• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Q&A: If an assured tenant signs a new tenancy agreement, does it remain an assured tenancy or become an assured shorthold tenancy?

Section 19A of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988) provides that an assured tenancy entered into after the day section 96 of the Housing Act 1996 came into force (28 February 1997) is automatically an assured shorthold tenancy. For this reason the vast majority of new tenancies entered into in England are assured shorthold tenancies. HA 1988, s 19A is however subject to the exceptions in HA 1988, Sch 2A.

HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(1), provides that an exemption to the automatic application of assured shorthold tenancies is where an assured tenancy is granted to someone who immediately before the grant of the tenancy held an assured tenancy, either alone or jointly with others. This is subject to the requirement that the landlord remains the same, though again in cases where there are joint landlords it is sufficient that only one of the landlords was the landlord under the old tenancy.

This means that a tenant renewing their tenancy of the same premises with the same landlord will not be required to take a tenancy with weaker security of tenure provisions (HA 1988, s 21 does not apply to assured tenancies) as a result of HA 1988, s 19A. If a joint tenant moves out, then the remaining tenant will not lose their right to an assured tenancy.

The other requirement for the exemption set out in HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(1) to apply is that no notice is served pursuant to HA 1988, Sch 2A, para 7(2). This notice must be served before the assured tenancy is to be entered into, must be served by the tenant(s) on the landlord(s) (if there are joint landlords, service on one is sufficient) and state that the tenant(s) wants the new tenancy to be an assured shorthold tenancy.

If no notice is served, then provided that the tenancy is of the same premises as the previous assured tenancy and at least one of the tenants and the landlords are the same, then the tenancy will not be an assured shorthold tenancy. It is important to note the requirement that the tenant must have held an assured tenancy ‘immediately’ before the grant of the new tenancy. A short delay may be enough to mean that the exemption is not applicable.

For further guidance, see Practice Note: Assured and assured shorthold tenancies—granting, in particular section 'Exceptions to AST status'.

This content was written by Oliver Park at Charles Russell Speechlys and was first published on the Lexis Nexis Ask Forum on 13 August 2020. For more information, please contact Oliver or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Nuisance claims: A recent decision highlights the key role of expert evidence

    Matt Cordwent

    Insights

  • Clarity on Practice Direction No.1 of 2025 in employment law proceedings

    Nick Hurley

    Quick Reads

  • Q&A: Signs and rights of way

    Oliver Park

    Insights

  • Conway v Conway: Proprietary Estoppel, Family Promises and the Limits of Informality

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Joe Edwards and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on changes to possession actions

    Joe Edwards

    In the Press

  • New statutory guidance on the Modern Slavery Act 2015 for supply chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The UK Supreme Court to consider whether adoption orders can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Extension of Schedule A1 Inheritance Tax “look‑through” to UK agricultural property

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Freezing Orders: how are they enforced around the world? England and Wales perspective

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Miranda Fisher on the rise in arbitration for divorces in England and Wales

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Saudi Arabia’s 2025 Expropriation Law: What Has Changed?

    Ahmad Anani

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies: family values, succession and wealth stewardship

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Through the looking glass - transparency in the family courts (reprised).

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Marcus Yorke-Long comments in Spears on the mediation of family wealth disputes

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • The NPPF and an update on viability

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • The Results are in: AI on the Front Line of Alcohol Advertising Regulation

    Evie O'Connor

    Quick Reads

  • Technology Sector Lookahead 2026

    Mark Bailey

    Insights

  • Food & Beverage Lookahead 2026

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

Back to top