• news-banner

    Expert Insights

COVID-19 – The long term impacts on the office occupier market

min read

The past few weeks has seen the most radical change to our collective working patterns in living memory. Businesses that would ordinarily operate out of offices have had to find ways for their entire workforce to work from home. These office occupiers have had their remote working technology tested in a way that was unimaginable just a short time ago; undoubtedly some have fared better than others. With any initial teething problems now hopefully subsiding, a major question remains to be addressed; what long-term impact will this prolonged period of remote working have on the office occupier market? 

The current pandemic is giving businesses an opportunity to assess the viability of remote working against their business models. Some will inevitably conclude that they simply do not need the amount of office space which they have needed up until now. These businesses may, for example, ask some staff to work remotely on a permanent basis or may even adopt a model where staff rotate the days on which they are physically present in the office, potentially cutting the amount of space required by half or more. 

Despite the potential cost saving from reducing office space, this may not suit all businesses and many office occupiers will be reluctant to go down this route. Much has been reported already during this pandemic about the mental strain of working remotely; the office is not just a place of work, but a place to meet and interact with colleagues and clients alike. In addition, there are many practical constraints which arise from remote working, ranging from the unreliable nature of many home WiFi connections to the production of hard copy documents which many workers will necessarily require in their day-to-day work. Any long term isolation of workers through remote working could therefore be counter-productive. 

So what are the other options? 

The past few years has seen a rise in the use of shared office spaces, with providers such as WeWork experiencing exponential growth. WeWork allows its members to benefit from fully fitted-out co-working office spaces, in exchange for an all-inclusive monthly fee. This type of arrangement is more flexible than the traditional office leasing model, where occupiers are often locked in for a fixed term. However, there are several disadvantages to the WeWork model. Even before the current lockdown began, many office occupiers had started taking measures to protect their workforce from the effects of the pandemic and to minimise social interaction; that of course would have been a more difficult task for those occupiers operating out of shared office spaces. There are also more general concerns with co-working, such as the potential lack of privacy and the consequent implications for confidentiality, and also managing noise and other distractions for the workforce. 

Given the potential pitfalls of co-working, it is likely that the majority of office occupiers will continue to be reluctant to move away from the traditional leasing model. That said, many occupiers will be keen to introduce flexibility into their leasing arrangements, so that they are better placed to deal with a recurrence of this or future pandemics and other unexpected economic shocks. It is therefore more important than ever that office occupiers take legal advice at an early stage, ideally before settling Heads of Terms. Our advice would be, for example, not to simply look to secure a break option from the landlord, but rather to seek maximum flexibility in that break whether it be on rolling dates, shorter notice or in minimising any conditions attached; this can mean the difference between successfully exiting a lease and being stuck with a significant liability which is no longer required by the business and simply drains cash flow. 

Away from break options, there are several other ways in which leases of office space can be made more flexible. This includes flexibility on sharing or divesting that space (by assignment or underletting), rent payment holiday provisions and shorter lease terms to name a few. Expert legal advice can help guide office occupiers through each of these options and to ensure that office occupiers are prepared for the challenging times which lie ahead. 

The traditional office occupier model is unlikely to fall away as a consequence of the current pandemic. However, office occupiers are likely to place more emphasis than ever before on structuring their occupational arrangements in a way that allows them quickly and effectively to respond to sudden unexpected shocks. Ensuring that legal advice is taken at the right time will be critical in helping office occupiers navigate the post-pandemic world.

This article was written by Usman Khan. For more information, please contact Usman on +44 (0)20 7427 6517 or at usman.khan@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain social audits: what they are, their limitations, and why they matter for human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Summer 2026 Update: Where are we are on the Government’s roadmap to Commonhold?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024: New consultations on valuation and legal costs of enfranchisement and lease extension claims

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Leasehold Reform; Government responds to consultation on service charge regulation

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitrating Construction Disputes – Comparing the ICC, LCIA, SIAC and SCCA Rules

    Christopher O'Brien

    Insights

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
  • What last week’s Bank of England decision means for private capital stakeholders

    Philip Withey

    Insights

    min read
Back to top