• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Performance of contractual duties under Swiss law and COVID-19 health crisis

With the current COVID-19 crisis, companies face multiple challenges on how to deal with the performance of their contractual duties. This article gives an overview of the rights and duties of such companies and advice on how they should deal with customers’ requests when the contract is governed by Swiss law. 

According to Swiss law, an obligation is deemed extinguished where its performance is made impossible by circumstances not attributable to the obligor. Only an impossibility that is final justifies the application of this rule. Impossibility is considered final when there is no prospect that the impediment will disappear. 

A temporary impediment may however be considered as final when it calls into question the achievement of the purpose of the contract and thus the impeded party cannot in good faith expect the other party to fulfil the agreement. 

This will be the case for instance when the performance of services only make sense before a certain date given that they were linked to a scheduled event. 

In case of impossibility considered as final, in bilateral contracts, the obligation is deemed extinguished and the obligor released by impossibility must return the consideration already received and loses his counterclaim to the extent it has not yet been satisfied. The party prevented to fulfil its contractual duties is protected by Swiss law but only if it demonstrates that the impediment results from circumstances not attributable to it. The obligor should be prepared to demonstrate that external circumstances related to the COVID-19 crisis caused the impediment. 

Apart from the cases where impossibility could be considered as final according to the above, in many occurrences the circumstances triggered by the COVID-19 crisis will be considered as a temporary impediment only. This can be the case for companies that have their delivery trucks blocked at a border or for companies which have a reduced production capacity because they have to implement the social distancing guidelines issued by governmental bodies in their factory. In the area of service providers, performance of services might be prevented by travel restrictions applying to staff planned to perform such services. 

Where the impediment is temporary, the obligations of the impeded party will not be deemed extinguished. The counterparty can set a grace period to the supplier, which has to be appropriate. Upon receipt of the notification of such grace period, the supplier should check if it would be capable of meeting the set deadline. If it knows it will not in the circumstances it is facing, it has to react immediately and offer to perform within a deadline that it deems in turn appropriate. 

If the supplier does not perform its duty within the grace period, the counterparty has three options:

  1. continue to insist on performance and claim for damages due to the delay,
  2. waive performance and claim damages for non-performance or
  3. terminate the agreement.

It has however to be noted that the party prevented to perform will not be liable for damages if it can prove that it is not at fault. As the COVID-19 crisis could be a basis of proof that a party is not at fault, and hence it will not be in a position to successfully claim for damages, the counterparty should insist on performance rather than terminate the agreement except where, at the stage where it has to make such decision, the performance of the delivery or of the services is no longer useful for it. On their side, suppliers should be aware that they face termination of contracts by their counterparties even if their failure to perform is due to the COVID-19 crisis and they are not at fault. 

In any case, in order to avoid any problem of liability for damages, suppliers and services providers should document in what manner the health crisis prevents them to respect the delivery deadlines or perform their services. Such explanation should be as detailed as possible. A general reference to the COVID-19 crisis is not likely to be deemed sufficient to prove that they are not at fault. 

It might be that customers have put their requests for performance on hold and have not set any grace periods yet due to the health crisis. Suppliers and service providers should however be prepared for the time when the health crisis is declared to be over as it is likely that they will be flooded with short deadline requests for performance. Depending on the resources they expect to have available then, it might be worth already giving thoughts about the deliveries and services they will prioritize.

This article was written by Christophe Levet at Charles Russell Speechlys. For more information, please contact Christophe on +41 (0)22 591 18 56 or at christophe.levet@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • Doing business in the UAE & Israel

    William Reichert

    Events

  • Drone deliveries: Be Prepared

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its £3.5 million investment into TravelLocal

    David Coates

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer

    News

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Hamish Perry and Mike Barrington write for The Evening Standard on whether a merger between the CBI and Make UK can work

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • Silicon quotes Gareth Mills on the UK consumer lawsuit against Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Case analysis: URS Corporation Ltd V BDW Trading Ltd

    James Worthington

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Ashwin Pillay on the latest round of ONS M&A statistics

    Ashwin Pillay

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Predator Oil & Gas Holdings plc on its successful placing of New Ordinary Shares to the London Stock Exchange

    Andrew Collins

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the discoverIE Group on its acquisition of Silvertel

    Mark Howard

    News

  • Bloomberg and The Washington Post quote Richard Davies on multiclub ownership in world sports

    Richard Davies

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its £5m investment into Pockit Limited

    David Coates

    News

  • Product compliance and Brexit - UK Government concedes to CE markings indefinite recognition

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • UAE and the Grey List: Brief Update

    Karl Masi

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Tom Smitham on private equity investment into European football

    Tom Smitham

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Thomas Sandgaard on the sale of Charlton Athletic

    Keir Gordon

    News

  • A Summer of Sport - Top 5 Legal Considerations

    Anna Sowerby

    Insights

  • The Times quotes James Broadhurst on the rise of the co-founder 'pre-nup'

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its investment into Thingtrax Limited

    David Coates

    News

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Les défaillances en France proches de leur niveau de 2019 - French insolvencies close to 2019 levels

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Casino Group: An agreement with investors and debt holders is expected at the end of July

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • DIAC Issues First Annual Report

    Georgia Fullarton

    Quick Reads

  • One year on: "Influencer Culture: lights, camera, inaction" remains astonishingly accurate

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

  • Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration publishes new Arbitration Rules

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • UK immigration and international surrogacy update – will the Law Commission report change an aged system?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • WhatsAppGate - Should businesses be reviewing their social media policies?

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

  • Missed deadline for registering on the overseas entity register

    Sarah Morley

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai announces its plan to streamline the enforcement of civil judgments and arbitral awards

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Sign of the times - the British record football transfer which very nearly didn't happen

    Pei Li Kew

    Quick Reads

  • No love (island) lost for the #muffboss – #ad is great but don’t forget the other ad rules

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

  • Is it really against the law to share your Netflix password?

    Quick Reads

  • Commercial service charges: "pay now, argue later"!

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Omnichannel innovation essential in the face of outlet decline

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

  • Brand owners now required to police influencers

    Katie Bewick

    Quick Reads

  • Celebrating Charitable and Philanthropic Initiatives

    George Bull

    Quick Reads

Back to top