• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions extended until 30 September 2021

min read

The temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions brought in under the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (“CIGA”) are wider than originally envisaged when first announced by the government in April 2020 and have now been extended until 30 September 2021.

The restrictions initially related to the period 1 March 2020 – 30 September 2020 (referred to as the ‘relevant period’).  However, a number of extensions to the expiry of the relevant period have been announced by the government during the pandemic and it is now not due to expire until 30 September 2021 – although further extensions to this deadline have not been ruled out.

The restrictions provide that a creditor may not present a winding up petition during the relevant period unless it has reasonable grounds to believe that coronavirus has not had a financial effect on the debtor or the debtor would have been unable to pay its debts even if coronavirus had not had a financial effect on the debtor.

To protect a debtor company from the effects that even the presentation of a winding up petition has (even if it is subsequently dismissed), a new Insolvency Practice Direction was released which provided for the existence of petition to remain private until such time as a preliminary hearing has taken place to determine the outcome of the Coronavirus Test and the court has decided whether the matter will go forward.  This means that a petition will not appear on any public search of the register, reducing the risk of the company’s accounts being frozen by banks etc. You can read more about the privacy provisions here.

The key provisions within the temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions are that:

  1. No winding-up petitions are to be presented on or after 27 April 2020 which rely on an unpaid statutory demand served during the relevant period;
  2. No winding-up petitions are to be presented during the relevant period unless the creditor has reasonable grounds for believing that coronavirus has not had a financial effect on the company or that the company would have become unable to pay its debts even if coronavirus had not had a financial effect on the company. As to the meaning of “financial effect”, this is a low threshold. Coronavirus has a “financial effect” on a debtor company if the debtor’s financial position worsens as a result of, or for reasons relating to, coronavirus (referred to as the “Coronavirus Test”). 

Even before the CIGA came into force, the courts were acting within the spirit of the government’s proposals and dismissing petitions which failed the Coronavirus Test.  

The restrictions detailed above have been removed.  Please refer to our latest guidance in our March 2022 Quarter Day page which can be found here.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • The UAE's New Civil Code: Implications for Construction Contracts

    Maher Al Nashar

    Events

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • The Increased Expedited Procedure Threshold under the 2026 ICC Rules: What Does It Mean for Mid-Value Construction Disputes in the UAE?

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • A founder's guide to SAFEs: fast-tracking investment for UK technology start-ups

    Grace Hudson

    Insights

    min read
  • Practicalities of Property Management Seminar

    Events

    min read
  • Darren Bailey sits on the judging panel for City AM's Football Power List

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill: Where are we now?

    Lauren Fraser

    Insights

    min read
  • “A Fairer End to Relationships”: First Thoughts on the Government's Landmark Consultation

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Hutton contributes to Investors' Chronicle exploring the role of trusts in families' financial planning

    Charles Hutton

    In the Press

    min read
  • Robert Lundie Smith writes for WIPR on how enforced arbitration could fix a 'dysfunctional' global FRAND system

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Summer Transfer Window 2026: What Latin American footballers need to know about UK tax before signing with a Premier League Club

    Rafael Boccatto

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, as Liquidator of Awal Bank BSC(c) (In Liquidation), welcomes Bahraini Court judgment upholding liquidator’s rejection of US$2.8 billion of claims and confirming debts owing to Awal Bank of US$2.56 billion

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • “Watt’s mine is yours” - environmental data sharing considerations for office occupiers

    Pippa Clifford

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Top 5 things to consider when selling your Financial Services business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Dewdney William Drew comments in City AM on a trade mark infringement case by outdoor brand Patagonia

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

    min read
  • Can Contractors Resist Enforcement of an Adjudicator's Decision? Lessons from Kingsmead Homes v Laycock Mechanical Services [2025]

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

    min read
Back to top