Update on deadlines in light of COVID-19
The coronavirus outbreak continues to cause huge challenges globally to both individuals and businesses. A number of the intellectual property offices in Europe have further revised their position with regard to deadlines:
UKIPO – The Intellectual Property Office declared 24 March 2020 and all subsequent days, until further notice, to be interrupted days. All UKIPO deadlines from 24 March onwards are therefore extended until the position is changed and normal operation resumes. This extension applies to all time periods set out in the UK Acts and Rules, and to all non-statutory deadlines set in correspondence by UKIPO staff. However, Notices of Threatened Opposition (TM7A) must still be filed within two months of the publication date of the application. The UKIPO will review the position again on 7 May 2020.
EUIPO – All deadlines have been further extended by the EUIPO. Therefore, all deadlines expiring between 9 March and 17 May are automatically extended until 18 May 2020. This extension covers all procedural deadlines, whether set in correspondence from the EUIPO or those set out in the Rules and Regulations. This does not apply to deadlines to further appeal Board of Appeal decisions to the General Court, which remain as originally set.
WIPO – deadlines remain as originally set but there are steps that can be taken if deadlines are missed. Evidence for the reason why the deadline was missed may be required. However, where a time limit involves an IP office that is closed, and the response must be sent to that office (e.g. when responding to a notification of provisional refusal issued by the closed office), the deadline would be extended in accordance with directions issued by that closed office.
Other national offices in the EU have varying procedures. In relation to courts, in England, along with both the General Court and Court of Justice of the EU, the deadlines generally remain as set. For the Court of Justice of the EU, whilst the time limits for lodging an appeal remain, where proceedings are on-going and non-urgent, time limits are being extended by one month. By contrast, the General Court has advised that time limits continue to run and parties are required to comply with those time limits.
It is always worth checking whether a deadline has been automatically extended before expiry, and still to meet that original deadline where possible to keep matters moving.
Please do contact us if you would like further advice.
Charlotte Duly writes for Intellectual Property Magazine on the implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision in SkyKick on both bad faith and specification drafting
Trademark law was dominated by SkyKick in 2020 and it was in the spotlight again in 2021 following a Court of Appeal judgment in July.
Nick White writes for Intellectual Property Magazine on the ever-expanding role of licensed content within the video gaming industry
Consumers’ unwitting assumptions: A [wh]iskey business in brand competition
Olivia and Anna look at the Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd v Sazerac Brands LLC case and the question of 'indirect confusion'
Mark Hill and Lara Haidar write for The Legal 500 Country Comparative Guide on Intellectual Property in the United Arab Emirates
An overview of the latest intellectual property laws and regulations applicable in United Arab Emirates.
Charlotte Duly quoted by Intellectual Property Magazine on the implications of the Court of Appeal's decision in Sky Ltd & Ors v SkyKick, UK Ltd & Anor
The Court of Appeal offered clarification on bad faith trade marks, after issuing a decision in Sky Ltd & Ors v SkyKick, UK Ltd & Anor.
Blue Sky Linking
Daniel looks at Sky's recent success in obtaining interim protection from infringement of their broadcast rights
Mary Bagnall writes for Intellectual Property Magazine on the government’s consultation document on the future regime for exhaustion of UK IP rights
The UK government has published its consultation document on the future regime for exhaustion of UK IP rights.
Bullfighting ... as a copyright work?
Joint and several liability for IP infringement - Directors beware
Olivia takes an in-depth look at the recent Lifestyle Equities v Ahmed case in the Court of Appeal
Brexit: Trade Marks and Designs
Charlotte outlines all you need to know before the next post-Brexit deadline on trade marks and designs
Anna Sowerby writes for The Fashion Law on the new collaborative approach being taken by luxury brands and online platforms to fight fakes
Online platforms are now under pressure to be more proactive in their approach to tackling the ever-escalating issue of counterfeit goods.
Antiques Trade Gazette and eprivateclient cover this firm's hire of art and luxury asset specialist Chris Haywood in Dubai
Chris joins the firm as a Senior Associate in the Dubai office.
Pfizer, Ted Danson and the Olympic Vaccine Solution
#cake – a trial by social media
Brexit and intellectual property: Gibraltar, the Isle of Man and
Charlotte looks at where else trade mark and design protection may be required following Brexit.
Diversification of landed estates – a trade mark lawyer’s advice...
Mary looks at the diversification of landed estates and offers her expert advice from a trade mark perspective
Charlotte Duly writes for the Trademark Lawyer Magazine on the legal issues that tribute bands face when selecting a name
Picking a name for a tribute act that makes it clear what they offer whilst avoiding issues with the actual band can be a challenge.
Brexit and Intellectual Property: one month on
Charlotte looks at the impact of Brexit on intellectual property one month on
The Tricky Issue of Joint Authorship in Copyright Works
Where more than one person creates a work, it can be deemed ‘joint authorship’ and each has the same rights as a sole author would.