• news-banner

    Expert Insights

MP’s to Investigate the ‘Economic Impact’ of Music Streaming

Much to the delight of the music industry, the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (DCMS) announced on 15 October 2020 that an inquiry is to be launched into the economics of the music streaming industry.

The Context of the Inquiry

The inquiry appears set to examine the following aspects of the global music streaming industry:

  1. The ‘business models’ operated by music streaming service providers and whether, in their present state, they promote sustainability for the music industry at large;
  2. Whether the ‘algorithmic curation’ of playlists unfairly balances listenership figures in favour of more established artists; and
  3. How the Government can protect the industry from knock-on effects, such as the increased piracy of music.

Reading between the lines of the specific inquiries, the Committee appears primarily concerned with addressing the commonly referenced ‘value gap’ in the music industry.

The ‘value gap’ is the term used to illustrate the disparity between the revenue the music streaming giants generate and what the artists receive as royalties. To exemplify the disparity, the DCMS note that streaming giants such as Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and Google Play account for over 50% of the revenue of the global music industry and its contributors receive as little as 13% of this revenue. To flesh this out further on a localised scale, of the 114 billion music streams which took place in the UK last year, over £1 billion revenue was generated. Of this £1 billion revenue, Spotify is thought to pay its artists between £0.002 and £0.0038 per stream, with Apple Music paying around £0.0059.

The Contents of the Inquiry

As noted, the Committee have called for the submission of evidence on the following:

Dominant Business Models

The Committee seek submissions as to the dominant business models of the platforms that offer streaming, how these differ among competitors and whether there are alternative models available. With the Committee “hoping that the inquiry will show that a more equitable model is possible” it appears that the inquiry may begin with the presumption that the market presently adopts an inequitable position.

Consumer Influence

The Committee also seeks submissions as to whether the new features associated with streaming platforms, such as the algorithmic curation of music or company sponsored playlists, influences consumer habits and tastes. With the rise of company sponsored playlists such as those promoted by Gymshark (music for exercise) and KFC (which exclusively includes tracks which reference the fast-food chain) the Committee are concerned that despite these algorithms maximising income from streaming “they are a blunt tool to operate in a creative industry with emerging talent risking falling at the first hurdle”. Whilst as the listener we may at times be grateful for curated playlists, there is an inherent risk that our ears are being pointed away from newcomers to the industry and directed towards established artists with a consistent audience and marketability.


Aside from the intricacies of music streaming services, the Committee have also expressed their concerns with how the Government can protect the industry from any knock-on effects, such as the increased piracy of music and whether the UK needs an equivalent of the Copyright Directive in response. The Committee recognises that the piracy of music remains a large contributor towards the ‘value gap’.


In the short term, the inquiry looks to examine whether the ‘business models’ used by the music streaming giants inherently disadvantage the performers and writers that provide the streamed material. Longer term, the inquiry seeks to examine the implications of streaming on the music industry, including for artists, record labels, record shops, etc. The Musicians’ Union for one, welcomed the inquiry, particularly following concerns about the amplification of the ‘value gap’ throughout the COVID-19 pandemic with artists losing touring as their main revenue stream.

Deadline for submissions

The call for evidence by the Committee extends to all those involved in the music streaming industry such as industry experts, artists and record labels as well as streaming platforms themselves. Evidence is to be submitted by 6pm on Monday 16 November 2020 via the following link



Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2023

    Charlotte Ford


  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley


  • Arbitration Act 1996: Law Commission recommends limited changes

    Richard Kiddell


  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Nortal on its acquisition of Questers

    Hamish Perry


  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands presence in Greater China with the arrival of Litigation and Dispute Resolution Partner Stephen Chan

    Stephen Chan


  • Family and Employment law assistance in legal advice deserts

    Sarah Farrelly


  • Property Patter: the latest on the Building Safety Act

    Richard Flenley


  • James Souter writes for City AM on Meta pulling out of its London office

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • Ciara Coyle writes for People Management on ways to ensure ‘invisible’ workers do not go unrecognised

    Ciara Coyle

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its £3.5 million investment into TravelLocal

    David Coates


  • Georgina Muskett and Karin Mouhon write for Property Week on the importance of preparation when proposing site redevelopments

    Karin Mouhon

    In the Press

  • The Evening Standard quotes Rose Carey on the increase in visa fees

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Spears quotes Piers Master on the potential exodus of UHNW non-doms from the UK ahead of a potential Labour government

    Piers Master

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard


  • David Savage writes for Construction News on the upcoming building-control overhaul

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho


  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer


  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Casino Group: An agreement with investors and debt holders is expected at the end of July

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • The only way for Eastgate: Another shopping centre enters administration

    Chelsea Morgan

    Quick Reads

  • 2020: Influencer, 2021: Creative Director – what could go wrong?

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

Back to top