Brexit: Important copyright considerations for Broadcasters and other copyright owners
As readers will already know, we are in the Brexit transition period, meaning that EU law and treaties continue to apply to, and in, the UK. At the end of December 2020, this transition period will end and the UK will be treated as a ‘third country’, meaning that EU law and treaties will cease to apply.
Copyright, even within the EU, is generally governed by national law and varies from country to country (albeit there is a relatively high level of global and pan-EU harmonisation due to various international treaties and EU Regulations and Directives). Therefore, the general consensus is that Brexit will have little impact in the world of copyright protection and enforcement.
To a large extent this is correct, but there are some key pieces of EU legislation which will fall away in respect of the UK at the end of the transition period. Some of these could have profound effects, especially on broadcasters.
The EU Commission has issued an updated notice on the effect of Brexit on Copyright and related rights, which is a useful summary of the possible impact that broadcasters (and others) should be aware of. The notice can be accessed in full here. The UK Government has also issued guidance here.
There are a few key things that will change, notably:
UK broadcasters will no longer benefit from the Satellite and Cable Directive (93/83/EEC) when providing broadcasting services to EU customers.
This Directive provides that, when transmitting broadcasts across Member States, the act of communication is only deemed to have occurred in the Member State that the broadcast was first introduced (effectively meaning that broadcasters only have to ‘clear’ rights (i.e. get permission from the copyright owner) in the Member State where the broadcast originates).
Following the end of the transition period, UK based broadcasters will no longer be able to rely on this Directive and they will now have to clear rights in all Member States that receive the signal (depending on the national law of the Member State in relation to non-EEA broadcasts).
The UK has indicated that the country-of-origin principle will continue to be applied to broadcasts from any country so legitimate satellite broadcasts of copyright works transmitted into the UK from abroad will not need specific right holder permission for the UK, except in limited circumstances.
UK-based Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) will no longer benefit from the Collective Rights Management Directive (2014/26/EU).
Currently, EU based CMOs are obligated, in certain cases, to represent the CMOs of other Member States in multi-territorial licensing (regarding online rights in musical works).
Following the end of the transition period, this obligation falls away with respect to UK based CMOs and therefore they will need to ensure their members’ rights are represented across the EU without the benefit of these obligations.
In the UK, existing obligations on UK CMOs will be maintained. These include those specific to multi-territorial licensing of musical works for online services. UK CMOs that offer multi-territorial licensing of online rights in musical works will continue to be required to represent on request the catalogue of other CMOs (UK or EEA) for multi-territorial licensing purposes.
UK residents can no longer rely on the ‘Cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market’ Regulation (2017/1128).
Currently, when UK residents subscribe to an online content service provider in the UK, when travelling within the EU they are still able to access that content (as under the regulation, the service shall be deemed to occur solely in the subscriber’s Member State).
Following the end of the transition period, content providers will not be required to provide content to a UK customer who is travelling in the EU. They may still choose to do so, but may be liable if content is not cleared in the EU.
The mutual recognition for orphan works provided for by Orphan Works Directive (2012/28/EU) will no longer apply between the UK and the EU.
Certain institutions across the EU currently benefit form a system of mutual recognition of orphan works; meaning that once a work has been recognised in a Member State, it can be made available across the whole EU.
Following the end of the transition period, orphan works recognised in EU Member States will no longer be automatically recognised in the UK (and vice versa).
Access to copies of published works for the blind, visually impaired of otherwise print-disabled, under the Marrakesh Directive (EU) 2017/1564), will no longer apply to entities in the UK.
Currently, as a member of the EU, the UK is a member of the Marrakesh Treaty (although it is not a signatory in its own right). This means that there are various limitations and exceptions to copyright law in order to allow access to ‘accessible copies’.
Aside from this, certain entities in the UK (mainly educational and government entities) are able to obtain accessible copies of protected works from authorised entities across the EU under the Marrakesh Directive.
Following the end of the transition period, this will no longer apply to the UK and, there will be no obligations on entities within the EU to continue with this UK cross-border exchange. The UK Government has, however, indicated that the regulation and the UK’s implementation of the directive will be retained in UK law. Further, whilst the UK is not currently a signatory to the Marrakesh Treaty in its own right, the UK does intend to ratify the treaty.
