• insights-banner

    In the Press

Sarah Anticoni writes for IFA Magazine on the benefits of mediation for separating couples

For many, the end of a marriage or relationship combines emotional unrest and significant financial uncertainty. The disruption can undermine the best laid financial and tax plans. 

The legal processes to end a marriage and the administrative steps to ascertain a family’s assets before embarking upon planning for a separated family’s future, can be viewed as an unwelcome distress purchase. 

In an article for IFA Magazine, Sarah Anticoni, Partner, explains why mediation is often a sensible path for separating couples, and the benefits that this option can bring.

Sarah explains:

Mediation often appeals to those who wish to have some autonomy over the decision making on their family’s finances. Rather than handing matters over to a judge who will impose an outcome, in mediation, the mediator listens to both parties; gathers the necessary information to identify some solutions; explores those with the parties and reality tests those options. If a proposal is forthcoming, it can be written up in a memorandum of understanding and can be then drawn up into a draft court order to be approved in writing by a judge. No court attendance is therefore necessary.

 

Mediation is by no means a soft option. To achieve financial outcomes, mediation still includes comprehensive financial disclosure of both parties’ assets liabilities, income and outgoings. There is however scope to simplify, or tailor make the disclosure process to enable parties to understand “what” there is before moving into working out “how” it can be fairly divided. 

Read the full article in IFA Magazine here.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • AIM at 30: a legacy of growth, a future of opportunity

    Paul Arathoon

    Quick Reads

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms / internationally mobile individuals

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes two new Dispute Resolution Partners in Singapore

    Stewart Hey

    News

  • Avoiding a sticky wicket

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • New homes - 1.5m Target

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

  • Hanh Nguyen, Hannah Edwards and Francesca Heath-Clarke contribute to the Legal Q&A section of R3 RECOVERY Magazine

    Hanh Nguyen

    In the Press

  • International Adviser quotes Dominic Lawrance on speculation that the UK is considering softening IHT rules on non-doms’ global assets

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • Caroline Greenwell recognised in GIR’s ‘Women in Investigations 2025’ list

    Caroline Greenwell

    News

  • FCA Supercharged Sandbox, Encouraging AI Experimentation With NVIDIA

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

  • Navigating supply chain disputes and risk

    Melanie Tomlin

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the majority sellers of Portas Consulting on the sale of the company to a division of Creative Artists Agency

    Keir Gordon

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ ‘Russell Up’ initiative wins at The Lawyer Awards 2025

    Joe Cohen

    In the Press

  • When Artificial 'Intelligence' invents Artificial Cases - how to navigate AI use in civil law proceedings?

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Arbitration for family offices

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • Behind the Curtain: Enforcing Contracts as an Undisclosed Principal in English Law

    Gareth Mills

    Insights

  • Reforms to the UK tax treatment of carried interest

    Alice Wilne

    Insights

  • Retail Collection – Episode 4: Caffé Nero – lessons from a life in retail management

    Michael Powner

    Podcasts

  • Nuptial Agreements: Perspectives from England and Hong Kong

    Sarah Higgins

    Insights

  • Beyond Gateway 2

    Mark Barley

    Insights

Back to top