• insights-banner

    In the Press

FT Wealth quotes Sarah Anticoni on how forum shopping can be challenged in the English court

Sarah Anticoni is quoted in a FT Wealth feature on no-fault divorce laws and how forum shopping can be challenged in the English court. 

Sarah shares the below insights:

"While there may have been a few couples who held off pressing the button on their divorce until 6th April, there’s been no unmanageable surge in petitions. We don’t anticipate that there will be a significant number of couples coming from abroad who are choosing to divorce in London.

London is heralded as the ‘divorce capital of the world’ due to it being seen as generous in financial provision, especially to weaker financial parties, which are often women. This has led to many choosing to forum shop and see if they can litigate in England, to take advantage these favourable conditions.

For example, in England, pre-marital co-habitation that runs seamlessly into a marriage adds to the length of marriage, so claims for property, capital and pensions can seem much higher than in other countries. However, while spousal maintenance is still available in England, it is becoming much rarer to obtain an order for lifetime spousal support. This reflects the fact that many more women are working than before or could work in future. The breadth of financial claims are more important to international couples than no-fault divorce, in attracting them to litigate in the UK.

Aside from the UK, some states in the US are also generous upon divorce. There does not seem to be a feeling that other countries are concerned about England’s divorce laws and many spouses who divorce abroad can come to England for further provision.

More widely, forum shopping happens across the globe and not just for divorce. It’s important to bear in mind that when somebody tries to divorce in England, if the other party sees it as a deliberate attempt to obtain more money, they can challenge it in the English court. The court then has to decide which is the most convenient place to litigate."

Her quote as featured FT Wealth is below:

"It’s important to bear in mind that when somebody tries to divorce in England, if the other party sees it as a deliberate attempt to obtain more money, then they can challenge it in the English court.”

To read the full article click here (subscription required). 

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • What Issue: Surrogacy and the Longleat family trusts

    Oliver Auld

    Insights

  • eprivateclient quotes Oliver Little on how tax clarity can help the UK regain confidence among global wealth holders

    Oliver Little

    In the Press

  • Mary Perham and Tristan Tydings write for IFA Magazine on business property relief changes

    Mary Perham

    In the Press

  • The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is amended: what is the EUDR and what must companies do now?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Post Omnibus amendments, a practical overview of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) for businesses

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Lump sum tax regime: higher annual flat tax and grandfathering provision

    Nicola Saccardo

    Quick Reads

  • 2025: Year in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Quick Reads

  • Contracting for Effective Human Rights Due Diligence Takeaways

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Family Investment Companies Explained: How Control Shapes Succession Planning

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Maria Cristiana Felisi writes for WeWealth on international couples and Italian matrimonial property regimes

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

  • Hubbis features Jeffrey Lee on the rise of the multi‑hub family office landscape

    Jeffrey Lee

    In the Press

  • Nuisance claims: A recent decision highlights the key role of expert evidence

    Matt Cordwent

    Insights

  • Clarity on Practice Direction No.1 of 2025 in employment law proceedings

    Nick Hurley

    Quick Reads

  • Q&A: Signs and rights of way

    Oliver Park

    Insights

  • QICCA Conciliation Rules 2026 - scope, confidentiality and process at a glance

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Conway v Conway: Proprietary Estoppel, Family Promises and the Limits of Informality

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Joe Edwards and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on changes to possession actions

    Joe Edwards

    In the Press

  • New statutory guidance on the Modern Slavery Act 2015 for supply chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

Back to top