-making – because contracts are legally enforceable. That means there are consequences for failure. Our best-in-class climate clauses turn climate pledges into hard targets in the same way that contract terms do with pricing, delivery times and service specifications. You wouldn’t leave profit margins to chance and a handshake. It’s time we applied the same to carbon emissions.”

Learn more about the work of TCLP by signing up to their newsletter and if you are interested in hearing more about our Pro Bono Practice, please contact Sarah Farrelly.

Our thinking

  • CTBUH Annual Conference: Mastering ESG Challenges and the Launch of the Global In-House Counsel Assembly

    Kerry Stares

    Events

  • IBA Annual Conference 2024

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • International Arbitration Conference 2024 conference

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Removing A Trustee From a Trust

    Lydia Kember

    Insights

  • Benoît Pasquier and Alex Needham write for City AM on ensuring a more equitable future at the Olympic Games

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Oasis and the Often Overlooked Benefit of Dynamic Pricing

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Q&A: What evidence can establish boundaries?

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • Estates Gazette, New Civil Engineer and BE News quote David Savage on the Grenfell Phase 2 Inquiry report

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes James Souter on a legal case relating to Annington Properties and the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • Thomas Moran and Ruth Morris write for Prime Resi on the future of London's prime property market

    Thomas Moran

    In the Press

  • Budgeting for change: what should Landed Estates be doing before the Budget?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • FCA Consultations on prospectus regime

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • The Telegraph quotes Dominic Lawrance on anticipated tax changes and the impact on non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • “I object!” The use of non-objection clauses and confidentiality provisions in the context of Development Consent Order applications

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • Darren Bailey writes for City AM on the NFL’s decision to allow private equity investment

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

  • Relocation to Italy: Italian Lump Sum Tax Regime

    Nicola Saccardo

    Insights

  • App Fraud - where are we now?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Former F1 boss claims HSBC mis-sold ‘low-risk’ bond linked to high-risk property markets

    Joe Edwards

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Lauren Fraser on the case of A1 Properties (Sunderland) vs Tudor Studios RTM Company in the Supreme Court

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

Back to top