There will be no reciprocal sui generis database right for UK / EU entities in the other territory
Currently, UK entities can benefit from a sui generis database right in relation to EU databases, and EU entities can similarly benefit from the right in relation to UK data bases.
Following Brexit, whilst the rights will still exist, there will be a separate UK system and EU system and residents or businesses in either will not be able to claim future rights in the other (unless they have a habitual residence there).
Databases already in existence in the UK or EEA before 1 January 2021 will continue to be protected in the UK and EEA for the rest of their duration. It is also worth noting that copyright protection in databases will not be affected.
Broadcast Clearance: UK Broadcasters should review procedures for clearing content which is broadcast to the EU. Clearance in the UK is no longer enough.
Cross-border content provision: Content providers should review policies governing use of UK cleared content in the EU by their subscribers; neither content providers nor subscribers will be able to rely on the defences in the Portability Regulation after the transition period.
Orphan works: Anyone who is using Orphan works that have been derived though authorisation by EU Member States should re assess their use of those works and explore whether further licences are needed.
Sui Generis Databases: As future database rights created in the UK will not benefit from protection across the EU, consider if there is protection under copyright law or whether some form of contractual restriction is possible.
IBA Annual Conference
The IBA heads to Miami for its 2022 Annual Conference bringing together thousands hundreds of lawyers from around the world.
Joint Venture Opportunities
Join our panel where we will discuss various topics including Joint Venture structuring and Partner procurement.
Mind your business: Safeguarding your business against loss of mental capacity
Practical considerations to safeguard your business against loss of mental capacity.
FT Wealth quotes Sarah Anticoni on forum shopping
"Being the first to file for divorce is not a foolproof way of securing an English hearing"
What can UK investors interested in Life Sciences learn from their more experienced, including US, counterparts?
The recent tie-up between Canary Wharf and Kadans demonstrates the enthusiasm to access the lucrative UK life sciences market.
Helen Coward writes for Tax Journal on the main purpose test for SDLT group relief
Mainly ignored? The main purpose test for SDLT group relief
The Ayes have it - Collateral Warranties can be a ‘Construction Contract’
The Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the case of Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Limited v Simply Construct (UK) LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Caretech Holdings PLC on its proposed £870.3 million take private
Charles Russell Speechlys is advising the independent board of Caretech Holdings PLC, in its take private sale to Amalfi Bidco Limited.
Charles Russell Speechlys advising Battery Ventures on the sale of SPT Labtech for £650 million.
Battery Ventures has raised over $9 billion to invest in software and services, enterprise infrastructure, and much more around the world.
Windrush Day 2022 – supporting access to justice
Charles Russell Speechlys is proud to continue supporting survivors of the Windrush scandal in their fight for justice.
The Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022: Landlords and developers beware serious sanctions for non-compliance
The Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022 received Royal Assent on 8 February 2022 and will come into force on 30 June 2022.
EG quotes Emma Preece on the Picturehouse and BNY Mellon rent arrears cases
“The case is being closely watched by landlords and tenants alike as the impact of the pandemic lives on in the commercial property sector”
Charles Russell Speechlys has advised long-standing client Stonegate on a series A investment into Peckwater Brands
Stonegate is one of the largest pub companies in the UK with a rich portfolio that covers over 4,500 sites.
Pro bono support for major office premises move for charity in Stoke-on-Trent
Emmaus entities provide safe homes, community support and meaningful work to formerly homeless people across the UK.
ITV takes the plunge and “couples up” with Ebay to dress love island contestants in pre-loved clothing
Reporting Restriction Order (reprised) - "Where there is no publicity there is no justice."
Financier Worldwide quotes Rachel Warren on the UK’s Economic Crime Act
Evaluating the UK’s Economic Crime Act
Julia Cox and Felicity Chapman write for International Adviser on the rise of pre-nups in the UK
Julia Cox and Felicity Chapman write for International Adviser on the rise of pre-nups
Property Patter: Reasonable Endeavours
What does it mean to use ‘best’, ‘all’ or ‘reasonable’ endeavours?
Could the UK’s Life Sciences Vision be restricted by its Immigration Policy?
We explore some of the visa options that may be open to businesses in the sector and their relative pros and cons.