• news-banner

    Expert Insights

A new option for varying planning permissions

min read

Over the last couple of years, there has been an influx of case law regarding the scope of section 73 applications. In light of this, the Levelling up and Regeneration Act 2023 (LURA) provides an alternate route to vary a planning permission.

Background

Currently, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA) permits two methods of varying a planning permission:

  • non-material amendments under section 96A TCPA; and
  • variations to conditions under section 73 TCPA which (unlike a section 96A) result in a fresh planning permission. A developer may then choose to implement the original permission or the new section 73 permission.

It is well established in case law that a section 73 application cannot be used to vary the description of development or a condition which would then be inconsistent with the operative part of the planning permission (Finney [1]).

This position is now reflected in national Planning Practice Guidance which states that there ‘is no statutory limit on the degree of change permissible to conditions under s73, but the change must only relate to conditions and not to the operative part of the permission’.

Levelling up and Regeneration Act 2023 (LURA)

The LURA has introduced a third option for varying planning permissions. Section 73B allows for changes provided that they will not be ‘substantially different’ from the existing permission.

For this purpose, the existing permission will be the original permission granted rather than any subsequent section 73 permissions.

Section 73B reflects some of the statutory restrictions found in section 73 – i.e. it can’t be used to vary the time by which development must commence or the time by which an application for approval of reserved matters must be made.

Section 73B(7) limits an authority to reviewing those aspects that would differ from the existing permission – in this way section 73B is an attempt to get around the issues of Finney by allowing an authority to consider both the conditions and the description of development. However, section 73B may not help in all circumstances as it will only apply where the effect of the changes are the “same or substantially the same” as the original permission.

Section 73B is not yet in force and further secondary legislation will be required. We expect the effect and scope of the new section 73B to be vigorously tested in the planning courts.


[1] Finney v Welsh Ministers & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1868

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Next Gen Drinks Reception

    Events

    min read
  • General boundaries rule succeeds in boundary dispute between neighbours

    Emma Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • How do the King’s Speech Bills Answer the New Energy Reality?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • ‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ Research & Information Services Team wins BIALL Lexis Nexis Award for Excellence 2026

    Jas Breslin

    News

    min read
  • ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’…But It Might Lose You Money: Conduct in the No-Fault Divorce Era

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Darren Bailey comments in City AM about mandatory release clauses and the future of football transfers

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • US – UK Energy Collaboration

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the shareholders of Pooky Lighting on its acquisition by leading US lighting company Visual Comfort & Co.

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • Welfare always prevails? The implications of A & B v C & D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam) for UK domestic and overseas surrogacy

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • Spear's features William Longrigg's views on potential reforms to the UK family court and the reintroduction of Calderbank offers

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • 5 things English companies and their investors need to know about human rights-related litigation risks

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
Back to top