• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Law commission reports signal significant changes to home ownership

The Law Commission has today released three reports spanning almost 2000 pages on enfranchisement, right to manage and commonhold. The Law Commission was tasked by the Government to carry out a review of the residential leasehold system with the specific purpose of creating a better deal for leaseholders as consumers. This has resulted in a dramatic recommendation by the Law Commission that the residential leasehold system should be replaced with commonhold. If the Government accepts this recommendation it would represent the biggest shake-up of home ownership in history. 

Commonhold has had very low take up since its introduction in 2004 due to its lack of appeal to investors and developers and the difficulties with converting existing leasehold properties to commonhold. The Law Commission has proposed significant changes to the commonhold system to address some of its most unattractive features, but more importantly, it has called on the Government to either incentivise the take up of commonhold or even to make it mandatory. 

The Law Commission maintains that commonhold provides greater control for home owners over service charges and major works. They are also unconvinced that professional freeholders provide a significantly higher level of service than that which would be provided by leaseholders themselves. The proposals would allow an existing leasehold building to convert to a commonhold system if just half of the leaseholders agree and without the requirement for consent from the freeholder. This raises an important point that whilst commonhold may provide answers to some of the problems identified by the Law Commission, it acknowledges that it is not a “complete solution” .  For example, it won’t remove the possibility of disputes between co-owners. 

Alongside the recommendations on commonhold, the Law Commission has made radical and sweeping proposals to reform leasehold enfranchisement and right to manage, by overhauling the procedures to make them quicker, simpler and more accessible to leaseholders. In particular, leaseholders may no longer be required to pay the landlord’s legal costs associated with these claims. This comes on the back of a previous Law Commission report (see our insight here) recommending ways in which the amounts payable by leaseholders for extending their leases or buying the freehold could be reduced. 

The proposals will require a significant amount of Government and Parliamentary time before legislation can be introduced and so will have to take their place in the queue behind more pressing matters. There are important political considerations here such as the current housing crisis and urgent need to build more new homes as well as the fact that with an estimated 4.3 million leaseholders in the country, there is significant political capital at play. Nevertheless, the Law Commission has signalled a clear direction of travel for the future of home ownership and we shall be watching developments closely.  

For more information and analysis about the Law Commission’s proposals, please click on our insights on our Essential Residential Hub below:

For more information, please do not hesitate to contact Lauren Fraser, Laura Bushaway or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • Radical reforms to fight economic crime: what should businesses do now?

    Rhys Novak


  • Q&A: Supreme Court finds for Danish tax authority

    Hugh Gunson


  • City AM quotes Eddie Richards on the logistical challenges of data centres

    Eddie Richards

    In the Press

  • What are the different ways to own a Hong Kong property? What is sole ownership and what are joint tenants and tenants-in-common?

    Ian Devereux


  • Claims for reasonable financial provision beyond the grave?

    Jennifer Doggett


  • Arbitration Rules – How Different Are They?

    Mazin Al Mardhi


  • What the cancellation of HS2 Phase 2 means for former landowners

    Richard Flenley


  • The status of transgender and intersex athletes in international sports federations

    Pierre Bydzovsky


  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Development Partners International and Verod Capital Management on investment into Pan African Towers

    Adrian Mayer


  • Overview of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill: What are the key provisions?

    Laura Bushaway


  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on business succession plans

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Talking Retail quotes Jamie Cartwright on the CMA's report on grocery price inflation

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes Claire Fallows on reforms to the planning system announced in the Autumn Statement

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Francesca Charlton and Kayleigh McKee write for People Management on the Worker Protection Act

    Francesca Charlton

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys successfully advises the Joint Liquidators of LB GP No.1 Ltd in Lehman Brothers litigation before the High Court in London

    Daniel Moore


  • Q&A: Adverse possession

    Hope Barton


  • FT Wealth quotes Sarah Anticoni and Vanessa Duff on prenups to protect family wealth

    Sarah Anticoni

    In the Press

  • Caroline Swain writes for Startups Magazine on 'Green Claims'

    Caroline Swain

    In the Press

  • Briefing quotes Noni Garratt-Wall and Sarah Grant on Building our Brand

    In the Press

  • The i quotes Rose Carey on UK net migration figures

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

Back to top