Q&A: If an assured tenant signs a new tenancy agreement, does it remain an assured tenancy or become an assured shorthold tenancy?
Section 19A of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988) provides that an assured tenancy entered into after the day section 96 of the Housing Act 1996 came into force (28 February 1997) is automatically an assured shorthold tenancy. For this reason the vast majority of new tenancies entered into in England are assured shorthold tenancies. HA 1988, s 19A is however subject to the exceptions in HA 1988, Sch 2A.
HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(1), provides that an exemption to the automatic application of assured shorthold tenancies is where an assured tenancy is granted to someone who immediately before the grant of the tenancy held an assured tenancy, either alone or jointly with others. This is subject to the requirement that the landlord remains the same, though again in cases where there are joint landlords it is sufficient that only one of the landlords was the landlord under the old tenancy.
This means that a tenant renewing their tenancy of the same premises with the same landlord will not be required to take a tenancy with weaker security of tenure provisions (HA 1988, s 21 does not apply to assured tenancies) as a result of HA 1988, s 19A. If a joint tenant moves out, then the remaining tenant will not lose their right to an assured tenancy.
The other requirement for the exemption set out in HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(1) to apply is that no notice is served pursuant to HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(2). This notice must be served before the assured tenancy is to be entered into, must be served by the tenant(s) on the landlord(s) (if there are joint landlords, service on one is sufficient) and state that the tenant(s) wants the new tenancy to be an assured shorthold tenancy.
If no notice is served, then provided that the tenancy is of the same premises as the previous assured tenancy and at least one of the tenants and the landlords are the same, then the tenancy will not be an assured shorthold tenancy. It is important to note the requirement that the tenant must have held an assured tenancy ‘immediately’ before the grant of the new tenancy. A short delay may be enough to mean that the exemption is not applicable.
This content was written by Oliver Park at Charles Russell Speechlys and was first published on the Lexis Nexis Ask Forum on 13 August 2020. For more information, please contact Oliver or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.
The Future of Property Careers
Join to our panel discussion and Q&A with industry leaders on the range of opportunities within the property and construction sector.
Dual class share structures: how do they work and what are the pros and cons?
Dual class share structures allow a shareholder, for example the founder, to retain voting control over a company.
Q&A: Talking the telecoms talk
Georgina Muskett and Jonathan Wills answer queries on Electronic Communications Code agreement.
Property Patter: Navigating the complexities of Pharmacy Property
Pharmacy property is a specialist area which contains many traps for the unwary.
COVID-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?
We review what legal issues to take into account when considering to make vaccination compulsory as an employer.
Linking ESG and Executive Pay
How does a business go about embedding a focus on strong ESG performance into the structures and culture of its organisation?
National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent
The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other transactions that could threaten national security.
Recent Trends In Firewall Legislation: BVI, Bermuda And Gibraltar
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Waverton on acquisition of Cornerstone Asset Management
Established in July 2010 and with offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Cornerstone offers wealth management and financial planning advice.
What do the new Debt Respite Scheme Regulations mean for Landlords and Tenants?
This will provide legal protection from creditors in the form of either a breathing space or a mental health crisis moratorium.
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes five to Partner
The promotions are effective 1 May 2021 and are accompanied by one Legal Director and 15 Senior Associate promotions.
Risk allocation in commercial leases: the High Court considers rent suspension, insurance and frustration arguments
Read our summary of the full judgement on the latest Covid arrears case.
Charles Russell Speechlys boosts private wealth offering with the hire of an international tax team
Robert Reymond will be joined at the firm by Leigh Nicoll, Emma Tyrrell and Oliver Cooper.
Proposed Takeover Code Amendments – Key Changes
The Consultation Paper has now been followed by a corresponding response paper which made certain modifications to the initial proposals.
Building Back Better: Future Gazing
What’s next for the hospitality industry post-pandemic?
Building Back Better: Re-examining your proposition
Why hospitality businesses should re-examine their proposition now
Building Back Better: Real Estate and Restructuring
How and why should hospitality businesses re-structure post pandemic?
Asian Legal Business, Hubbis and eprivateclient report on the firm's expansion in Hong Kong
The firm's Hong Kong office continues to expand with the relocation of Real Estate Partner Simon Green to lead the firm’s focus in Asia.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Fudco Partnership on sale to Exponent-backed Vibrant Foods
Fudco is a family-owned business selling South Asian ethnic foods in UK and Europe.