• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Law commission reports signal significant changes to home ownership

min read

The Law Commission has today released three reports spanning almost 2000 pages on enfranchisement, right to manage and commonhold. The Law Commission was tasked by the Government to carry out a review of the residential leasehold system with the specific purpose of creating a better deal for leaseholders as consumers. This has resulted in a dramatic recommendation by the Law Commission that the residential leasehold system should be replaced with commonhold. If the Government accepts this recommendation it would represent the biggest shake-up of home ownership in history. 

Commonhold has had very low take up since its introduction in 2004 due to its lack of appeal to investors and developers and the difficulties with converting existing leasehold properties to commonhold. The Law Commission has proposed significant changes to the commonhold system to address some of its most unattractive features, but more importantly, it has called on the Government to either incentivise the take up of commonhold or even to make it mandatory. 

The Law Commission maintains that commonhold provides greater control for home owners over service charges and major works. They are also unconvinced that professional freeholders provide a significantly higher level of service than that which would be provided by leaseholders themselves. The proposals would allow an existing leasehold building to convert to a commonhold system if just half of the leaseholders agree and without the requirement for consent from the freeholder. This raises an important point that whilst commonhold may provide answers to some of the problems identified by the Law Commission, it acknowledges that it is not a “complete solution” .  For example, it won’t remove the possibility of disputes between co-owners. 

Alongside the recommendations on commonhold, the Law Commission has made radical and sweeping proposals to reform leasehold enfranchisement and right to manage, by overhauling the procedures to make them quicker, simpler and more accessible to leaseholders. In particular, leaseholders may no longer be required to pay the landlord’s legal costs associated with these claims. This comes on the back of a previous Law Commission report (see our insight here) recommending ways in which the amounts payable by leaseholders for extending their leases or buying the freehold could be reduced. 

The proposals will require a significant amount of Government and Parliamentary time before legislation can be introduced and so will have to take their place in the queue behind more pressing matters. There are important political considerations here such as the current housing crisis and urgent need to build more new homes as well as the fact that with an estimated 4.3 million leaseholders in the country, there is significant political capital at play. Nevertheless, the Law Commission has signalled a clear direction of travel for the future of home ownership and we shall be watching developments closely.  

For more information and analysis about the Law Commission’s proposals, please click on our insights on our Essential Residential Hub below:


For more information, please do not hesitate to contact Lauren Fraser, Laura Bushaway or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • Practicalities of Property Management Seminar

    Events

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Court Determined Global Licence Determinations (Interim and Final): Cross Border Complexities

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • Jonathan Burt comments in The Telegraph on HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Miranda Fisher and Hannah Owen write in the Daily Mail's This is Money section on whether you can divorce your parents

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

    min read
  • Keir Gordon and Molly Moseley write in City AM about how high-net-worth individuals can rival private equity in sport

    Keir Gordon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted in two categories for Legal Business Awards 2026

    Lesley O’Leary

    News

    min read
  • The CMA’s new supply chain guidance on greenwashing claims: what it means for brands, manufacturers, retailers and platforms

    Hemani Sandal

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Dangote Cement and the Emerging Shape of London’s Equity Markets

    Greg Stonefield

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Key factors to understand when investing in a regulated business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Arise Capital Partners on its acquisition of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

    Keir Gordon

    News

    min read
  • Emoji on trial: Can a thumbs-up waive a rent increase?

    Harriet Durn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top