• insights-banner

    In the Press

Henry Cuthbert writes for Law in Sport on Usain Bolt's move to trademark his legendary victory celebration

All of us who watched the 2008 Beijing Olympics will remember a few standout snapshots of Usain Bolt’s 100m final: a cheeky turn to see the abyss opening up between him and his fellow finalists; his outstretched arms and slap to the chest before crossing the finish line; the 9.69s on the speed-o-meter; and, of course, his famous victory celebration pose (often referenced as the “Lightning Bolt”). Whilst most people will have the image of this celebratory pose etched in their minds, the following description should help to jog (/sprint) anyone’s memory:

“The silhouette of a man in a distinctive pose, with one arm bent and pointing to the head, and the other arm raised and pointing upward.”

Whilst this is not quite poetry, it is in fact the “Description of Mark” attached to Bolt’s application to register his famous celebration pose with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The application was filed on 17 August 2022 under the legal basis of “intent to use” (section 1(b) Trademark Act 1946 (TA)), commonly referred to as the Lanham Act, and ownership of foreign registrations, namely his Jamaican registrations for the mark (section 44(e) TA). This is not the first time that he has filed for protection in the US, with his first filing made almost 12 years ago (which has since lapsed under US law as Bolt could not show that he had, in a trademark sense, actually used the mark). The UK’s Intellectual Property Office (IPO) approved Bolt’s application back in 2009 and it remains on the register.

His recent attempt to re-register the trademark in the US begs the question: why is Bolt so keen to trademark this image?

In an article for Law in Sport, Henry Cuthbert, Associate explores the answers, looking at:

  • What does Bolt intend to use his stylised mark for?
  • Why would Bolt want the mark registered?
  • Considerations of distinctiveness when registering a celebration as a trademark (UK vs. USA)
  • Have other athletes trademarked their celebrations?
  • Practical tips for athletes

Read the full article here (subscription required).

Our thinking

  • Alumni Drinks Reception

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Prima Facie

    Events

  • Can Labour deliver 1.5m new homes?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Setting Standards: The Ciarb Guideline on AI Use in Arbitration

    Dalal Alhouti

    Insights

  • Risky Business: Lessons in clearing up Contractual Confusion in John Sisk and Son Ltd v Capital & Centric (Rose) Ltd

    Murron McKeiver

    Insights

  • TCC decision on validity of payment and payless notices served simultaneously

    Johnathon Grasso

    Insights

  • Investors' Chronicle quotes Natalie Butler on how to pass on your digital assets

    Natalie Butler

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in LOVE CORN

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Startups Magazine quotes Daniel Rosenberg on the use of AI and technology in M&A

    Daniel Rosenberg

    In the Press

  • Relocation to Portugal: The Portuguese Tax Incentive Regime for Scientific Research and Innovation (NHR 2.0)

    Julia Mauricio

    Quick Reads

  • Estates Gazette quotes Lynsey Inglis on trends in life sciences real estate investment

    Lynsey Inglis

    In the Press

  • Global Insight quotes Shirley Fu, Tom Wong and Victoria Younghusband on trends in corporate activity in China

    Shirley Fu

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: “It’s the economy, stupid”

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Hugh Gunson and Cora Hardy write for Tax Journal on the recent changes to the loans to participators regime under FA 2025

    Hugh Gunson

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys successfully defends Super Fast Trading Limited against Bank of Ireland's summary judgment application

    Caroline Greenwell

    News

  • Katie Bewick and Mike Barrington write for Solicitors Journal on how the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 is reshaping UK business practices with new transparency rules

    Katie Bewick

    In the Press

  • PRC amends its AML Law to regulate specific non-financial institutions

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

  • The Evolution of Family Office Structures in Hong Kong: A Strategic Guide to Regulatory and Structuring Considerations. Part 2: Structuring Considerations

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • Retail Collection - Episode 3: BDO - Driving Value in an Evolving Market

    James Broadhurst

    Podcasts

  • Bloomberg quotes Piers Master on the suitability of the three-year facility policy designed to attract former UK non-doms

    Piers Master

    In the Press

Back to top