• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The Biodiversity Gain Modification Regulations – what has changed?

min read

Draft biodiversity net gain (BNG) regulations were published in November and, in readiness of 12 February 2024 (when mandatory BNG will come into effect for most planning applications), six statutory instruments have now come into force. 

Which BNG regulations have been amended?

The Biodiversity Gain (Town and Country Planning) (Modifications and Amendments) (England) Regulations 2024, (which provide for certain applications to be accompanied by BNG information and amend primary legislation in light of BNG requirements) were made in a slightly amended form to their draft. We highlight the key changes below.

  • The regulations provide clarity on phasing - confirming that a condition will be imposed such that no phase of development is to be begun unless a biodiversity gain plan for that phase has been submitted and approved.
  • Clarity is also provided in relation to s.73 development – a condition will be imposed confirming that no further development of a phase which has begun may be carried out unless a biodiversity gain plan has been submitted and approved. 
  • There is no requirement to submit a “strategy for meeting the biodiversity gain objective” (as had been envisaged in the draft regulations) but instead the regulations clarify what must be considered when determining if the biodiversity gain objective is met.
  • If activities are carried out on or after 30 January 2020 (other than with planning permission or as specified by regulations) which have resulted in a lower biodiversity value (BV) for the onsite habitat than otherwise would have been the case, pre-development BV is taken to be that immediately before the carrying out of the activities, and the regulations detail that applications must be accompanied by a completed biodiversity metric calculation showing the BV of the onsite habitat on the date immediately before any such activities.
  • The Government has effectively strengthened the mitigation hierarchy. Habitats are given a distinctiveness score in the BNG metric and the finalised regulations include an amended biodiversity gain hierarchy, such that there is now a specific requirement which applies where there is a distinctiveness score of four or more (rather than a score of six, per the draft) to avoid adverse effects or, if effects cannot be avoided, mitigate (with the requirement to compensate for adverse effects applying in all scenarios). This means that avoidance/mitigation effects now also apply to medium distinctiveness onsite habitats (and not just high distinctiveness habitats). 
  • There is a requirement for authorities, on any refusal of a biodiversity gain plan, to state clearly and precisely their reasoning for such a determination.

Which regulations remain unamended since their draft forms?

No changes were made to:

Therefore there’s no need to review these regulations afresh if you are already familiar with their draft forms (as summarised by our previous article). 

What next?

We still await an updated BNG Planning Practice Guidance, as well as an updated planning application form and a template biodiversity gain plan for phased development.

Our thinking

  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Court Determined Global Licence Determinations (Interim and Final): Cross Border Complexities

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • Key factors to understand when investing in a regulated business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Arise Capital Partners on its acquisition of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

    Keir Gordon

    News

    min read
  • Emoji on trial: Can a thumbs-up waive a rent increase?

    Harriet Durn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises BioMed Realty on two new lettings at the Babraham B960 Research Campus

    Lynsey Inglis

    News

    min read
  • Upward only rent review ban becomes law

    Sarah Keens

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Under Oath – Not Under Attack: A practical guide on how to give evidence in the Family Court

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Renters’ Rights Act 2025: Ready, set, go!

    Lauren Fraser

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Access to privileged company documents: shareholder rule abolished

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Limitation and unfair prejudice petitions: the legend of Zedra

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Five Fast Facts: Top 5 things to consider when preparing to sell a Financial Services business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
Back to top