• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Corporate insolvency changes: what do they mean for landlords and tenants?

The government’s temporary changes to the insolvency rules to cater for Covid-19 – in particular the new restrictions on the presentation of winding-up petitions – have been well-publicised. These have now been packaged within an Act (the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act (“CIGA”)) which also brought in significant, permanent changes to UK insolvency law.

Many tenants will want to explore whether these changes may assist them through the present difficult period. Landlords should therefore be aware of the new options available to tenant companies for dealing with financial difficulties – including the new moratorium which is available to them.

Standalone Moratorium

How much breathing space can a company get?

One of the permanent changes made by the CIGA is the introduction of a “Gateway Moratorium” – which offers greater control to the company’s directors than processes such as CVAs or administrations. 

The purpose of the moratorium is to allow companies some breathing space in which to consider and implement rescue options while enforcement or other legal action is restricted. The effect of the moratorium is that there will be a payment holiday whilst it is in place for any debts incurred pre-moratorium except for the following six categories of debt:

  • The monitor’s remuneration and expenses
  • Goods and services supplied during the moratorium
  • Rent for the period of the moratorium
  • Wages and salary
  • Redundancy payments
  • Financial services contracts, including bank loans.

If a company fails to pay rent for the period during which the moratorium is in place, the monitor (see below) can terminate the moratorium. Indications are that rent will be payable during a moratorium on a daily basis as it is for companies in administration. Although it is unclear whether the obligation to pay rent extends to sums other than basic rent (but which are defined as rent in the Lease), it seems likely that service charges would be payable given a company’s obligation to pay for services supplied during the moratorium. 

How does the moratorium affect a landlord’s remedies?

Once a moratorium is in place, no insolvency proceedings can be instituted against the company. Enforcement or other legal proceedings can only be brought with the court’s permission, which may be granted with conditions. As with certain insolvency procedures, the moratorium is therefore likely to restrict remedies such as forfeiture, CRAR etc. whilst it is in place.

How long does the moratorium last?

The moratorium lasts for an initial period of 20 business days from the date when the documents are filed/the order is made (as appropriate). Directors can apply to extend this period in a number of ways:

  1. Without creditor consent (note that only one extension of a further 20 business days can be achieved without creditor consent)
  2. With creditor consent (by a qualifying decision procedure)
  3. By court order
  4. If CVA proposals are still pending (and in this instance, the extension is automatic)

Options 1 to 3 mentioned above can only be achieved if all of the moratorium debts have been paid in full. This includes any pre-moratorium debts which were not subject to the “payment holiday” (see above).

Once the moratorium ends, the payment holiday will end and the company will be obliged to pay its debts on an ongoing basis. If the moratorium has been unsuccessful and the company enters into some form of insolvency process, then the company’s debts will be dealt with as part of that process.

Is the moratorium an insolvency process and how does a landlord find out about it?

Importantly, applying for the moratorium does not mean that the company has entered into any form of insolvency proceedings. However, there is an obligation to notify Companies House and all creditors of the moratorium so that it is a matter of public record, even if it is not a ‘formal’ insolvency procedure. The inclusion of financial services contracts in the list of liabilities that will not attract a payment holiday means that companies will likely have to garner their lenders’ support for a moratorium before seeking one.

Who is eligible for the moratorium and how does it work?

The eligibility criteria for a company wishing to obtain a moratorium are fairly wide and complex. There are a number of key exclusions but an assessment of eligibility will require a detailed review of the legislation in each case. 

The process of obtaining a moratorium involves an application to court. The directors must make a statement that the company is, or is likely to become, unable to pay its debts. The CIGA introduces the role of a “monitor”, who must be a licensed insolvency practitioner, and who must make a statement that it is likely that a moratorium for the company would result in the rescue of the company as a going concern. 

The role of the monitor is as an independent party to ensure that the company complies with the terms of the moratorium, but he or she is not in charge of the company’s affairs or management. The directors will remain in charge of running the business on a day-to-day basis. However, the monitor will need to approve sales of assets outside the normal course of business and any grant of new security over the company’s assets. The amount of debt which a company can pay without its monitor’s consent is £5,000 or 1% of the total debts owed to unsecured creditors and the monitor should only consent to a payment if it will support the rescue of the company as a going concern.

The moratorium will bind both secured and unsecured creditors, but it is open to a creditor to challenge the actions of the monitor and the directors, if he or she thinks that their actions have unfairly harmed their interest(s).

New restructuring plan

The CIGA introduces new provisions into the existing Companies Act 2006 for a regime for companies in financial difficulty to propose a restructuring arrangement with its members and/or creditors.

The new procedure is not dissimilar to a company voluntary arrangement but the key difference is that, with the new procedure, companies will have the advantage of being able to “cram down” (i.e. overrule) a dissenting class of voting creditors provided that the court gives permission for this. If the court approves the proposals, then they are binding on all creditors (both secured and unsecured) except if there was a moratorium in the last 12 weeks before the application to court was made. In those circumstances, the arrangement will not be binding on creditors whose debts arose during the moratorium and creditors who were not subject to the payment holiday without those creditors’ consent.

Other changes

The CIGA makes other changes to insolvency laws, both with temporary and permanent effects. 

The restrictions detailed above have been removed.  Please refer to our latest guidance in our March 2022 Quarter Day page which can be found here.

Please contact Emma Humphreys and Jessica Williams or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact in order for further information. 

This briefing note is not a substitute for legal advice on the specific circumstances of your case.

Our thinking

  • Advocacy: Lessons from The Mandela Brief for International Arbitration Today

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

  • LIIARC Tax Investigations Uncovered: Legal Tactics, Courtroom Trends & Strategic Remedies

    Caroline Greenwell

    Events

  • Sarah Jane Boon and Jemimah Fleet write for Today’s Family Lawyer on the repeal of the presumption of parental involvement

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Updates from the Building Safety Regulator - Unblocking the Gateways for Higher Risk Buildings

    Tegan Johnson

    Quick Reads

  • Insights from the latest ABA Technology in M&A Subcommittee meeting – where are recent innovations taking us?

    Daniel Rosenberg

    Quick Reads

  • World Intellectual Property Review quotes Dewdney William Drew on the Getty Images vs Stability AI decision

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • The 1975 Act Turns Fifty: Why Reform was Needed and What Changed

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • ECCTA for Charities: Maintaining Registers

    Giverny McAndry

    Insights

  • ECCTA 2023 - Failure to prevent fraud offence- what charities need to know and do

    Penelope Byatt

    Insights

  • What do agricultural landlords and workers need to know about the Renters’ Rights Act?

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • An introduction to Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 for charities: key changes from 18 November 2025

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Succession Stumbling Blocks: Lessons from Thomas v Countryside Solutions Ltd

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Morning Star UK quotes Julia Cox on the impact of potential inheritance tax rises in the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • What legal developments can the Living Sector expect as we approach the end of 2025 and look ahead to 2026?

    Mark White

    Insights

  • CDR Magazine quotes Jue Jun Lu on China’s newly revised arbitration law

    Jue Jun Lu

    In the Press

  • Andrew Ross and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on a Supreme Court judgment relating to nuisance

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

  • Good Divorce Week 2025: Believe it or not, there is a better way

    Emily Borrowdale

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters its Corporate team with the appointment of Ed Morgan

    David Collins

    News

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Sifting the Rumours on Tax Rises and Reforms

    Charlotte Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Adjudication under the Construction Act – a case on the residential occupier exception and contesting the validity of a payless notice

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

Back to top