• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Top 5 tips for businesses to mitigate legal and regulatory risks associated with AI

Artificial intelligence is playing a pivotal role in today’s rapidly evolving business landscape. The development of generative AI, in particular, holds promise in revolutionising business operations. However, the potential for transformation is not without significant challenges.

In our AI Business Guide, we dissect the complex legal and regulatory risks that accompany the advancements in AI technology.

But what can businesses do to start mitigating those risks? Here are our top 5 tips:

1. Prepare and implement an AI acceptable use policy (AI AUP)

Your AI AUP should reflect what your organisation is, and is not, comfortable with when employees use AI tools in their roles. It should explain the guardrails in place to ensure that any use of AI is used responsibly, ethically and legally. But it’s also important that the policy is flexible so that it can reflect the changing regulatory landscape, evolving business needs and risk appetite. This could be done by establishing a list of prohibited and pre-approved types of AI in a “live list” that is updated periodically.

2. Embed an AI Risk Assessment Process (AI RAP)

An AI RAP should build on your organisations’ existing risk management processes to:

  • help identify how and where regulatory, legal and ethical risks arise in the AI life cycle
  • identify possible controls to help reduce risk
  • identify when a data protection impact assessment may be required
  • assess the residual risk after appropriate controls have been implemented
  • ensure that AI risks are regularly reviewed

3. Ensure that the new and specific risks associated with AI are reflected in contracts

There are a plethora of contractual considerations that need to be taken into account when procuring or supplying an AI system, in particular regarding explainability, unlawful discrimination, data protection (especially important in relation to training data) and cybersecurity. Another very important consideration is how to address changes that will be required as a result of the EU AI Act (which has not yet been finalised and so still a moving feast) and any other applicable changes in law.

4. Ensure your Supplier Code of Conduct reflects the positions in your AI AUP

Accountability and governance are key components of the UK’s non-statutory, principles-based approach to AI. Therefore, ensuring that your supply chain uses AI in a responsible manner will help demonstrate good AI governance.

5. Increase AI literacy and training amongst your staff

Educate your employees on how AI works as well as how to identify AI risks and understand their personal responsibilities under the AI AUP. Whilst this will inevitably result in more queries for you from the business, it should help reduce overall risk and enable you to understand which areas of your organisations are most impacted by the rise in AI.

If you wish to delve deeper into the legal implications of AI, we invite you to explore our AI Business Guide. This resource is a collaborative effort, bringing together insights from experts across various practice areas within our firm to offer a holistic view of the intricate legal challenges posed by AI.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding AI, please get in touch.

Our thinking

  • CTBUH Annual Conference: Mastering ESG Challenges and the Launch of the Global In-House Counsel Assembly

    Kerry Stares

    Events

  • IBA Annual Conference 2024

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • International Arbitration Conference 2024 conference

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Removing A Trustee From a Trust

    Lydia Kember

    Insights

  • Benoît Pasquier and Alex Needham write for City AM on ensuring a more equitable future at the Olympic Games

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Oasis and the Often Overlooked Benefit of Dynamic Pricing

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Q&A: What evidence can establish boundaries?

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • Estates Gazette, New Civil Engineer and BE News quote David Savage on the Grenfell Phase 2 Inquiry report

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes James Souter on a legal case relating to Annington Properties and the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • Thomas Moran and Ruth Morris write for Prime Resi on the future of London's prime property market

    Thomas Moran

    In the Press

  • Budgeting for change: what should Landed Estates be doing before the Budget?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • FCA Consultations on prospectus regime

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • The Telegraph quotes Dominic Lawrance on anticipated tax changes and the impact on non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • “I object!” The use of non-objection clauses and confidentiality provisions in the context of Development Consent Order applications

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • Darren Bailey writes for City AM on the NFL’s decision to allow private equity investment

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

  • Relocation to Italy: Italian Lump Sum Tax Regime

    Nicola Saccardo

    Insights

  • App Fraud - where are we now?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Former F1 boss claims HSBC mis-sold ‘low-risk’ bond linked to high-risk property markets

    Joe Edwards

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Lauren Fraser on the case of A1 Properties (Sunderland) vs Tudor Studios RTM Company in the Supreme Court

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

Back to top