• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Deemed delivery of notice

Great care needs to be taken in calculating the date on which deemed service has occurred when serving notice to the shareholders for a General Meeting (GM) or an Annual General Meeting (AGM). In serving notices, a UK company needs to ensure that it complies with both the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) and any provisions in the company’s articles of association (the Articles). 

In this article, we consider the provisions under the Act only.

What does clear days’ notice mean?

Under section 360 of the Act, any references to days within the sections which set the minimum notice periods for general meetings are to “clear” days.  What this means is that when calculating the specified notice period, the day of the GM (or AGM) and the day that the notice is given are excluded. Furthermore, when determining the date on which notice is given, we need to bear in mind the statutory deemed delivery provision (see below). For private companies (this does not include traded companies), unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice period for a GM (including an AGM), other than an adjourned meeting, is 14 clear days (section 307(1) and (3) of the Act).

For public companies, unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice periods are:

  • for an AGM, other than an adjourned meeting, 21 clear days (section 307(2) of the Act); and
  • for a GM, other than an AGM or an adjourned meeting, 14 clear days (section 307(2)(b) of the Act).

Deemed Delivery

Under section 1147 of the Act, the rules on the deemed delivery of documents and information sent by a company to its shareholders are as follows:

  • by post: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, prepaid and posted to an address in the United Kingdom, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was posted (s1147(2) of the Act);
  • by electronic means: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was sent (s1147(3) of the Act); and
  • website: deemed delivery is when the material was first made available on the website or, if later, actual or deemed receipt of notice (sent by post or electronic means) of the fact that the material is on the website (s1147(4) of the Act).
    Section 1147(5) of the Act clarifies that we should not take in account any part of a day that is not a working day. Accordingly, if, for example, a notice was posted on a Friday, deemed delivery would be the following Tuesday.

Of course, all of the above is on the basis that the Articles do not have any contrary provisions (section 1147 (6) of the Act).

An example

Private company or GM of a public company

 

  By post or Electronic means 

Notice of GM posted

Friday 1 June 2018

Notice deemed delivered

Tuesday 5 June 2018

14 days’ notice

Up until Tuesday 19 June 2018

Earliest date of meeting

Wednesday 20 June 2018

 

AGM of a Public company

  By post or Electronic means 
Notice of AGM posted Friday 1 June 2018
Notice deemed delivered Tuesday 5 June 2018
21 days’ notice Up until Tuesday 26 June 2018
Earliest date of meeting Wednesday 27 June 2018


What happens if notice is not validly given?

If a company does not send a notice to every person entitled to receive notice, the proceedings at the meeting may be invalid.

Notwithstanding the above, under section 313(1) of the Act, the accidental failure to give notice of either a general meeting or a resolution to be moved at a general meeting to one or more persons does not automatically render the meeting or the resolution invalid.

Section 313(1) of the Act, may, however, be overridden by the Articles except in relation to:

  • notice of meeting required by shareholders under section 304 of the Act (i.e. when the directors are under a duty to call a meeting, which has been requested by the shareholders);
  • notice of meeting called by shareholders under section 305 of the Act (i.e. when the shareholders can call a meeting because the directors have failed to do so under section 304); and
  • notice of resolutions at AGMs proposed by shareholders under section 339 of the Act

Conclusion

Although these rules seem straight-forward, on many occasions companies have fallen foul of them, which, therefore, rendered the proceedings during a GM or AGM invalid.

Our thinking

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the University of Strathclyde on the incorporation and establishment of its Bahrain Campus

    Gareth Mills

    News

  • Semiconductor Industry: Commercial & IP Considerations

    Rebecca Steer

    Insights

  • The Banker quotes Victoria Younghusband on the appointment of Bettina Orlopp as Commerzbank's new CEO

    Victoria Younghusband

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Mainsail Partners in its $63 million growth equity investment in MirrorWeb

    Daniel Rosenberg

    News

  • Mark Howard writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on the pros and cons of becoming a non-executive director

    Mark Howard

    In the Press

  • FCA Consultations on prospectus regime

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens Corporate offering with the appointment of Ahmad Anani in Doha, Qatar

    Ahmad Anani

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises EMMA Systems on strategic reorganisation and investment

    Alex Reid

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Nortal on its acquisition of 3DOT Solutions

    Hamish Perry

    News

  • New UK listing rules: streamlined and simplified

    Victoria Younghusband

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Hudl UK, Limited on its acquisition of StatsBomb Services Limited

    Keir Gordon

    News

  • City AM quotes Keir Gordon on more law firms becoming increasingly interested in sport

    Keir Gordon

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its investment into Aveni as part of an £11m investment round

    David Coates

    News

  • Law360 quotes Ashwin Pillay on KKR buying a majority stake in public relations firm FGS Global

    Ashwin Pillay

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises QuestGates in securing an investment from Equistone Partners Europe

    Mark Howard

    News

  • Mind your business: Safeguarding your business against loss of mental capacity

    Julia Cox

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises founders of Observe Technologies on its acquisition by AKVA Group

    Mark Howard

    News

  • All change for UK immigration?

    Owen Chan

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys is acting as UK counsel for Hibbett, Inc. on its proposed $1.1 billion acquisition by JD Sports Fashion Plc

    Andrew Collins

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises COSU FC Limited on its acquisition of Southend United Football Club Limited

    Keir Gordon

    News

Back to top