• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Housing-with-care considered in first ever parliamentary debate

min read

The first ever formal parliamentary debate into housing-with-care was held on 1 July 2021, tabled by Jim Shannon MP. The debate focussed on the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on retirement communities, flagging the threat of serious illness, loss of social support and isolation to the elder community but also highlighting that retirement villages tended to be safer environments by offering residents the ability to self-isolate in their own homes whilst maintaining access to a network of support, supervision and social interaction which was not possible in other care settings.

The UK retirement village space is still a nascent market compared to other countries (only 0.6% of over-65s in the UK live in such facilities whereas in the US, New Zealand and Australia this figure is closer to 5% to 6%), but it has been rapidly growing in recent years driven by an increase in life expectancy and a shortage of suitable retirement accommodation.

The debate outlined three things needed to address this shortage of suitable retirement accommodation – (1) sector-specific legislation and regulation to set out residents’ rights and to define the nature of the relationship with care providers, so as to give greater long-term confidence to both consumers and investors; (2) clarity in the planning system as it is currently harder to build housing-with-care properties than traditional care homes due to a lack of definition in the planning system; and (3) funding options for affordable housing-with-care provision so that it is an option for all older people.

Jim Shannon MP said that the pandemic has redrawn the landscape for retirement communities and that the Government must take steps to fund later living accommodation to plan and prepare for the future. This does not mean that there are calls to move away entirely from traditional models of care homes or retirement living. As the Rt Hon Karen Bradley MP stressed, there has to be a full suite of facilities available so that the right facility is available for the right person. It is about having the right housing options available for retired people to stay independent for longer, continuing to live as part of a wider community in their own home, with the care they need easily accessible when needed.

The debate has marked a key milestone in the evolvement of this sector. The overarching theme from the debate is that there is a real opportunity for the retirement village model to form part of the Government’s plans to reform the social care system and address the housing crisis. There are mounting calls for a cross-Government taskforce to be established to look at this type of facility and for the Government to set out a clear roadmap for how it plans to support this sector during its expansion.

Charles Russell Speechlys has considerable expertise in the retirement living sector. If you would like more information, please contact Cara Fulker (Banking), Sarah Wigington (Corporate), Claire Fallows (Planning) or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Fowl Play: Lessons from Lux Films Ltd v Fowler & Anor [2026] EWHC 963 (KB)

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Genuine Belief Is Not Enough: Supreme Court Confirms Section 172 Demands Good Faith in Conduct, Not Just Thought

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Family Offices want crypto – but who's helping them get there?

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain social audits: what they are, their limitations, and why they matter for human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitrating Construction Disputes – Comparing the ICC, LCIA, SIAC and SCCA Rules

    Christopher O'Brien

    Insights

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
  • What last week’s Bank of England decision means for private capital stakeholders

    Philip Withey

    Insights

    min read
Back to top