• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Top 5 tips for businesses to mitigate legal and regulatory risks associated with AI

Artificial intelligence is playing a pivotal role in today’s rapidly evolving business landscape. The development of generative AI, in particular, holds promise in revolutionising business operations. However, the potential for transformation is not without significant challenges.

In our AI Business Guide, we dissect the complex legal and regulatory risks that accompany the advancements in AI technology.

But what can businesses do to start mitigating those risks? Here are our top 5 tips:

1. Prepare and implement an AI acceptable use policy (AI AUP)

Your AI AUP should reflect what your organisation is, and is not, comfortable with when employees use AI tools in their roles. It should explain the guardrails in place to ensure that any use of AI is used responsibly, ethically and legally. But it’s also important that the policy is flexible so that it can reflect the changing regulatory landscape, evolving business needs and risk appetite. This could be done by establishing a list of prohibited and pre-approved types of AI in a “live list” that is updated periodically.

2. Embed an AI Risk Assessment Process (AI RAP)

An AI RAP should build on your organisations’ existing risk management processes to:

  • help identify how and where regulatory, legal and ethical risks arise in the AI life cycle
  • identify possible controls to help reduce risk
  • identify when a data protection impact assessment may be required
  • assess the residual risk after appropriate controls have been implemented
  • ensure that AI risks are regularly reviewed

3. Ensure that the new and specific risks associated with AI are reflected in contracts

There are a plethora of contractual considerations that need to be taken into account when procuring or supplying an AI system, in particular regarding explainability, unlawful discrimination, data protection (especially important in relation to training data) and cybersecurity. Another very important consideration is how to address changes that will be required as a result of the EU AI Act (which has not yet been finalised and so still a moving feast) and any other applicable changes in law.

4. Ensure your Supplier Code of Conduct reflects the positions in your AI AUP

Accountability and governance are key components of the UK’s non-statutory, principles-based approach to AI. Therefore, ensuring that your supply chain uses AI in a responsible manner will help demonstrate good AI governance.

5. Increase AI literacy and training amongst your staff

Educate your employees on how AI works as well as how to identify AI risks and understand their personal responsibilities under the AI AUP. Whilst this will inevitably result in more queries for you from the business, it should help reduce overall risk and enable you to understand which areas of your organisations are most impacted by the rise in AI.

If you wish to delve deeper into the legal implications of AI, we invite you to explore our AI Business Guide. This resource is a collaborative effort, bringing together insights from experts across various practice areas within our firm to offer a holistic view of the intricate legal challenges posed by AI.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding AI, please get in touch.

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Chandni Pandya contributes to an Estates Gazette Q&A on the modification of restrictive covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    In the Press

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Members of joint ventures cannot unilaterally bring proceedings on behalf of their joint venture unless specifically provided for by contract

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Understanding risk-based human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Commonhold: Best Supporting Tenure or Leading Role?

    Sarah Bradd

    Quick Reads

  • AI and Consumer Law: Transparency, Fairness and Emerging Regulation

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

Back to top