• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Strengthening the rights of workers from April 2020 – changes to the section 1 statement

In the Good Work Plan published in December 2018 the government announced several changes to the scope of section 1 statements. The intention is to improve clarity and transparency for employees and workers alike. This is a significant change. Under the current provisions employers are required to provide employees (and not workers) with a written statement of certain particulars within two months of starting employment, but this is set to change.

The key changes from April 2020 are:

  • Extending the right to ‘workers’: The most fundamental change is that the obligation to provide a written statement of particulars will be extended to workers. This is to ensure that everyone working has the same basic level of information in relation to their terms.
  • Day one right: Rather than within two months of starting work, the majority of particulars will need to be provided on or before the date on which the engagement starts (although some details can be provided in a supplementary statement – see below).
  • Additional particulars: The actual particulars required have been expanded so that employers will also need to provide details of:
    • The days of the week the worker is required to work, whether the working hours may be variable and how any variation will be determined;
    • Any paid leave to which the worker is entitled (other than sickness and holiday, details of which are already required);
    • Any other benefits provided by the employer that are not already included in the statement;
    • Any probationary period, including any conditions and its duration; and
    • Any training entitlement provided by the employer, including whether any training is mandatory.

When does this apply?

The changes set out above will only apply to those starting work on or after 6 April 2020

Does all the information need to be in a single document?

Whilst the majority of terms must be given in one document, some can be provided in instalments and in limited circumstances details can be provided in a “reasonably accessible” document such as a staff handbook, or collective agreement.

Is there a penalty for non-compliance?

A worker can make a complaint to an employment tribunal that their employer has failed to provide a s.1 statement, or that it is inaccurate or incomplete. Where the worker has no other successful substantive claim then their only remedy will be a declaration confirming their terms. Compensation is only available where the individual has successfully brought another claim (such as unfair dismissal, or discrimination) – the right to compensation is not freestanding.  Where compensation is available it will be between 2 and 4 weeks’ pay, capped at the statutory rate.

What should employers be doing to prepare?

Whilst all employers need to revisit their template contracts to ensure compliance, the most challenging scenarios will be where casual workers on flexible arrangements are involved. Employers will therefore need to start identifying who will benefit from these changes, and what particulars the different groups of workers and employees will need.

The changes will affect all workers engaged on or after 6 April 2020 from day 1 of their engagement. Existing employees (not workers) can request from the employer a written statement complying with the new requirements, which the employer must provide within one month. 

Care should also be taken when producing s.1 compliant documents to avoid non contractual policies inadvertently being elevated to contractual status.

The government has promised further guidance, but with the changes less than 2 months away, it is hoped that this guidance is provided sooner rather than later.

 

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Fiona Edmond writes for The Law Society Gazette on taking maternity leave as a Deputy Senior Partner

    Fiona Edmond

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Annie Green write for Employee Benefits on the impact of dropping the real living wage pledge

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Planning and Life Sciences: the challenges and opportunities in the Golden Triangle

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • London’s Knowledge Clusters: From Emerging to Maturing – Start Ups on the Global Stage?

    Lynsey Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • It’s not just a High Court decision, it’s a successful M&S High Court Decision

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: when can an enforcement notice against an unlawful use also require the removal of related structures?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai Court of Cassation Extends Arbitration Agreement Across Subsequent Contracts

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Good news for users of the Madrid System

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Michael Gove's announcement on transitional period for two staircase requirement for new residential buildings

    Melanie Hardingham

    Quick Reads

  • Navratri at Charles Russell Speechlys

    Arjun Thakrar

    Quick Reads

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

Back to top