• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Law commission reports signal significant changes to home ownership

The Law Commission has today released three reports spanning almost 2000 pages on enfranchisement, right to manage and commonhold. The Law Commission was tasked by the Government to carry out a review of the residential leasehold system with the specific purpose of creating a better deal for leaseholders as consumers. This has resulted in a dramatic recommendation by the Law Commission that the residential leasehold system should be replaced with commonhold. If the Government accepts this recommendation it would represent the biggest shake-up of home ownership in history. 

Commonhold has had very low take up since its introduction in 2004 due to its lack of appeal to investors and developers and the difficulties with converting existing leasehold properties to commonhold. The Law Commission has proposed significant changes to the commonhold system to address some of its most unattractive features, but more importantly, it has called on the Government to either incentivise the take up of commonhold or even to make it mandatory. 

The Law Commission maintains that commonhold provides greater control for home owners over service charges and major works. They are also unconvinced that professional freeholders provide a significantly higher level of service than that which would be provided by leaseholders themselves. The proposals would allow an existing leasehold building to convert to a commonhold system if just half of the leaseholders agree and without the requirement for consent from the freeholder. This raises an important point that whilst commonhold may provide answers to some of the problems identified by the Law Commission, it acknowledges that it is not a “complete solution” .  For example, it won’t remove the possibility of disputes between co-owners. 

Alongside the recommendations on commonhold, the Law Commission has made radical and sweeping proposals to reform leasehold enfranchisement and right to manage, by overhauling the procedures to make them quicker, simpler and more accessible to leaseholders. In particular, leaseholders may no longer be required to pay the landlord’s legal costs associated with these claims. This comes on the back of a previous Law Commission report (see our insight here) recommending ways in which the amounts payable by leaseholders for extending their leases or buying the freehold could be reduced. 

The proposals will require a significant amount of Government and Parliamentary time before legislation can be introduced and so will have to take their place in the queue behind more pressing matters. There are important political considerations here such as the current housing crisis and urgent need to build more new homes as well as the fact that with an estimated 4.3 million leaseholders in the country, there is significant political capital at play. Nevertheless, the Law Commission has signalled a clear direction of travel for the future of home ownership and we shall be watching developments closely.  

For more information and analysis about the Law Commission’s proposals, please click on our insights on our Essential Residential Hub below:


For more information, please do not hesitate to contact Lauren Fraser, Laura Bushaway or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • A Family Lawyer’s guide to five of the top most Googled Family Law questions in England and Wales relating to children

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Drip Pricing and Enforcement: How the DMCC Act is Changing the Rules

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • The Standard quotes William Marriott on the impact of the newly introduced 'mansion tax' in the UK

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Amenity Space in UK Office Buildings: Why It Matters and What Tenants Need to Consider

    Lynsey Inglis

    Insights

  • UK Hotels Sector 2026: Renovations, AI and Experience‑Led Stays

    James Broadhurst

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows Real Estate team with the appointment of UK and Italian market expert Chiara Del Frate

    Robin Grove MIoL

    News

  • Investment Week quotes Greg Stonefield on whether 2026 will be the year of London IPOs

    Greg Stonefield

    In the Press

  • Compliance Week quotes Abigail Rushton on the UK’s anti-corruption strategy and compliance lessons for companies and advisors

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

  • When Saying “No” to Mediation Is Reasonable: Guidance from Grijns v Grijns

    Bella Preece

    Quick Reads

  • TechRound quotes Charlotte Hill and Vadim Romanoff on their 2026 cryptocurrency and digital assets predictions

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • A farm legal resilience checklist: 10-Minute audit to protect your business in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Property Wire quotes Josh Risso-Gill on the 'deep resourcing challenges' faced by many local planning authorities amidst significant delays

    Josh Risso-Gill

    In the Press

  • Internet Retailing quotes Jamie Cartwright on the HFSS advertising ban

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Harriet Betteridge, Hannah Catt, Gregoire Uldry and Alex Reid on 2026 predictions in the private wealth space

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

  • IFA Magazine, eprivateclient and Today's Family Lawyer quote Sarah Jane Boon on the concept of 'divorce day'

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Caroline Greenwell and Bella Henry on the Santander APP fraud case

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

  • Bloomberg quotes Piers Master on changes to the UK’s family office economy

    Piers Master

    In the Press

  • What does 2026 offer for the delivery of energy projects?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Fake Reviews Under Fire: How the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC Act) Targets Misleading Practices

    Dillon Ravikumar

    Insights

  • Non-EU Courts on the Enforcement of Spain’s Intra-EU Arbitration Awards: Sovereign Immunity and EU Law Objections

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

Back to top