• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Deemed delivery of notice

Great care needs to be taken in calculating the date on which deemed service has occurred when serving notice to the shareholders for a General Meeting (GM) or an Annual General Meeting (AGM). In serving notices, a UK company needs to ensure that it complies with both the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) and any provisions in the company’s articles of association (the Articles). 

In this article, we consider the provisions under the Act only.

What does clear days’ notice mean?

Under section 360 of the Act, any references to days within the sections which set the minimum notice periods for general meetings are to “clear” days.  What this means is that when calculating the specified notice period, the day of the GM (or AGM) and the day that the notice is given are excluded. Furthermore, when determining the date on which notice is given, we need to bear in mind the statutory deemed delivery provision (see below). For private companies (this does not include traded companies), unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice period for a GM (including an AGM), other than an adjourned meeting, is 14 clear days (section 307(1) and (3) of the Act).

For public companies, unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice periods are:

  • for an AGM, other than an adjourned meeting, 21 clear days (section 307(2) of the Act); and
  • for a GM, other than an AGM or an adjourned meeting, 14 clear days (section 307(2)(b) of the Act).

Deemed Delivery

Under section 1147 of the Act, the rules on the deemed delivery of documents and information sent by a company to its shareholders are as follows:

  • by post: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, prepaid and posted to an address in the United Kingdom, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was posted (s1147(2) of the Act);
  • by electronic means: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was sent (s1147(3) of the Act); and
  • website: deemed delivery is when the material was first made available on the website or, if later, actual or deemed receipt of notice (sent by post or electronic means) of the fact that the material is on the website (s1147(4) of the Act).
    Section 1147(5) of the Act clarifies that we should not take in account any part of a day that is not a working day. Accordingly, if, for example, a notice was posted on a Friday, deemed delivery would be the following Tuesday.

Of course, all of the above is on the basis that the Articles do not have any contrary provisions (section 1147 (6) of the Act).

An example

Private company or GM of a public company

 

  By post or Electronic means 

Notice of GM posted

Friday 1 June 2018

Notice deemed delivered

Tuesday 5 June 2018

14 days’ notice

Up until Tuesday 19 June 2018

Earliest date of meeting

Wednesday 20 June 2018

 

AGM of a Public company

  By post or Electronic means 
Notice of AGM posted Friday 1 June 2018
Notice deemed delivered Tuesday 5 June 2018
21 days’ notice Up until Tuesday 26 June 2018
Earliest date of meeting Wednesday 27 June 2018


What happens if notice is not validly given?

If a company does not send a notice to every person entitled to receive notice, the proceedings at the meeting may be invalid.

Notwithstanding the above, under section 313(1) of the Act, the accidental failure to give notice of either a general meeting or a resolution to be moved at a general meeting to one or more persons does not automatically render the meeting or the resolution invalid.

Section 313(1) of the Act, may, however, be overridden by the Articles except in relation to:

  • notice of meeting required by shareholders under section 304 of the Act (i.e. when the directors are under a duty to call a meeting, which has been requested by the shareholders);
  • notice of meeting called by shareholders under section 305 of the Act (i.e. when the shareholders can call a meeting because the directors have failed to do so under section 304); and
  • notice of resolutions at AGMs proposed by shareholders under section 339 of the Act

Conclusion

Although these rules seem straight-forward, on many occasions companies have fallen foul of them, which, therefore, rendered the proceedings during a GM or AGM invalid.

Our thinking

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys bolsters corporate and commercial offering with the appointment of Shirley Fu in Hong Kong

    Simon Green

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Give Back Beauty Group in the acquisition of INCC Parfums

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Countryside Partnerships on its joint venture with Abri to develop 1,500 homes in West Sussex

    Sarah Wigington

    News

  • Précisions sur le prix d’acquisition des titres souscrits en exercice de BSPCE : nouvelles perspectives pour les starts-ups en France?

    Raphaël Bagdassarian

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys boosts international private wealth offering with the arrival of Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    News

  • Mark Howard writes for the Evening Standard on the blocked Telegraph takeover, the NSI Act and the Enterprise Act 2002

    Mark Howard

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • The Lawyer covers the recent growth and strategy of our corporate practice

    David Collins

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises on three secondary fundraises across three different markets

    Paul Arathoon

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Vitro on a major international restructuring project

    David Cordova Flores

    News

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charlie Ring and Ross Youngs write for FT Adviser on where wealth managers should look to for their own financial advice

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

  • Take-aways for UK firms from ESMA’s consultation on reverse solicitation

    Cheryl Tham

    Insights

  • Post-sale planning: The Maximisation and Protection of Private Wealth following a Business Sale or Exit Event

    Tabitha Collett

    Insights

  • Edward Robinson and Charlie Searle write for FT Adviser on key considerations when an individual inherits company shares

    Edward Robinson

    In the Press

  • Sifted quotes Victoria Younghusband on a boardroom disagreement involving Klarna and Sequoia Capital

    Victoria Younghusband

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Entrepreneurial Food Group on the sale of two food production businesses to The Compleat Food Group

    Hamish Perry

    News

  • The Global Legal Post quotes Mike Barrington on Tesco’s decision to sell its banking practice

    Mike Barrington

    In the Press

  • UK tax considerations for US persons relocating to the UK

    Matthew Radcliffe

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the management sellers of Membr on its sale to Xplor Technologies

    Andrew Clarke

    News

  • Les entreprises en difficulté ou en croissance peuvent-elle se passer des equity lines? Can distressed or growth companies do without hybrid bonds?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Danish tax authority wins "cum-ex" tax fraud case at the Supreme Court

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • Venture capital funds agree 'investment compact' to increase investment in UK high-growth companies

    Mike Barrington

    Quick Reads

  • Return to the full office week?

    Quick Reads

  • Is the opening up of Nexity's services division capital a consequence of the difficulties facing the French property sector?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • New Governance Guidelines for family-owned businesses in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Key figures gather to discuss the future of Gloucestershire

    Jonathan Morley

    Quick Reads

  • UK CMA's blocks Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a potentially significant decision for SMEs in the video gaming sector

    Quick Reads

  • Number crunching times

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • Updates to EMI Options in the Spring Budget 2023

    Quick Reads

  • VAT on fund management services

    Robert Birchall

    Quick Reads

  • Sign of the times - the British record football transfer which very nearly didn't happen

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Statement 2022: Very few surprises

    Robert Birchall

    Quick Reads

  • The Serious Fraud Office and the Crown Prosecution Service call for failure to prevent offences to be extended

    Quick Reads

  • Will construction see red or green today?

    David Savage

    Quick Reads

Back to top