• news-banner

    Expert Insights

A guide to Company Share Option Plans

What is a Company Share Option Plan (“CSOP”)?

A CSOP is a form of discretionary share option scheme which can have favourable tax treatment.  

The eligibility rules for CSOP schemes recently changed with effect from 6 April 2023, meaning CSOP is now an alternative open to some companies who previously did not qualify.  The individual financial limit has also been doubled from £30,000 to £60,000. This limit is significantly less than for EMI options (£250,000); however, unlike for EMI options there is no overall company limit or three-year limit.  

The eligibility requirements are less strict for CSOPs than for EMI. However, the tax treatment is often less beneficial such that most companies who qualify for EMI would choose to opt for an EMI scheme over a CSOP scheme. However, for companies that no longer qualify for EMI, e.g. because they are too large, CSOP can be an attractive second choice.

What kind of shares can Company Share Option Plan options be granted over?

CSOP options can be awarded over the shares of UK private, public or listed companies, and also over the shares of foreign parent companies, provided that the relevant statutory requirements are met.  

The shares must be:

  • ordinary share capital;
  • fully paid up and non-redeemable; and
  • one of the following: (a) of a class listed on a recognised stock exchange, (b) in a company which is not under the control of another company, or (c) in a company which is subject to an employee-ownership trust.

Previously, an additional requirement applied in respect of CSOP companies with more than one class of ordinary shares which limited their ability to utilise CSOP options. However, this “worth having requirement” was removed for share options granted under a CSOP from 6 April 2023.  

Who can be granted Company Share Option Plan options?

An individual can be granted CSOP options if:

  • they are a full-time director or an employee of the company or in the case of a group scheme, a constituent company (i.e. a company which the parent controls and which the scheme is expressed to extend to); and
  • the individual (and/or their associates) does not have a “material interest” in a close company which is either the CSOP company, its parent or in any member of a consortium which owns such a parent company.

Unlike EMI, the meaning of “full-time director” is not defined in the legislation. HMRC considers a full-time director to be a director who works at least 25 hours p/w which may be aggregated across several participating companies.

A “material interest” is broadly an interest in more than 30% of the share capital of the company or assets of the company on a winding up.

What are the limits?

The exercise price of the options must be stated at the time of grant and cannot be manifestly less than the unrestricted market value (UMV) of the shares of the same class at the time when the option is granted.  As a tax-advantaged scheme, the UMV can be agreed upfront with HMRC.

With effect from 6 April 2023, each individual can only hold unexercised qualifying CSOP options over shares worth £60,000. This limit is significantly less than for EMI options (£250,000); however, unlike for EMI options there is no overall company limit or three-year limit.

Tax treatment on exercise

The income tax treatment on the exercise of CSOP options depends on when the CSOP options are exercised, and the circumstances in which they are exercised.

There is no income tax or National Insurance contributions (NICs) on the exercise of CSOP options:

  • on or before the tenth anniversary of the date of grant of the option; and 
  • on or after the third anniversary of the date of grant.

Beneficial tax treatment is also available in limited situations where CSOP options are exercised within three years, including:

  • When someone has left work for reasons associated with injury, disability, redundancy or retirement (provided the CSOP options are exercised within 6 months); and
  • Certain types of takeover, noting that this generally does not include most takeovers of private companies because of the typical way in which such takeovers are structured.

For any CSOP options exercised outside of the statutory “safe harbours”, income tax (and National Insurance contributions and potentially the Apprenticeship Levy), will be payable on the amount, if any, by which the actual market value of a share at the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price paid.

Advantages / disadvantages of establishing a Company Share Option Plan

The main advantages of CSOPs are as follows:

  • There is no income tax or NICs payable on the exercise of CSOP options if the CSOP options are exercised within the statutory limits. 
  • As a CSOP is an HMRC tax advantaged scheme, HMRC will agree the market value of shares subject to proposed CSOP options before the options are granted, therefore giving more certainty in relation to the future tax treatment of the options.  
  • Assuming the relevant criteria are met, the company will receive corporation tax relief on the acquisition of shares following the exercise of CSOP options, even where the employee is not subject to income tax on the option gain because of the tax relief available.
  • The employer can choose to pass on employer’s NICs to the option holder by an agreement or election (as is the case under EMI).
  • CSOPs are discretionary schemes and therefore do not have to be offered to all employees.

Some potential disadvantages of CSOPs are:

  • For CSOP options to benefit from tax advantages in most circumstances there are minimum holding periods.  The exercise of CSOP options outside of the statutory provisions or time limits gives rise to income tax (and potentially NICs) liabilities.  
  • The effect of the conditions means that CSOP options are unlikely to be effective when a private company anticipates an exit within three years.
  • An individual can only hold CSOP options over shares (valued at the date of grant) worth a total of £60,000 which is much lower than the financial limit under EMI.
  • Employees with a “material interest” in the company do not qualify to be granted CSOP options.
  • A CSOP is subject to self-certification, registration and filing requirements in order to benefit from tax favoured treatment. This can sometime be time-consuming and requires ongoing compliance.

Our expertise

We work with a wide range of clients – from helping fast growing companies and private equity-backed business to put in place incentives arrangement through to undertaking both HMRC approved and unapproved share option plan work for larger companies in the UK.

Please contact Robert Birchall or your usual Charles Russell Speechly contact if you would like to get in touch.

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Fiona Edmond writes for The Law Society Gazette on taking maternity leave as a Deputy Senior Partner

    Fiona Edmond

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Annie Green write for Employee Benefits on the impact of dropping the real living wage pledge

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Planning and Life Sciences: the challenges and opportunities in the Golden Triangle

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • London’s Knowledge Clusters: From Emerging to Maturing – Start Ups on the Global Stage?

    Lynsey Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Précisions sur le prix d’acquisition des titres souscrits en exercice de BSPCE : nouvelles perspectives pour les starts-ups en France?

    Raphaël Bagdassarian

    Quick Reads

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • It’s not just a High Court decision, it’s a successful M&S High Court Decision

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: when can an enforcement notice against an unlawful use also require the removal of related structures?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Danish tax authority wins "cum-ex" tax fraud case at the Supreme Court

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Good news for users of the Madrid System

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Michael Gove's announcement on transitional period for two staircase requirement for new residential buildings

    Melanie Hardingham

    Quick Reads

  • Navratri at Charles Russell Speechlys

    Arjun Thakrar

    Quick Reads

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

Back to top