• news-banner

    Expert Insights

MP’s to Investigate the ‘Economic Impact’ of Music Streaming

Much to the delight of the music industry, the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (DCMS) announced on 15 October 2020 that an inquiry is to be launched into the economics of the music streaming industry.

The Context of the Inquiry

The inquiry appears set to examine the following aspects of the global music streaming industry:

  1. The ‘business models’ operated by music streaming service providers and whether, in their present state, they promote sustainability for the music industry at large;
  2. Whether the ‘algorithmic curation’ of playlists unfairly balances listenership figures in favour of more established artists; and
  3. How the Government can protect the industry from knock-on effects, such as the increased piracy of music.

Reading between the lines of the specific inquiries, the Committee appears primarily concerned with addressing the commonly referenced ‘value gap’ in the music industry.

The ‘value gap’ is the term used to illustrate the disparity between the revenue the music streaming giants generate and what the artists receive as royalties. To exemplify the disparity, the DCMS note that streaming giants such as Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and Google Play account for over 50% of the revenue of the global music industry and its contributors receive as little as 13% of this revenue. To flesh this out further on a localised scale, of the 114 billion music streams which took place in the UK last year, over £1 billion revenue was generated. Of this £1 billion revenue, Spotify is thought to pay its artists between £0.002 and £0.0038 per stream, with Apple Music paying around £0.0059.

The Contents of the Inquiry

As noted, the Committee have called for the submission of evidence on the following:

Dominant Business Models

The Committee seek submissions as to the dominant business models of the platforms that offer streaming, how these differ among competitors and whether there are alternative models available. With the Committee “hoping that the inquiry will show that a more equitable model is possible” it appears that the inquiry may begin with the presumption that the market presently adopts an inequitable position.

Consumer Influence

The Committee also seeks submissions as to whether the new features associated with streaming platforms, such as the algorithmic curation of music or company sponsored playlists, influences consumer habits and tastes. With the rise of company sponsored playlists such as those promoted by Gymshark (music for exercise) and KFC (which exclusively includes tracks which reference the fast-food chain) the Committee are concerned that despite these algorithms maximising income from streaming “they are a blunt tool to operate in a creative industry with emerging talent risking falling at the first hurdle”. Whilst as the listener we may at times be grateful for curated playlists, there is an inherent risk that our ears are being pointed away from newcomers to the industry and directed towards established artists with a consistent audience and marketability.

Copyright

Aside from the intricacies of music streaming services, the Committee have also expressed their concerns with how the Government can protect the industry from any knock-on effects, such as the increased piracy of music and whether the UK needs an equivalent of the Copyright Directive in response. The Committee recognises that the piracy of music remains a large contributor towards the ‘value gap’.

Conclusion

In the short term, the inquiry looks to examine whether the ‘business models’ used by the music streaming giants inherently disadvantage the performers and writers that provide the streamed material. Longer term, the inquiry seeks to examine the implications of streaming on the music industry, including for artists, record labels, record shops, etc. The Musicians’ Union for one, welcomed the inquiry, particularly following concerns about the amplification of the ‘value gap’ throughout the COVID-19 pandemic with artists losing touring as their main revenue stream.

Deadline for submissions

The call for evidence by the Committee extends to all those involved in the music streaming industry such as industry experts, artists and record labels as well as streaming platforms themselves. Evidence is to be submitted by 6pm on Monday 16 November 2020 via the following link

 



 

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Solicitor's "SLAPP" ruling overturned

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

  • Avoid Airport Anxiety: Check your passport can be used for travel to the UK – Rules change significantly on 25 February 2026, especially dual-nationals

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Breaking Board Deadlocks: High Court Webster ruling expands shareholder remedies against uncooperative boards

    Jana Billington

    Insights

  • FT Adviser features Abigail Rushton and Richard Burger on the SFO's refreshed compliance guidance

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

  • Dubai Courts Enable Private Enforcement of Court Orders

    Maher Al Nashar

    Quick Reads

  • Hilde Braaten Resseth writes for Family Law Journal comparing parental responsibility laws in Norway, England and Wales

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    In the Press

  • Family Law Journal features Jamie Kennaugh, Hanh Nguyen, Francesca Heath-Clarke, Charlotte Posnansky, and Daniel Staunton on the interplay between family and insolvency law

    Hanh Nguyen

    In the Press

  • Supply chain and ESG data requests

    Megan Gray

    Insights

  • Batteries in the EU as a part of a greener economy

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

  • eprivateclient profiles Suzanne Marriott, Head of Art & Luxury

    Suzanne Marriott

    In the Press

  • Tom Smitham writes for City AM on the growing investor appetite for sports assets

    Tom Smitham

    In the Press

  • The future is looking bright for Hong Kong-ers under the BN(O) route

    Owen Chan

    Quick Reads

  • What does the new NPPF mean for data centres?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Litigation in the Spotlight: Navigating Reputational Risk Under the Access to Court Documents Pilot

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

  • Beyond the Feed: Protecting Children’s Mental Health in Family Proceedings

    Jessica Dawkins

    Quick Reads

  • Landlords take note: Court Appeal applies residential statutory service charge regime to live/work units

    Chandni Pandya

    Quick Reads

  • Court confirms an assignee’s right to adjudicate a dispute under a construction contract: Paragon Group v FK Facades

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

Back to top