• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Relief for Private Dental Practices? - Update following the verdict of the FCA’s business interruption insurance test case

We recently wrote about the implication of the Government’s lockdown orders forcing dental practices to shut their doors, with all routine care being suspended nationwide. Our previous article highlighted that new evidence suggested that more than three-quarters of dentist practices will receive no support from the Government’s COVID-19 support schemes. With many dental practices facing an insurer refusing to pay out for business interruptions relating to the global pandemic coupled with being unable to rely on the Government, many were left wondering where to turn next. 

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) had previously confirmed that the majority of business interruption policies don't make provisions for disruptions caused by a pandemic, meaning insurers won't pay out to most businesses affected by COVID-19. However, at the time of making the statement, the Financial Conduct Authority were in the process of seeking a Court declaration to clarify which claims should be honoured.

Positive news recently surfaced on 15th September 2020, as the High Court ruled that the majority of businesses who held business interruption insurance and were forced to close due to the COVID-19 pandemic are entitled to be compensated by their insurers and that, subject to the limits of the policy, this compensation should return them to the position they would have been in had the pandemic never happened.

Whilst this is certainly welcome news for all dental practices, the ruling reconfirmed that pay-outs remain subject to the limits of the policy. Like all insurance products, the small print of business interruption policies carries a list of exclusions, with infectious diseases typically being one of them. The FCA’s test case has now provided an element of clarity and certainty for many policy holders, however, whether an insurer is truly capable of denying or limiting a claim will still depend on the specific wording of the business interruption insurance policy.

During the midst of the Government’s lockdown orders, we highlighted the alarming statistic that 70% of practices say that they can only maintain financial viability for a maximum of three months. We have seen a gradual easing of lockdown measures and practices have been able to treat patients again (albeit with many restrictions affecting portability still in place). With the obvious need for urgency, practices will find some comfort in that fact that insurers have been encouraged by the FCA to, irrespective of any appeals process, consider the steps they must now take to progress claims.

To assist with the cash flow difficulties which have arisen, at Charles Russell Speechlys we are now demanding that our clients’ insurance providers make an immediate interim payment whilst full losses are calculated. Whether you’re looking to bring a claim against your insurer or simply seeking clarity as to your position under your insurance policy, our specialist lawyers are able to assist by combining sector-specific knowledge with insurance law and regulatory expertise.

For further information on how we can support you and your business, please contact Helen Wong, Tertius Alberts or your regular contact at Charles Russell Speechlys.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2023

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • Doing business in the UAE & Israel

    William Reichert

    Events

  • Calculating Social Value in BTR

    Francis Ho

    Events

  • Dangers of trusts

    Mark Summers

    Events

  • The Evening Standard quotes Rose Carey on the increase in visa fees

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard

    News

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer

    News

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Emma Humphreys on UK rental costs

    Emma Humphreys

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Hamish Perry and Mike Barrington write for The Evening Standard on whether a merger between the CBI and Make UK can work

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • Silicon quotes Gareth Mills on the UK consumer lawsuit against Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes Louise Ward on the additional support required by aspiring UK life sciences operators

    Louise Ward

    In the Press

  • Sarah Higgins and David Wells-Cole write for Wealth Briefing on the pitfalls of using unregulated legal services

    Sarah Higgins

    In the Press

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • New Governance Guidelines for family-owned businesses in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ UK offices receive environmental certification

    Kerry Stares

    News

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Key figures gather to discuss the future of Gloucestershire

    Jonathan Morley

    Quick Reads

  • UK CMA's blocks Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a potentially significant decision for SMEs in the video gaming sector

    Rebecca Burford

    Quick Reads

  • Key takeaways from the UK Government's "Green Day"

    Martha Glaser

    Quick Reads

  • From Holby City to 5 Fleet Place - David Ames shares his experience of "Behind the Lens" with CRS

    Quick Reads

  • The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 in Action

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • Number crunching times

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • This week in the news: inheritance tax interest costs rising due to Probate delays

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • WhatsAppGate - Should businesses be reviewing their social media policies?

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

  • Updates to EMI Options in the Spring Budget 2023

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai announces its plan to streamline the enforcement of civil judgments and arbitral awards

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

Back to top