• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Deemed delivery of notice

min read

Great care needs to be taken in calculating the date on which deemed service has occurred when serving notice to the shareholders for a General Meeting (GM) or an Annual General Meeting (AGM). In serving notices, a UK company needs to ensure that it complies with both the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) and any provisions in the company’s articles of association (the Articles). 

In this article, we consider the provisions under the Act only.

What does clear days’ notice mean?

Under section 360 of the Act, any references to days within the sections which set the minimum notice periods for general meetings are to “clear” days.  What this means is that when calculating the specified notice period, the day of the GM (or AGM) and the day that the notice is given are excluded. Furthermore, when determining the date on which notice is given, we need to bear in mind the statutory deemed delivery provision (see below). For private companies (this does not include traded companies), unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice period for a GM (including an AGM), other than an adjourned meeting, is 14 clear days (section 307(1) and (3) of the Act).

For public companies, unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice periods are:

  • for an AGM, other than an adjourned meeting, 21 clear days (section 307(2) of the Act); and
  • for a GM, other than an AGM or an adjourned meeting, 14 clear days (section 307(2)(b) of the Act).

Deemed Delivery

Under section 1147 of the Act, the rules on the deemed delivery of documents and information sent by a company to its shareholders are as follows:

  • by post: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, prepaid and posted to an address in the United Kingdom, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was posted (s1147(2) of the Act);
  • by electronic means: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was sent (s1147(3) of the Act); and
  • website: deemed delivery is when the material was first made available on the website or, if later, actual or deemed receipt of notice (sent by post or electronic means) of the fact that the material is on the website (s1147(4) of the Act).
    Section 1147(5) of the Act clarifies that we should not take in account any part of a day that is not a working day. Accordingly, if, for example, a notice was posted on a Friday, deemed delivery would be the following Tuesday.

Of course, all of the above is on the basis that the Articles do not have any contrary provisions (section 1147 (6) of the Act).

An example

Private company or GM of a public company

 

  By post or Electronic means 

Notice of GM posted

Friday 1 June 2018

Notice deemed delivered

Tuesday 5 June 2018

14 days’ notice

Up until Tuesday 19 June 2018

Earliest date of meeting

Wednesday 20 June 2018

 

AGM of a Public company

  By post or Electronic means 
Notice of AGM posted Friday 1 June 2018
Notice deemed delivered Tuesday 5 June 2018
21 days’ notice Up until Tuesday 26 June 2018
Earliest date of meeting Wednesday 27 June 2018


What happens if notice is not validly given?

If a company does not send a notice to every person entitled to receive notice, the proceedings at the meeting may be invalid.

Notwithstanding the above, under section 313(1) of the Act, the accidental failure to give notice of either a general meeting or a resolution to be moved at a general meeting to one or more persons does not automatically render the meeting or the resolution invalid.

Section 313(1) of the Act, may, however, be overridden by the Articles except in relation to:

  • notice of meeting required by shareholders under section 304 of the Act (i.e. when the directors are under a duty to call a meeting, which has been requested by the shareholders);
  • notice of meeting called by shareholders under section 305 of the Act (i.e. when the shareholders can call a meeting because the directors have failed to do so under section 304); and
  • notice of resolutions at AGMs proposed by shareholders under section 339 of the Act

Conclusion

Although these rules seem straight-forward, on many occasions companies have fallen foul of them, which, therefore, rendered the proceedings during a GM or AGM invalid.

Our thinking

  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 4-6

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Hearthstone Investments on its acquisition by Sentinel Real Estate

    Edward Robinson

    News

    min read
  • The Silent Majority: Why Britain's Family Businesses Are the Overlooked Engine of AIM and the Main Market

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Disclosing Settlement Agreements in Due Diligence: Navigating Confidentiality and Risk

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

    min read
  • UK Defence Sector and the Role of Government, Private Capital, and the Primes

    Gustina Singgih

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Annapaola Negri-Clementi, Giorgia Ligasacchi and Valeria Tommasi write in We Wealth about the cost of delayed intervention in accurately dating historic artwork

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    In the Press

    min read
  • Paul Arathoon comments in The Banker, Finextra and others about Revolut’s mooted dual listing in the UK and US

    Paul Arathoon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys has advised TXT e-Solutions S.p.A. on its acquisition of FMA Investment Holding S.r.l.

    News

    min read
  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to just and equitable winding up

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises on the sale of RTL Materials (Rolatube) to Addtech AB

    Paul Arathoon

    News

    min read
  • Qatar launches "Companies House" to streamline business registration across economic zones

    Ahmad Anani

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake and Mike Barrington write in Finextra about regulatory themes every FCA-authorised fintech leader should be watching

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    In the Press

    min read
  • Private equity (PE): How Founders and Management Teams can protect themselves - it’s a marriage of convenience so make sure your pre-nup is watertight…

    Nadim Meer

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens Middle East Corporate practice with appointment of Philip O’Riordan

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Technology, AI and US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
Back to top