• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions extended until 30 September 2021

The temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions brought in under the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (“CIGA”) are wider than originally envisaged when first announced by the government in April 2020 and have now been extended until 30 September 2021.

The restrictions initially related to the period 1 March 2020 – 30 September 2020 (referred to as the ‘relevant period’).  However, a number of extensions to the expiry of the relevant period have been announced by the government during the pandemic and it is now not due to expire until 30 September 2021 – although further extensions to this deadline have not been ruled out.

The restrictions provide that a creditor may not present a winding up petition during the relevant period unless it has reasonable grounds to believe that coronavirus has not had a financial effect on the debtor or the debtor would have been unable to pay its debts even if coronavirus had not had a financial effect on the debtor.

To protect a debtor company from the effects that even the presentation of a winding up petition has (even if it is subsequently dismissed), a new Insolvency Practice Direction was released which provided for the existence of petition to remain private until such time as a preliminary hearing has taken place to determine the outcome of the Coronavirus Test and the court has decided whether the matter will go forward.  This means that a petition will not appear on any public search of the register, reducing the risk of the company’s accounts being frozen by banks etc. You can read more about the privacy provisions here.

The key provisions within the temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions are that:

  1. No winding-up petitions are to be presented on or after 27 April 2020 which rely on an unpaid statutory demand served during the relevant period;
  2. No winding-up petitions are to be presented during the relevant period unless the creditor has reasonable grounds for believing that coronavirus has not had a financial effect on the company or that the company would have become unable to pay its debts even if coronavirus had not had a financial effect on the company. As to the meaning of “financial effect”, this is a low threshold. Coronavirus has a “financial effect” on a debtor company if the debtor’s financial position worsens as a result of, or for reasons relating to, coronavirus (referred to as the “Coronavirus Test”). 

Even before the CIGA came into force, the courts were acting within the spirit of the government’s proposals and dismissing petitions which failed the Coronavirus Test.  

The restrictions detailed above have been removed.  Please refer to our latest guidance in our March 2022 Quarter Day page which can be found here.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • Next Gen Rural Professionals Drinks Reception

    Events

  • Retail Collection – Episode 4: Caffé Nero – lessons from a life in retail management

    Michael Powner

    Podcasts

  • Beyond Gateway 2

    Mark Barley

    Insights

  • Dubai chocolate craze and related allergen concerns in the workplace

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • HR Magazine quotes Jamie Cartwright on the Dubai chocolate craze and related allergen concerns in the workplace

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • Business Assets in an English Divorce – How Can Parties Protect their Interests?

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Triple Play "Bid Fever": UK Tech's ability to scale and go global

    Mark Howard

    Quick Reads

  • The Future of AI and Copyright Regulation in the UK: The Data (Use and Access) Bill finally gets Lords approval in the UK

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • HM Land Registry's Digital Drive - Delays Persist but perhaps there is light at the end of the tunnel?

    Maisy-Jane Cook

    Quick Reads

  • Key aspects of the FCA’s PISCES Sourcebook

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Mike Barrington and Mary Perham write for Tax Adviser on what the proposed changes to business property relief mean for investors and entrepreneurs, and for their businesses

    Mike Barrington

    In the Press

  • Bloomberg quotes Catrin Harrison on the recent exodus of non-doms from the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    In the Press

  • Trusts and Matrimonial Disputes in England

    Tom Watts

    Insights

  • The Financial Times and Daily Mail quote Emma Humphreys on the impact of the UK Government's Spending Review on housebuilding targets

    Emma Humphreys

    In the Press

  • Alumni Drinks Reception

    Events

  • Consultation on Private International Law and Digital Assets Law Commission Proposes Landmark Reforms

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

  • Navigating International M&A Disputes: Insights and Strategies for 2025

    Stephen Burns

    Quick Reads

  • Bridging Differences: The Role of Mediation in Resolving Cross-Border Trust Disputes

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • Planning essentials case update: what changes can I make to my listed building?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

Back to top