• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Is it OK to propose an NDA?

min read

Background

In anticipation of new government legislation, Acas has published guidance on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), which looks to provide clarity on how to prevent their misuse and how to adopt good working practices when working with NDAs. This new guidance comes a few months after the Equality and Human Rights Commission published their own guidance on the same.

We recommend reading Acas’ guidance in full, but this article will set out its key takeaways.

NDAs and their misuse

The guide refers to NDAs as ‘confidentiality clauses’ throughout and considers their use in three contractual contexts whilst giving examples:

  1. settlement agreements;
  2. Acas settlements; and
  3. employment contracts.

NDAs are further distinguished between those that seek to keep particular details of an agreement confidential and those seeking to keep the fact an agreement has been made confidential. The guide states that NDAs which fall into any of the above categories may be inappropriate, depending on the circumstances.

According to Acas, NDAs should not be a matter of routine for businesses and institutions and importantly should not stop anyone from:

  1. reporting discrimination or sexual harassment at work or to the police;
  2. whistleblowing; or
  3. disclosing a future act of discrimination or harassment.

The guide outlines, with examples, how to tackle the misuse of NDAs and also provides situations in which NDAs should be avoided, e.g. where an NDA is used as an intimidation tactic or threat. The matters which give rise to the proposed NDA should instead be dealt with using robust internal procedures to safeguard both employees and employers, with the intention of creating a more open and safer workplace. The overarching principle is that NDAs should not be a matter of routine. Instead, Acas advises that alternative mechanisms and approaches should be considered prior to considering whether an NDA would be appropriate. Examples of such mechanisms include training management and employees as to how to deal with specific issues and implementing robust whistleblowing, disciplinary and grievance policies.

Good practice

The guide also suggests that employers should regularly monitor any policy or procedure which could result in the use of an NDA or confidentiality clause, or even be affected by one. Acas believe that adopting such a practice will encourage organisations to learn how to use NDAs appropriately. The example used in the guide notes that across an organisation, one department may find themselves using NDAs three times as often as another department. If the department heads came together to discuss and share good practice techniques, the use of NDAs has the potential to be reduced.

Acas’ guide helpfully contains numerous good practice principles which cover the lifecycle of and NDA from initial discussions, proposing the NDA, negotiating and the drafting of the NDA. Discussions should always be carried out in a sensitive manner and provide informative solutions. Proposal of an NDA should never become a standard approach and careful consideration must be given to whether an NDA is appropriate for the matter at hand. Employees must also be given sufficient time to make an informed decision surrounding the NDA and good practice would dictate that such employees are to be accompanied by a work colleague or trade union representative during discussions and negotiations – although this is not a legal obligation. NDAs must be written in clear, plain English to avoid any ambiguity on the part of an employee or layman.

Comment

It is important to note that Acas’ guidance is not statutory and so tribunals are not obliged to take it into account if a dispute regarding an NDA arises. That being said, its use as evidence in proceedings may prove useful due to its clarity in setting out the misuse of NDAs and good practice.

There is new government legislation on NDAs in the pipeline. However, in the interim Acas’ guide is a good reference point for organisations wishing to position themselves healthily with clear policies and procedures relating to NDAs and confidentiality clauses. With high profile cases based on the misuse of NDAs in the public eye, particularly following the #MeToo movement, now is the time for employers to take responsibility for the safety and openness of their workplaces and employees.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Pay Up or We'll Tell All: The High Court's Firm Stance on Blackmail in Privacy Cases

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top