• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Court of Appeal decision on right to rent scheme

The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in the decision of The Secretary of State for the Home Department v. The Queen on the Application of the Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants [2020] EWCA Civ 542 in relation to right to rent checks that a landlord is required to undertake prior to the commencement of a new tenancy. 

Residential landlords in England are required to undertake right to rent checks to ensure that the proposed occupants have a “right to rent”. The proposed occupants must therefore provide satisfactory evidence that they are British Citizens or have leave to enter or remain in the UK. 

A challenge was brought in the High Court by the Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants that the right to rent checks were a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”).

The High Court held that the right to rent scheme was incompatible with Article 14 (enjoyment of ECHR rights without discrimination) of the ECHR when read in conjunction with Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and a decision to commence the scheme in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland would likely be a breach of Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 due to the potential for discrimination.  However, the Government appealed on 6 grounds.

Despite finding that the scheme did, to an extent, increase the risk of discrimination, the Court of Appeal allowed the Government’s appeal and dismissed the Joint Council’s cross-appeal with Lord Justice Hickinbottom stating “with respect to the contrary conclusion of the judge, considering all those factors (including the discrimination to which it gives rise), whether seen in terms of the manifestly without reasonable foundation criterion or on a simple proportionality balancing exercise, I consider the Scheme to be a proportionate means of achieving its legitimate objective and thus justified.”

The decision confirms that the scheme is proportionate and justified and, as such, landlords must continue to comply with the requirements of the scheme when letting residential properties within the private sector. 

It is also worth highlighting that in light of the Coronavirus outbreak, the Government has made temporary adjustments to the way in which landlords carry out right to rent checks. A tenant may send a landlord scanned copies or photographs of their passport or other documents confirming their immigration status and the landlord may now ask to see the original during a video call to verify it against the digital documents. When the temporary adjustments are withdrawn, a landlord will be required to carry out the usual pre-COVID-19 checks retrospectively on tenants who started their tenancy during this period.  If a tenant is found not to have had the right to rent, a landlord must take steps to end the tenancy and a landlord must comply with its reporting obligations to the Home Office. Further information as to the adjusted requirements can be found here in the Government’s guidance note.


This article was written by Tanya Pinto at Charles Russell Speechlys. For more information, please contact Tanya on +44 (0)1483 252575 or at tanya.pinto@crsblaw.com.

This article is not a substitute for legal advice on the specific circumstances of your chase.

Our thinking

  • Women in Leadership: Planning for the future

    Sarah Wigington

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Legal operations at work - how to do more with less

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • The Financial Times quotes Sophie Dworetzsky on potential drawbacks of changing or scrapping UK non-dom rules

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • Take-aways for UK firms from ESMA’s consultation on reverse solicitation

    Cheryl Tham

    Insights

  • Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill: Where are we now?

    Laura Bushaway

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Dominic Lawrance on the potential scrapping of non-dom rules in the Spring Budget

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Grocer quotes Kelvin Tanner on the impact of upcoming visa changes on the hospitality industry

    Kelvin Tanner

    In the Press

  • The Daily Telegraph quotes Nick Hurley on the legalities of asking for childcare employment in lieu of rent

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • FCA Authorisation: Do I need to be FCA-regulated?

    Richard Ellis

    Insights

  • Post-sale planning: The Maximisation and Protection of Private Wealth following a Business Sale or Exit Event

    Tabitha Collett

    Insights

  • City AM quotes William Garner on FCA plans to 'name and shame' firms under investigation

    William Garner

    In the Press

  • Supreme Court confirms injunctions can be granted against newcomers

    Harriet Durn

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys ‘Client Conversations’ welcomes one of the best strikers of all time and greatest players in Premier League history, Alan Shearer CBE

    Simon Ridpath

    News

  • Edward Robinson and Charlie Searle write for FT Adviser on key considerations when an individual inherits company shares

    Edward Robinson

    In the Press

  • Hugh Gunson and Karin Mouhon write for Tax Journal on a recent Upper Tribunal decision - HMRC v The Taxpayer

    Hugh Gunson

    In the Press

  • Pregnancy and maternity discrimination in the workplace

    Michael Powner

    Insights

  • Client Conversations Podcast: Alan Shearer CBE

    Simon Ridpath

    Podcasts

  • Sifted quotes Victoria Younghusband on a boardroom disagreement involving Klarna and Sequoia Capital

    Victoria Younghusband

    In the Press

  • The Telegraph quotes Rose Carey on new visa salary rules

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Trade Credit Insurance – Protection, Economic Instability and Increased Demand

    Mary Barrett

    Insights

Back to top