• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The Biodiversity Gain Modification Regulations – what has changed?

Draft biodiversity net gain (BNG) regulations were published in November and, in readiness of 12 February 2024 (when mandatory BNG will come into effect for most planning applications), six statutory instruments have now come into force. 

Which BNG regulations have been amended?

The Biodiversity Gain (Town and Country Planning) (Modifications and Amendments) (England) Regulations 2024, (which provide for certain applications to be accompanied by BNG information and amend primary legislation in light of BNG requirements) were made in a slightly amended form to their draft. We highlight the key changes below.

  • The regulations provide clarity on phasing - confirming that a condition will be imposed such that no phase of development is to be begun unless a biodiversity gain plan for that phase has been submitted and approved.
  • Clarity is also provided in relation to s.73 development – a condition will be imposed confirming that no further development of a phase which has begun may be carried out unless a biodiversity gain plan has been submitted and approved. 
  • There is no requirement to submit a “strategy for meeting the biodiversity gain objective” (as had been envisaged in the draft regulations) but instead the regulations clarify what must be considered when determining if the biodiversity gain objective is met.
  • If activities are carried out on or after 30 January 2020 (other than with planning permission or as specified by regulations) which have resulted in a lower biodiversity value (BV) for the onsite habitat than otherwise would have been the case, pre-development BV is taken to be that immediately before the carrying out of the activities, and the regulations detail that applications must be accompanied by a completed biodiversity metric calculation showing the BV of the onsite habitat on the date immediately before any such activities.
  • The Government has effectively strengthened the mitigation hierarchy. Habitats are given a distinctiveness score in the BNG metric and the finalised regulations include an amended biodiversity gain hierarchy, such that there is now a specific requirement which applies where there is a distinctiveness score of four or more (rather than a score of six, per the draft) to avoid adverse effects or, if effects cannot be avoided, mitigate (with the requirement to compensate for adverse effects applying in all scenarios). This means that avoidance/mitigation effects now also apply to medium distinctiveness onsite habitats (and not just high distinctiveness habitats). 
  • There is a requirement for authorities, on any refusal of a biodiversity gain plan, to state clearly and precisely their reasoning for such a determination.

Which regulations remain unamended since their draft forms?

No changes were made to:

Therefore there’s no need to review these regulations afresh if you are already familiar with their draft forms (as summarised by our previous article). 

What next?

We still await an updated BNG Planning Practice Guidance, as well as an updated planning application form and a template biodiversity gain plan for phased development.

Our thinking

  • Striking the Balance: Working Effectively with In-House Counsel on Large Construction Disputes

    Alim Khamis FCIArb

    Events

  • “Keep It Loose”: Flexible Designs for the Life Sciences Sector

    Amelia Hamilton

    Insights

  • The Mail on Sunday quotes Dominic Lawrance on Reeves’s desire to impose inheritance tax on non-doms’ overseas assets

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Sunday Times quotes Julia Cox on the impact of potential capital gains tax rises on businesses and entrepreneurs

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Understanding APP Fraud: Legal Strategies & Protection

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the University of Strathclyde on the incorporation and establishment of its Bahrain Campus

    Gareth Mills

    News

  • Claudine Morgan and Mary Barrett write for New Law Journal on liability for costs on discontinuation

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

  • Simon Weil writes for Trusts & Trustees on cross-border philanthropy

    Simon Weil

    In the Press

  • Richard Ellis writes for Finextra on when Fintechs do and do not require FCA authorisation

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys maintains strong Tier 1 showing in Legal 500 UK Solicitors Rankings 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    News

  • Semiconductor Industry: Commercial & IP Considerations

    Rebecca Steer

    Insights

  • ITV News, The Guardian, City AM, The Daily Express and various other local titles quote Michael Powner on the Tips Act

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • The New UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard 2024 – piloting towards a brighter future?

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

  • Martyn’s Law / the Protect Duty: new Bill published

    Rory Partridge

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Sophie Dworetzsky on the potential watering down of Labour’s non-dom tax plans

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • The Banker quotes Victoria Younghusband on the appointment of Bettina Orlopp as Commerzbank's new CEO

    Victoria Younghusband

    In the Press

  • New vs Renew: the aftermath of the High Court judgment on the M&S development

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Joe Cohen comments on the Generative AI rollout at our Firm in an interview with Artificial Lawyer

    Joe Cohen

    In the Press

  • Bloomberg quotes Dominic Lawrance on the impact of phasing out the non-domicile tax status in the UK

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Caroline Greenwell on the UK’s APP fraud reimbursement plan

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

Back to top