Update on deadlines in light of COVID-19
The coronavirus outbreak continues to cause huge challenges globally to both individuals and businesses. A number of the intellectual property offices in Europe have further revised their position with regard to deadlines:
UKIPO – The Intellectual Property Office declared 24 March 2020 and all subsequent days, until further notice, to be interrupted days. All UKIPO deadlines from 24 March onwards are therefore extended until the position is changed and normal operation resumes. This extension applies to all time periods set out in the UK Acts and Rules, and to all non-statutory deadlines set in correspondence by UKIPO staff. However, Notices of Threatened Opposition (TM7A) must still be filed within two months of the publication date of the application. The UKIPO will review the position again on 7 May 2020.
EUIPO – All deadlines have been further extended by the EUIPO. Therefore, all deadlines expiring between 9 March and 17 May are automatically extended until 18 May 2020. This extension covers all procedural deadlines, whether set in correspondence from the EUIPO or those set out in the Rules and Regulations. This does not apply to deadlines to further appeal Board of Appeal decisions to the General Court, which remain as originally set.
WIPO – deadlines remain as originally set but there are steps that can be taken if deadlines are missed. Evidence for the reason why the deadline was missed may be required. However, where a time limit involves an IP office that is closed, and the response must be sent to that office (e.g. when responding to a notification of provisional refusal issued by the closed office), the deadline would be extended in accordance with directions issued by that closed office.
Other national offices in the EU have varying procedures. In relation to courts, in England, along with both the General Court and Court of Justice of the EU, the deadlines generally remain as set. For the Court of Justice of the EU, whilst the time limits for lodging an appeal remain, where proceedings are on-going and non-urgent, time limits are being extended by one month. By contrast, the General Court has advised that time limits continue to run and parties are required to comply with those time limits.
It is always worth checking whether a deadline has been automatically extended before expiry, and still to meet that original deadline where possible to keep matters moving.
Please do contact us if you would like further advice.
Our thinking
Charlotte Duly
Charlotte Duly writes for CITMA Review on the China Tang trade mark infringement case
Charlotte Duly writes for CITMA Review on the China Tang trade mark infringement case
Nick White
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Symphony Holdings Limited on the sale of its PONY trade mark portfolio for USD $28 million
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Symphony Holdings Limited on the sale of its PONY trade mark portfolio for USD $28 million.
Natalie Batra
Patents and Peppa Pig: What is happening to intellectual property rights in Russia?
Certain Russian individuals and businesses can now use patents, utility models and industrial designs without obtaining prior permission.
Charlotte Duly
Charlotte Duly quoted in Retail Gazette on House of Zana trademark dispute
Charlotte Duly quoted in Retail Gazette on House of Zana trademark dispute
Durra Al Ali
Durra Al Ali and Simon Heatley write about disclosure duties for Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Disclosure duties for clients and their lawyers
Mark Hill
Mark Hill quoted in The Times on the Ed Sheeran High Court copyright case win
Mark Hill quoted in The Times on the Ed Sheeran High Court copyright case win
Mark Hill
Mark Hill quoted in the Daily Mail discussing Ed Sheeran’s copyright court case win
Mark Hill quoted in the Daily Mail discussing Ed Sheeran’s copyright court case win
Mary Bagnall
Mary Bagnall quoted by CITMA Review on the importance of mental health campaigns
Having leaders involved in mental health campaigns signals support, encouragement and understanding of the importance of mental health.
Charlotte Duly
Charlotte Duly writes for CITMA Review on on her progress as a woman in the intellectual property industry
Having it all feels closer than it ever did before.
Nick White
The problem of fakes: catching the counterfeiters
Charlotte Duly
The Jamaica Observer publish comments from Charlotte Duly on Jamaica’s accession to the Madrid Protocol
After two decades of lobbying to be listed as a member of the Madrid Protocol, Jamaica has now been successful in that effort.
Charlotte Duly
Jamaica becomes a member of the Madrid System
Charlotte Duly
Charlotte Duly co-authors A User's Guide to Trade Marks and Passing Off with Hogarth Chambers
A focus on the current law relating to the protection of registered trademarks and certain related rights.
Mark Hill
Media and Entertainment - The Changing Landscape in the Middle East #2: The Digital Context
Nick White
What Lloyd v Google means for Project Red Card
Sonia Kenawy
Can machines be inventors?
Mark Hill
Mark Hill quoted by ArtNet on the copyright dispute between French-Tunisian artist eL Seed and the Tunisian pavilion at Dubai’s World Expo
The case illustrates a growing tension around the ownership of calligraphic script in the digital era.
Lara Haidar
The United Arab Emirates Joins the Madrid System
Charlotte Duly
Charlotte Duly writes for Intellectual Property Magazine on the implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision in SkyKick on both bad faith and specification drafting
Trademark law was dominated by SkyKick in 2020 and it was in the spotlight again in 2021 following a Court of Appeal judgment in July.
Nick White
Nick White writes for Intellectual Property Magazine on the ever-expanding role of licensed content within the video gaming industry