• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Deemed delivery of notice

Great care needs to be taken in calculating the date on which deemed service has occurred when serving notice to the shareholders for a General Meeting (GM) or an Annual General Meeting (AGM). In serving notices, a UK company needs to ensure that it complies with both the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) and any provisions in the company’s articles of association (the Articles). 

In this article, we consider the provisions under the Act only.

What does clear days’ notice mean?

Under section 360 of the Act, any references to days within the sections which set the minimum notice periods for general meetings are to “clear” days.  What this means is that when calculating the specified notice period, the day of the GM (or AGM) and the day that the notice is given are excluded. Furthermore, when determining the date on which notice is given, we need to bear in mind the statutory deemed delivery provision (see below). For private companies (this does not include traded companies), unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice period for a GM (including an AGM), other than an adjourned meeting, is 14 clear days (section 307(1) and (3) of the Act).

For public companies, unless the Articles require a longer period, the minimum notice periods are:

  • for an AGM, other than an adjourned meeting, 21 clear days (section 307(2) of the Act); and
  • for a GM, other than an AGM or an adjourned meeting, 14 clear days (section 307(2)(b) of the Act).

Deemed Delivery

Under section 1147 of the Act, the rules on the deemed delivery of documents and information sent by a company to its shareholders are as follows:

  • by post: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, prepaid and posted to an address in the United Kingdom, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was posted (s1147(2) of the Act);
  • by electronic means: on the basis that it has been properly addressed, deemed delivery is 48 hours after it was sent (s1147(3) of the Act); and
  • website: deemed delivery is when the material was first made available on the website or, if later, actual or deemed receipt of notice (sent by post or electronic means) of the fact that the material is on the website (s1147(4) of the Act).
    Section 1147(5) of the Act clarifies that we should not take in account any part of a day that is not a working day. Accordingly, if, for example, a notice was posted on a Friday, deemed delivery would be the following Tuesday.

Of course, all of the above is on the basis that the Articles do not have any contrary provisions (section 1147 (6) of the Act).

An example

Private company or GM of a public company

 

  By post or Electronic means 

Notice of GM posted

Friday 1 June 2018

Notice deemed delivered

Tuesday 5 June 2018

14 days’ notice

Up until Tuesday 19 June 2018

Earliest date of meeting

Wednesday 20 June 2018

 

AGM of a Public company

  By post or Electronic means 
Notice of AGM posted Friday 1 June 2018
Notice deemed delivered Tuesday 5 June 2018
21 days’ notice Up until Tuesday 26 June 2018
Earliest date of meeting Wednesday 27 June 2018


What happens if notice is not validly given?

If a company does not send a notice to every person entitled to receive notice, the proceedings at the meeting may be invalid.

Notwithstanding the above, under section 313(1) of the Act, the accidental failure to give notice of either a general meeting or a resolution to be moved at a general meeting to one or more persons does not automatically render the meeting or the resolution invalid.

Section 313(1) of the Act, may, however, be overridden by the Articles except in relation to:

  • notice of meeting required by shareholders under section 304 of the Act (i.e. when the directors are under a duty to call a meeting, which has been requested by the shareholders);
  • notice of meeting called by shareholders under section 305 of the Act (i.e. when the shareholders can call a meeting because the directors have failed to do so under section 304); and
  • notice of resolutions at AGMs proposed by shareholders under section 339 of the Act

Conclusion

Although these rules seem straight-forward, on many occasions companies have fallen foul of them, which, therefore, rendered the proceedings during a GM or AGM invalid.

Our thinking

  • Triple Play "Bid Fever": UK Tech's ability to scale and go global

    Mark Howard

    Quick Reads

  • Key aspects of the FCA’s PISCES Sourcebook

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Mike Barrington and Mary Perham write for Tax Adviser on what the proposed changes to business property relief mean for investors and entrepreneurs, and for their businesses

    Mike Barrington

    In the Press

  • FCA publishes final PISCES Sourcebook

    Jodie Dennis

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating International M&A Disputes: Insights and Strategies for 2025

    Stephen Burns

    Quick Reads

  • Ahmad Anani, Jihane Rizk and Sevcan Aydemir write for Wealth Briefing on the rise of private equity in Middle East family businesses

    Ahmad Anani

    In the Press

  • PISCES Regulations come into force today

    Jodie Dennis

    Quick Reads

  • London International Disputes Week: Navigating International M&A Disputes: Insights and Strategies for 2025

    Stephen Burns

    Events

  • Detailed analysis of new Government guidance for businesses on Modern Slavery Act section 54 statements

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Unlocking Opportunities: Introduction of the Re-domiciliation Regime in Hong Kong

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

  • From Tradition to Transaction - The Rise of Private Equity in Family Businesses in the Middle East

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

  • Thomas Snider and Adrian Mayer write for African Law & Business on rising levels of private investment between the UAE and Africa

    Adrian Mayer

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Country Court Care on its acquisition of assets from Retirement Villages Group

    Mark White

    News

  • Governance & Succession for Family-Owned Businesses

    Hamish Perry

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the shareholders of Stow Healthcare Group Limited on the sale of the company to CGEN Care Group

    David Coates

    News

  • The Times quotes Hamish Perry on identity fraud on Companies House

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • The Economic Times interviews Kim Lalli on the UK-India Free Trade Agreement

    Kim Lalli

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys represents Europlasma in its strategic takeover of Fonderie de Bretagne

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys International Promotions 2025

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises AgDevCo on its investment from BII, Norfund and Swedfund

    Adrian Mayer

    News

Back to top