• news-banner

    Expert Insights

What changes does the Levelling-Up and Regeneration Act 2023 make to heritage planning?

The Levelling-Up and Regeneration Act 2023 (LURA) introduces measures to put protection for more of England’s heritage assets on a statutory footing. The heritage provisions in the LURA require secondary legislation to be brought into effect.

Special Regard to Heritage Assets

Once the relevant provisions of the LURA are in force, scheduled monuments, registered parks and gardens, restricted area sites on/in the UK seabed and world heritage sites (all “relevant assets”), will enjoy statutory protection. 

When considering whether to grant planning permission for a development which affects a relevant asset or its setting, local planning authorities (LPAs) and the Secretary of State will be obliged to have ‘special regard’ to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the asset or its setting. 

Under national planning policy, LPAs already have a duty to take into account heritage assets (including relevant assets). However, a statutory obligation on LPAs to have “special regard” to such assets requires that significant weight is given to the protection and improvement of heritage assets.

Preserve / Enhance Listed Buildings

Furthermore, the LURA amends both the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Listed Buildings Act 1990 to require LPAs to "preserve or enhance" heritage assets (including relevant assets) when considering a planning application (as opposed to only preserving these assets). In practice, this mirrors the terminology of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which emphasises “the desirability of sustaining and enhancing” the significance of heritage assets.

Enforcement Powers

The LURA also amends the Listed Buildings Act 1990 by empowering LPAs to issue temporary stop notices where either works to a listed building are being undertaken without listed building consent or without complying with conditions in the listed building consent. An LPA may issue a temporary notice if, having considered the effect of the works on the character of the building as one of special architectural or historic interest, it finds that it is expedient that the works (or part of them) are stopped immediately. A LPA already has the power to issue temporary stop notices for breaches of planning control; in effect the LURA extends these powers to breaches of listed building control.

A temporary stop notice ensures an immediate halt to works that threaten the special architectural or historic character of a listed building. If a person fails to comply with a temporary stop notice, they may be found guilty of a criminal offence and will be liable for a fine (the amount of which will be determined by the court who must have regard to any financial benefit obtained or likely to be obtained).

Defences

Two statutory defences are available to individuals with an interest in the building. The first defence requires the person to show that they did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, of the existence of the temporary stop notice. Alternatively, the second defence requires the person to satisfy all of the following requirements:

  • That works to the building were urgently necessary in the interests of safety or health or for the preservation of the building;
  • That it was not practicable to secure safety or health or the preservation of the building by works of repair or works for affording temporary support or shelter;
  • That the works carried out were limited to the minimum measures immediately necessary; and
  • That notice in writing justifying in detail the carrying out of the works was given to the local planning authority as soon as reasonably practicable.

Compensation

A person with an interest in the building may be entitled to be paid compensation by the LPA for any loss or damage caused by the direct effect of the temporary stop notice, provided the claim is made within the prescribed time and manner. Compensation will only be available where either: 

(a)   The works specified in the notice do not comprise works to a listed building undertaken without listed building consent or without complying with conditions in a listed building consent; or 

(b)   A LPA withdraws the temporary stop notice (except in circumstances where a listed building consent has been granted authorising the work).

These provisions will mean that LPAs will consider carefully whether or not to serve a temporary stop notice.

Removal of compensation for building preservation notice

The LURA compels authorities to consult with the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (Historic England) before serving a building preservation notice. 

The LURA removes the right for those in England to claim compensation for loss or damage caused by service of building preservation notice (the right to compensation continues to exist for those in Wales). 

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Fiona Edmond writes for The Law Society Gazette on taking maternity leave as a Deputy Senior Partner

    Fiona Edmond

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Annie Green write for Employee Benefits on the impact of dropping the real living wage pledge

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Planning and Life Sciences: the challenges and opportunities in the Golden Triangle

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Update on delinked payments

    Jessica Jolleys

    Quick Reads

  • London’s Knowledge Clusters: From Emerging to Maturing – Start Ups on the Global Stage?

    Lynsey Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Is section 73B the answer to Hillside?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • It’s not just a High Court decision, it’s a successful M&S High Court Decision

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: when can an enforcement notice against an unlawful use also require the removal of related structures?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Good news for users of the Madrid System

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Michael Gove's announcement on transitional period for two staircase requirement for new residential buildings

    Melanie Hardingham

    Quick Reads

  • Navratri at Charles Russell Speechlys

    Arjun Thakrar

    Quick Reads

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

Back to top