• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Court of Appeal decision on right to rent scheme

The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in the decision of The Secretary of State for the Home Department v. The Queen on the Application of the Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants [2020] EWCA Civ 542 in relation to right to rent checks that a landlord is required to undertake prior to the commencement of a new tenancy. 

Residential landlords in England are required to undertake right to rent checks to ensure that the proposed occupants have a “right to rent”. The proposed occupants must therefore provide satisfactory evidence that they are British Citizens or have leave to enter or remain in the UK. 

A challenge was brought in the High Court by the Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants that the right to rent checks were a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”).

The High Court held that the right to rent scheme was incompatible with Article 14 (enjoyment of ECHR rights without discrimination) of the ECHR when read in conjunction with Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and a decision to commence the scheme in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland would likely be a breach of Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 due to the potential for discrimination.  However, the Government appealed on 6 grounds.

Despite finding that the scheme did, to an extent, increase the risk of discrimination, the Court of Appeal allowed the Government’s appeal and dismissed the Joint Council’s cross-appeal with Lord Justice Hickinbottom stating “with respect to the contrary conclusion of the judge, considering all those factors (including the discrimination to which it gives rise), whether seen in terms of the manifestly without reasonable foundation criterion or on a simple proportionality balancing exercise, I consider the Scheme to be a proportionate means of achieving its legitimate objective and thus justified.”

The decision confirms that the scheme is proportionate and justified and, as such, landlords must continue to comply with the requirements of the scheme when letting residential properties within the private sector. 

It is also worth highlighting that in light of the Coronavirus outbreak, the Government has made temporary adjustments to the way in which landlords carry out right to rent checks. A tenant may send a landlord scanned copies or photographs of their passport or other documents confirming their immigration status and the landlord may now ask to see the original during a video call to verify it against the digital documents. When the temporary adjustments are withdrawn, a landlord will be required to carry out the usual pre-COVID-19 checks retrospectively on tenants who started their tenancy during this period.  If a tenant is found not to have had the right to rent, a landlord must take steps to end the tenancy and a landlord must comply with its reporting obligations to the Home Office. Further information as to the adjusted requirements can be found here in the Government’s guidance note.


This article was written by Tanya Pinto at Charles Russell Speechlys. For more information, please contact Tanya on +44 (0)1483 252575 or at tanya.pinto@crsblaw.com.

This article is not a substitute for legal advice on the specific circumstances of your chase.

Our thinking

  • CTBUH Annual Conference: Mastering ESG Challenges and the Launch of the Global In-House Counsel Assembly

    Kerry Stares

    Events

  • IBA Annual Conference 2024

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • International Arbitration Conference 2024 conference

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Removing A Trustee From a Trust

    Lydia Kember

    Insights

  • Benoît Pasquier and Alex Needham write for City AM on ensuring a more equitable future at the Olympic Games

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Oasis and the Often Overlooked Benefit of Dynamic Pricing

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Q&A: What evidence can establish boundaries?

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • Estates Gazette, New Civil Engineer and BE News quote David Savage on the Grenfell Phase 2 Inquiry report

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes James Souter on a legal case relating to Annington Properties and the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • Thomas Moran and Ruth Morris write for Prime Resi on the future of London's prime property market

    Thomas Moran

    In the Press

  • Budgeting for change: what should Landed Estates be doing before the Budget?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • FCA Consultations on prospectus regime

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • The Telegraph quotes Dominic Lawrance on anticipated tax changes and the impact on non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • “I object!” The use of non-objection clauses and confidentiality provisions in the context of Development Consent Order applications

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • The Effect of Contractor Insolvency on Construction Projects

    Mazin Al Mardhi

    Insights

  • Darren Bailey writes for City AM on the NFL’s decision to allow private equity investment

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

  • Relocation to Italy: Italian Lump Sum Tax Regime

    Nicola Saccardo

    Insights

  • App Fraud - where are we now?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Former F1 boss claims HSBC mis-sold ‘low-risk’ bond linked to high-risk property markets

    Joe Edwards

    Insights

Back to top