• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Government code published for commercial property arrears during COVID-19

The government announced at the end of May that it was working with certain businesses and trade associations to produce a code of practice to support high street businesses through coronavirus. The code has now been published in preparation for the next quarter on 24 June 2020 and it is intended to remain in place for a year. 

The code applies to commercial property and aims to facilitate discussions between landlords and tenants by “communicating best practice and presenting a unified approach”. However, its approach may be of limited use given that it is merely voluntary, there is no intention to alter existing legal arrangements and the majority of the guidelines simply confirm the approach which most landlords and tenants are already adopting, namely to try to negotiate alternative rent arrangements. No doubt to counter this potential criticism, the publication of the code was accompanied by a government announcement that the restrictions on options such as forfeiture, CRAR and winding-up petitions were being extended until 30 September. (These restrictions have, of course, been extended again since then.)

Key elements of the code’s guidance

Despite the inevitable limitations of the code, there are some elements which may help to support parties as they continue to progress discussions in preparation for the June quarter. In particular, the code:

  • Reminds tenants that rent is one of the costs for which government support has been provided to businesses;
  • Suggests that tenants should prioritise paying service charges and insurance in full so far as possible, with landlords to review the extent to which service charges should now be varied according to how the use of the property has changed during the current crisis;
  • Encourages parties to act reasonably, transparently and in good faith, including by providing financial information to justify their position on proposed rental payments (where appropriate and relevant); and
  • Accepts that landlords will need to take into account their own financial commitments and fiduciary duties, where applicable.

The code repeats the guidance already circulated by the government that those tenants who can afford to pay their rent should do so, or at least pay what they can (taking into account the alternative financial resources which may be available to them). The code emphasises that payments by these tenants are part of the solution to help landlords to support those tenants who are in greater need, as well as to maintain the development activity which will contribute to the UK’s economic recovery. 

The overall approach seems to reflect recognition by government that the support offered to businesses needs to be proportionate and targeted, with particular mention of the difficulties for those in the hospitality, leisure and retail sectors. The code encourages tenants “experiencing temporary severe hardship as a result of the impact of coronavirus” to approach their landlords to discuss a request for support. 

Likely areas of concern

Parties are likely to be disappointed that the example rental arrangements set out in the code are nothing new, e.g. rent deferrals, monthly rents, or a rent-free period in return for the removal of a break option.  Moreover, tenants will note that the code does not suggest that all requests for flexibility should be accommodated; a landlord is entitled to review the details of the tenant’s position and to make an assessment as to whether or not this is a temporary situation which might be accommodated and alleviated through some temporary adjustment to the tenants’ lease obligations. 

The code contains a list of factors for parties to bear in mind in assessing the extent to which a tenant’s financial position has been impacted by the pandemic, including any extra costs involved with protecting customers, how any government support has been used and the tenant’s previous track record in adhering to its lease.

Some landlords will be concerned to see that there is still no specific financial support for landlords within the sector; only encouragement to engage with their lenders to seek flexible support in relation to their existing financial arrangements.  Equally, there is no concrete reassurance for landlords that they will not be prejudiced in any subsequent insolvency situation by accommodating their tenants’ needs and delaying the implementation of recovery action.  

Next steps

The government will monitor how the code works in practice and has indicated that it may be prepared to intervene further.  However, the new code points out that the measures which have been taken to restrict landlords’ options for arrears recovery and give a breathing space to tenant businesses cannot last forever and all parties are encouraged to work together “on a plan for a sustainable future”.

Please note: This briefing note is intended to be a general statement of the law and legal advice should be taken on your specific circumstances.

The code was updated in November 2021 and can be found here. For a summary of how the new code works and the government’s proposed draft Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill please click here.

Please don't hesitate to contact Emma Humphreys or any member of the Real Estate Disputes team if you have any queries. 

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Fiona Edmond writes for The Law Society Gazette on taking maternity leave as a Deputy Senior Partner

    Fiona Edmond

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Annie Green write for Employee Benefits on the impact of dropping the real living wage pledge

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

Back to top