• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Extension of stay to possession proceedings during Coronavirus outbreak

min read

Since 27 March 2020, all new and existing possession proceedings against residential tenants have been automatically stayed, under an amendment made to the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 by the introduction of Practice Direction 51Z.

The stay was brought in for an initial period of 90 days from 27 March 2020.  However, the Government announced on 5 June 2020, that the stay on possession proceedings will be extended for a further two months until 23 August 2020.

The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 have been amended to include a new CPR Rule 55.29 (from the expiry of the current stay on 25 June 2020) staying possession proceedings to 23 August 2020. This means that any proceedings sent to the Court for issue will immediately be stayed and cannot continue until after the stay has expired, at the earliest in August 2020.

The Government’s press release on 5 June 2020 suggests that the stay may not be extended for any further period beyond 23 August 2020 as the Housing Secretary, Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP stated that “Eviction hearings will not be heard in Courts until the end of August and no-one will be evicted from their home this summer due to coronavirus”.  However, there is a power to grant further extensions, if the position changes.

The Courts are taking steps to prepare for possession hearings to resume after the stay is lifted. Traditionally, these hearings have taken place within the Courts as a block list with a number of hearings scheduled at the same time. It is likely that hearings will take place remotely either via a web-based platform or telephone but there may be different considerations between Courts at a local level.  When the stay is lifted, there is likely to be a significant backlog within the Court system.  The judiciary has set up a working group to consider the practical issues arising from possession hearings in advance of the lifting of the stay.

Landlords are also currently restricted under the Coronavirus Act 2020 from serving notices to terminate certain residential tenancies until 30 September 2020 (with a power within the legislation for this date to be extended).  This restriction applies to the service of Section 21 Notices and Section 8 Notices to terminate Assured Shorthold Tenancies and requires a landlord to give at least 3 months’ notice in the prescribed form.

We will be tracking the latest developments on our Essential Residential hub.


Please do not hesitate to contact Lauren Fraser, Laura Bushaway or any member of the Real Estate Disputes team if you have any queries.  This insight is not a substitute for legal advice on the specific circumstances of the case.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • Qatar’s New Preliminary Registration Framework: A Transformative Step for the Off-Plan Market

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Pay Up or We'll Tell All: The High Court's Firm Stance on Blackmail in Privacy Cases

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top