• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Closing the loopholes on economic crime

Last month, the Select Committee concluded their enquiry into Economic Crime that has been ongoing for the last 2 years and the Economic Crime Report (the Report) was finally published.  A main recommendation of the Report was for an Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill (the Bill) to be put forward by the Government to assist in the fight against fraud and all forms of economic crime. 

The Report identified three main topics of focus: i) Companies House reform; ii) reform of corporate criminal liability laws; and iii) registration of beneficial ownership of UK property.

Companies House reforms will focus on the combined problem of minimal verification on the identity of the beneficial owners of companies registered in the UK and low incorporation fees providing the ideal conditions to be taken advantage of by anonymous shell companies involved in suspicious transactions linked to criminal activity. Proposals as to the way such lack could be addressed and improved focus on matters such as: the introduction of compulsory identity verification for all company directors and those with significant control, as well as those filing information on behalf of a company; and also giving the registrar of companies stronger powers to query, seek evidence for, amend or remove information and share it with law enforcement partners.

The Report also recommends that the Government act swiftly in the introduction of legislation emanating from the corporate criminal liability review being carried out by the Law Commission, likely due in the spring.  One such area will be addressing the matter of making it significantly more straightforward to hold accountable both companies and their senior management for crimes committed for their benefit.

From a real estate perspective, it was back in 2018 that the Registration of Overseas Entities Bill was drafted with the aim of increasing the transparency of beneficial property ownership in the UK.  For years, real estate transactions have been widely seen as a classic medium for money laundering and it has long been thought that a great deal more could and should be done to contribute to calling a halt to such activity.

Latest update:

On 1 March, in response to the conflict in Ukraine and with the spotlight firmly on Russian money in the UK, the government brought forward the Bill, the aim being to make it significantly more difficult for people to hide their wealth in the UK, especially from overseas, including criminals and those simply wanting to conceal illicitly acquired money, particularly through property purchases.  In terms of the key elements of the Bill:

Register of overseas UK land ownership

The introduction of a new register of overseas entities will accordingly result in a list of the true identities of the ultimate owners of property or land in the UK bought by overseas individuals or companies.  Failure to comply will result in restrictions being placed on selling those properties and those who are found to have broken the rules will face up to five years in prison. The legislation will apply retrospectively to property bought by overseas owners up to 20 years ago.

Sanctions

The Bill makes it easier for the sanctioning of individuals as it introduces a ‘strict civil liability’ test for monetary penalties, meaning that liability will fall even where the entity concerned has no knowledge or reasonable cause to suspect that a transaction to which they are party is in breach of sanctions.  Consequently it will be significantly easier in practice for fines to be imposed and with those fines being a civil liability.  The Office for Financial Sanctions Implementation will still be able to prosecute businesses for breaches of financial sanctions where it can show there is knowledge or reasonable cause to suspect, whilst also permitting the Office to publicly name organisations that have breached financial sanctions, even in situations where no fine was actually imposed.  It is this risk of potential reputational damage, together with the financial penalties that the government is counting on for ensuring compliance.

Unexplained wealth orders

Such orders are to be significantly tightened, meaning that explanations will have to be given by the individuals concerned as to how they gained their money.  The hope being, of course, that it will catch out those who are suspected of gaining money through illicit or criminal means.

More powers for investigators

Investigators will be permitted to target people who manage properties within complicated offshore arrangements, even when they are not the actual beneficiary.  The National Crime Agency will also be given more legal time to prepare cases for court and importantly, also be protected against the huge related legal costs, providing it acts reasonably and properly.

The Bill has been fast tracked and on 7 March, it was passed by MPs. It is now with the House of Lords and is expected to become law later this month.

Taken overall, it can only be seen as a beneficial, if long overdue step, in improving the transparency of property ownership in the UK and in the creation of a new register of overseas entities.  Of course there remains the risk that an ultimate beneficial owner is still listed as another company and if this is the case then the problem of multi-layered and opaque property ownership structures remains unsolved. It has already been recognised by the Home Secretary that a second bill will be required because the current Bill does not go far enough and loopholes will need to be closed. However, for the time being, at least these significant steps are being swiftly taken to crackdown as far as possible.


For more information on the above please contact Naomi Heathcote or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Fiona Edmond writes for The Law Society Gazette on taking maternity leave as a Deputy Senior Partner

    Fiona Edmond

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Annie Green write for Employee Benefits on the impact of dropping the real living wage pledge

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Planning and Life Sciences: the challenges and opportunities in the Golden Triangle

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • London’s Knowledge Clusters: From Emerging to Maturing – Start Ups on the Global Stage?

    Lynsey Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • It’s not just a High Court decision, it’s a successful M&S High Court Decision

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: when can an enforcement notice against an unlawful use also require the removal of related structures?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Good news for users of the Madrid System

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Michael Gove's announcement on transitional period for two staircase requirement for new residential buildings

    Melanie Hardingham

    Quick Reads

  • Navratri at Charles Russell Speechlys

    Arjun Thakrar

    Quick Reads

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

Back to top