• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Q&A: If an assured tenant signs a new tenancy agreement, does it remain an assured tenancy or become an assured shorthold tenancy?

min read

Section 19A of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988) provides that an assured tenancy entered into after the day section 96 of the Housing Act 1996 came into force (28 February 1997) is automatically an assured shorthold tenancy. For this reason the vast majority of new tenancies entered into in England are assured shorthold tenancies. HA 1988, s 19A is however subject to the exceptions in HA 1988, Sch 2A.

HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(1), provides that an exemption to the automatic application of assured shorthold tenancies is where an assured tenancy is granted to someone who immediately before the grant of the tenancy held an assured tenancy, either alone or jointly with others. This is subject to the requirement that the landlord remains the same, though again in cases where there are joint landlords it is sufficient that only one of the landlords was the landlord under the old tenancy.

This means that a tenant renewing their tenancy of the same premises with the same landlord will not be required to take a tenancy with weaker security of tenure provisions (HA 1988, s 21 does not apply to assured tenancies) as a result of HA 1988, s 19A. If a joint tenant moves out, then the remaining tenant will not lose their right to an assured tenancy.

The other requirement for the exemption set out in HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(1) to apply is that no notice is served pursuant to HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(2). This notice must be served before the assured tenancy is to be entered into, must be served by the tenant(s) on the landlord(s) (if there are joint landlords, service on one is sufficient) and state that the tenant(s) wants the new tenancy to be an assured shorthold tenancy.

If no notice is served, then provided that the tenancy is of the same premises as the previous assured tenancy and at least one of the tenants and the landlords are the same, then the tenancy will not be an assured shorthold tenancy. It is important to note the requirement that the tenant must have held an assured tenancy ‘immediately’ before the grant of the new tenancy. A short delay may be enough to mean that the exemption is not applicable.

For further guidance, see Practice Note: Assured and assured shorthold tenancies—granting, in particular section 'Exceptions to AST status'.

This content was written by Oliver Park at Charles Russell Speechlys and was first published on the Lexis Nexis Ask Forum on 13 August 2020. For more information, please contact Oliver or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • 9fin quotes Jamie Rhodes and Tom Smitham on the growing role of private capital in football finance

    Jamie Rhodes

    In the Press

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Who Is Affected?

    Kerry Stares

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The National Security and Investment Act, Five Years On: What the 2025-26 Annual Report Tells Foreign Buyers

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Three Things You Need to Know

    Kerry Stares

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Jersey Trade Mark Reform: What the New Regime Means for You

    Dewdney William Drew

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Telegraph quotes Julia Cox on the growing use of Family Investment Companies for inheritance planning

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

    min read
  • Tessa Bartley comments in Legal Futures about our framework for choosing the right legal AI tools

    Tessa Bartley

    In the Press

    min read
  • Investors’ Chronicle quotes Katie Talbot on the risks and responsibilities of undertaking a trustee position

    Katie Talbot

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in Employee Benefits on minimum wage enforcement changes

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Retail Collection: Reputation management for brand founders

    Claudine Morgan

    Podcasts

  • Charlie Ring and Mike Barrington write for Professional Adviser on how best to prepare for the sale of a financial services business

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Beware the “late invoice” clause: TCC confirms the final date for payment must be fixed to the due date

    William Turner

    Insights

    min read
  • Fraudsters in the Inbox: The Limits of Contractual Causation in Logix Aero v Siam Aero

    Natalya Stone

    Insights

    min read
  • Light Bites, expert nuggets for the seasoned developer: bonus episode

    James Souter

    Podcasts

  • Mace Construct Ltd v Baltic Investment Holdings Ltd: A case highlighting the risk of including tender clarifications and schedules of derogations in building contracts

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

    min read
  • Child Maintenance: Reform, a Key Appeal, and the Elusive Christmas Order

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • High Court interprets repair covenant in Hotel lease and statutory fire safety obligations

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
  • Be Careful What You Wish For: In the UAE, How a Tenant’s Force Majeure Claim Can Dissolve Its Own Lease

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
Back to top