• news-banner

    Expert Insights

What changes does the Levelling-Up and Regeneration Act 2023 make to heritage planning?

min read

The Levelling-Up and Regeneration Act 2023 (LURA) introduces measures to put protection for more of England’s heritage assets on a statutory footing. The heritage provisions in the LURA require secondary legislation to be brought into effect.

Special Regard to Heritage Assets

Once the relevant provisions of the LURA are in force, scheduled monuments, registered parks and gardens, restricted area sites on/in the UK seabed and world heritage sites (all “relevant assets”), will enjoy statutory protection. 

When considering whether to grant planning permission for a development which affects a relevant asset or its setting, local planning authorities (LPAs) and the Secretary of State will be obliged to have ‘special regard’ to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the asset or its setting. 

Under national planning policy, LPAs already have a duty to take into account heritage assets (including relevant assets). However, a statutory obligation on LPAs to have “special regard” to such assets requires that significant weight is given to the protection and improvement of heritage assets.

Preserve / Enhance Listed Buildings

Furthermore, the LURA amends both the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Listed Buildings Act 1990 to require LPAs to "preserve or enhance" heritage assets (including relevant assets) when considering a planning application (as opposed to only preserving these assets). In practice, this mirrors the terminology of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which emphasises “the desirability of sustaining and enhancing” the significance of heritage assets.

Enforcement Powers

The LURA also amends the Listed Buildings Act 1990 by empowering LPAs to issue temporary stop notices where either works to a listed building are being undertaken without listed building consent or without complying with conditions in the listed building consent. An LPA may issue a temporary notice if, having considered the effect of the works on the character of the building as one of special architectural or historic interest, it finds that it is expedient that the works (or part of them) are stopped immediately. A LPA already has the power to issue temporary stop notices for breaches of planning control; in effect the LURA extends these powers to breaches of listed building control.

A temporary stop notice ensures an immediate halt to works that threaten the special architectural or historic character of a listed building. If a person fails to comply with a temporary stop notice, they may be found guilty of a criminal offence and will be liable for a fine (the amount of which will be determined by the court who must have regard to any financial benefit obtained or likely to be obtained).

Defences

Two statutory defences are available to individuals with an interest in the building. The first defence requires the person to show that they did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, of the existence of the temporary stop notice. Alternatively, the second defence requires the person to satisfy all of the following requirements:

  • That works to the building were urgently necessary in the interests of safety or health or for the preservation of the building;
  • That it was not practicable to secure safety or health or the preservation of the building by works of repair or works for affording temporary support or shelter;
  • That the works carried out were limited to the minimum measures immediately necessary; and
  • That notice in writing justifying in detail the carrying out of the works was given to the local planning authority as soon as reasonably practicable.

Compensation

A person with an interest in the building may be entitled to be paid compensation by the LPA for any loss or damage caused by the direct effect of the temporary stop notice, provided the claim is made within the prescribed time and manner. Compensation will only be available where either: 

(a)   The works specified in the notice do not comprise works to a listed building undertaken without listed building consent or without complying with conditions in a listed building consent; or 

(b)   A LPA withdraws the temporary stop notice (except in circumstances where a listed building consent has been granted authorising the work).

These provisions will mean that LPAs will consider carefully whether or not to serve a temporary stop notice.

Removal of compensation for building preservation notice

The LURA compels authorities to consult with the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (Historic England) before serving a building preservation notice. 

The LURA removes the right for those in England to claim compensation for loss or damage caused by service of building preservation notice (the right to compensation continues to exist for those in Wales). 

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath features in the latest episode of the Non-Billable podcast

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

    min read
  • Private equity (PE): How Founders and Management Teams can protect themselves - it’s a marriage of convenience so make sure your pre-nup is watertight…

    Nadim Meer

    Insights

    min read
  • From Pilot to Nationwide Protection: New Powers to Protect Victims of Domestic Abuse

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top