• news-banner

    Expert Insights

ESG in real estate: reliable data and standardised frameworks critical to accurate reporting and longer-term success

It is increasingly acknowledged that for progress to be made in ESG practices, the real estate sector must take it seriously.  With real estate thought to be responsible for around 40% of global emissions and energy consumption, sustainability within the sector is key to the UK meeting its ESG targets.

Within this context, the role of reliable ESG reporting is critical; detailing the impact that a company’s activities have on the planet and identifying what progress they are making towards their ESG goals. 

The majority of UK private companies are not currently legally obliged to make ESG-related disclosures.  This has meant that, to-date, most ESG reporting has been on a voluntary basis.  However, with ESG law and regulation developing quickly, this position is expected to change.  New mandatory ESG reporting requirements will directly affect public and larger private companies and are designed to cascade through investment and supply chains, permeating the entire private sector. 

In addition to direct legislation, real estate companies are also experiencing growing pressures from the market to report on their ESG outputs.  Many real estate companies have made public ESG commitments and are under scrutiny to evidence their progress.  Investors, lenders, tenants and employees want to see that companies ‘walk the talk’ and accurate ESG reporting is central to this.  

Against this backdrop, there is growing pressure on all the sector to engage with ESG reporting.  There are, however, various challenges facing companies wanting to do so:

Navigating the reporting framework minefield

The ESG field is crowded and there are currently a wide range of different reporting frameworks and accreditations.  This can create uncertainty about what companies should be reporting against and how to do this.

Using an established ESG framework such as the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) can provide a structured evaluation of ESG factors. But some established frameworks might not be suited to a company’s business and therefore some companies prefer to create bespoke ESG frameworks or use more than one framework for their ESG reporting.

As different frameworks can lack standardisation, it can be extremely difficult to compare the reported results.  To tackle inconsistency, there is a real need for a reliable and standardised approach to ESG reporting across the real estate sector. 

Mind the ‘data gap’

Obtaining consistent and reliable building data is essential for real estate companies wanting to report on ESG across their portfolio.  Understanding how much energy a building is consuming is crucial and enables the company to benchmark and identify operational improvements. 

One of the main challenges for ESG reporting in the real estate sector is access to reliable data.  This is particularly true with older buildings and those where tenants are reluctant to share information relating to their energy usage.  Without access to this information – the ‘data gap’ – it is difficult to see how companies can accurately report on ESG. 

This highlights the need for collaboration between landlords and tenants.  The inclusion of ‘green lease’ clauses in leases can require tenants to share data with landlords and for the parties to work together to understand and improve the environmental performance of the building.  Green lease clauses or other similar commitments set out in a Memorandum of Understanding can be vital tools in addressing the ‘data gap’ challenge.  There is also growing demand for a regulatory requirement for tenants to authorise utility companies to share consumption data with landlords which could help bridge this gap significantly.. 

Technology can also be very useful in addressing this challenge.  A smart building management system is able to capture comprehensive and detailed building data as well as enable the optimisation of building systems which improves efficiency. 

ESG reporting as a business priority

Unlike financial reporting, ESG reporting is relatively new, and for many companies, it won’t form part of their general operations.  At a corporate level, there can be resistance to investment in the reporting tools and training needed for accurate ESG reporting, particularly when there are competing business priorities. 

ESG reporting is complex and can be both time-consuming and costly.  However, the pressure on real estate companies to be transparent about their ESG performance is growing.  With increasing transparency requirements, companies should take care to ensure the accuracy of the information they publish in their reporting to avoid accusations of ‘greenwashing’ which can have major reputational and financial implications. 

Whilst it remains to be seen exactly what level of ESG reporting real estate companies will be subject to in the future, the demands on companies to make disclosures are only expected to increase.  In this context, it is prudent for companies to prioritise it now to avoid behind left behind.


An edited version of this original article also appeared in Property Week.

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Charles Russell Speechlys continues to strengthen its Real Estate team with the hire of Nicholas Burt

    Nicholas Burt

    News

  • Fiona Edmond writes for The Law Society Gazette on taking maternity leave as a Deputy Senior Partner

    Fiona Edmond

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Annie Green write for Employee Benefits on the impact of dropping the real living wage pledge

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

Back to top