• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Top 5 tips for businesses to mitigate legal and regulatory risks associated with AI

min read

Artificial intelligence is playing a pivotal role in today’s rapidly evolving business landscape. The development of generative AI, in particular, holds promise in revolutionising business operations. However, the potential for transformation is not without significant challenges.

In our AI Business Guide, we dissect the complex legal and regulatory risks that accompany the advancements in AI technology.

But what can businesses do to start mitigating those risks? Here are our top 5 tips:

1. Prepare and implement an AI acceptable use policy (AI AUP)

Your AI AUP should reflect what your organisation is, and is not, comfortable with when employees use AI tools in their roles. It should explain the guardrails in place to ensure that any use of AI is used responsibly, ethically and legally. But it’s also important that the policy is flexible so that it can reflect the changing regulatory landscape, evolving business needs and risk appetite. This could be done by establishing a list of prohibited and pre-approved types of AI in a “live list” that is updated periodically.

2. Embed an AI Risk Assessment Process (AI RAP)

An AI RAP should build on your organisations’ existing risk management processes to:

  • help identify how and where regulatory, legal and ethical risks arise in the AI life cycle
  • identify possible controls to help reduce risk
  • identify when a data protection impact assessment may be required
  • assess the residual risk after appropriate controls have been implemented
  • ensure that AI risks are regularly reviewed

3. Ensure that the new and specific risks associated with AI are reflected in contracts

There are a plethora of contractual considerations that need to be taken into account when procuring or supplying an AI system, in particular regarding explainability, unlawful discrimination, data protection (especially important in relation to training data) and cybersecurity. Another very important consideration is how to address changes that will be required as a result of the EU AI Act (which has not yet been finalised and so still a moving feast) and any other applicable changes in law.

4. Ensure your Supplier Code of Conduct reflects the positions in your AI AUP

Accountability and governance are key components of the UK’s non-statutory, principles-based approach to AI. Therefore, ensuring that your supply chain uses AI in a responsible manner will help demonstrate good AI governance.

5. Increase AI literacy and training amongst your staff

Educate your employees on how AI works as well as how to identify AI risks and understand their personal responsibilities under the AI AUP. Whilst this will inevitably result in more queries for you from the business, it should help reduce overall risk and enable you to understand which areas of your organisations are most impacted by the rise in AI.

If you wish to delve deeper into the legal implications of AI, we invite you to explore our AI Business Guide. This resource is a collaborative effort, bringing together insights from experts across various practice areas within our firm to offer a holistic view of the intricate legal challenges posed by AI.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding AI, please get in touch.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Pay Up or We'll Tell All: The High Court's Firm Stance on Blackmail in Privacy Cases

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Infrastructure Projects - Take care when accessing land under statutory powers

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Fowl Play: Lessons from Lux Films Ltd v Fowler & Anor [2026] EWHC 963 (KB)

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Genuine Belief Is Not Enough: Supreme Court Confirms Section 172 Demands Good Faith in Conduct, Not Just Thought

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Family Offices want crypto – but who's helping them get there?

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain social audits: what they are, their limitations, and why they matter for human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitrating Construction Disputes – Comparing the ICC, LCIA, SIAC and SCCA Rules

    Christopher O'Brien

    Insights

    min read
Back to top