• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions extended until 30 September 2021

min read

The temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions brought in under the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (“CIGA”) are wider than originally envisaged when first announced by the government in April 2020 and have now been extended until 30 September 2021.

The restrictions initially related to the period 1 March 2020 – 30 September 2020 (referred to as the ‘relevant period’).  However, a number of extensions to the expiry of the relevant period have been announced by the government during the pandemic and it is now not due to expire until 30 September 2021 – although further extensions to this deadline have not been ruled out.

The restrictions provide that a creditor may not present a winding up petition during the relevant period unless it has reasonable grounds to believe that coronavirus has not had a financial effect on the debtor or the debtor would have been unable to pay its debts even if coronavirus had not had a financial effect on the debtor.

To protect a debtor company from the effects that even the presentation of a winding up petition has (even if it is subsequently dismissed), a new Insolvency Practice Direction was released which provided for the existence of petition to remain private until such time as a preliminary hearing has taken place to determine the outcome of the Coronavirus Test and the court has decided whether the matter will go forward.  This means that a petition will not appear on any public search of the register, reducing the risk of the company’s accounts being frozen by banks etc. You can read more about the privacy provisions here.

The key provisions within the temporary restrictions on winding-up petitions are that:

  1. No winding-up petitions are to be presented on or after 27 April 2020 which rely on an unpaid statutory demand served during the relevant period;
  2. No winding-up petitions are to be presented during the relevant period unless the creditor has reasonable grounds for believing that coronavirus has not had a financial effect on the company or that the company would have become unable to pay its debts even if coronavirus had not had a financial effect on the company. As to the meaning of “financial effect”, this is a low threshold. Coronavirus has a “financial effect” on a debtor company if the debtor’s financial position worsens as a result of, or for reasons relating to, coronavirus (referred to as the “Coronavirus Test”). 

Even before the CIGA came into force, the courts were acting within the spirit of the government’s proposals and dismissing petitions which failed the Coronavirus Test.  

The restrictions detailed above have been removed.  Please refer to our latest guidance in our March 2022 Quarter Day page which can be found here.

Our thinking

  • Judgement Under Pressure: The General Counsel and In-House Counsel Role in the Built Environment

    Events

    min read
  • Greenwashing webinar

    Kerry Stares

    Events

    min read
  • HR Breakfast Club: The Employment Rights Act 2025: In Discussion with Matthew Taylor CBE, Chair of the new Fair Work Agency

    Nick Hurley

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 4-6

    Events

    min read
  • Kurt Rademacher comments in Eprivateclient regarding the possible impact of the US mid-term elections on UHNWIs

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys wins Private Client Law Firm – Ultra-High Net Worth 2026 at eprivateclient Excellence Awards

    Piers Master

    News

    min read
  • The Recognition of UK Grants of Probate in France

    Harriet Betteridge

    Insights

    min read
  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • The UK’s Expanded Bereavement Leave Rights

    Emily Chalkley

    Insights

    min read
  • The Silent Majority: Why Britain's Family Businesses Are the Overlooked Engine of AIM and the Main Market

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • My child is engaged – how do I raise the issue of a prenuptial agreement?

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted in two categories at Law.com British Legal Awards

    Lesley O’Leary

    News

    min read
  • What could the UK Government's proposed divorce law reforms mean for separating couples?

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes about the Building Safety Levy in Estates Gazette

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Julia Cox comments in Morningstar on potential CGT changes in the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

    min read
  • Vadim Romanoff and Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake consider the risks and rewards of digital assets for family offices in eprivateclient

    Vadim Romanoff

    In the Press

    min read
  • What Do Landlords Need to Know About the New ‘Register Your Rental Property’ Service?

    Lauren Fraser

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys achieves uplift in Tier 1 accolades in 2027 Legal 500 UK Rankings

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • The two staircase requirement in England

    Melanie Hardingham

    Insights

    min read
Back to top