• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Coronavirus Act 2020 - Implications for Residential Tenancies

min read

Since the outbreak of Coronavirus in England and Wales, the Government has introduced a series of measures which have an impacted on many areas including residential tenancies. 

The Coronavirus Act 2020 (“the Act”) came into force on 25 March 2020 and has placed restrictions on termination of residential tenancies. 

Following amendments to The Coronavirus Act 2020, the restrictions detailed below have changed for notices served on or after 29 August 2020. 

Assured Shorthold Tenancies

Prior to the Act, a landlord could serve a Notice pursuant to Section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 (as amended) on a tenant to seek to bring a tenancy to end. These Notices are often referred to as “no fault” Notices. Under a Section 21 Notice a landlord was required to give at least two months’ notice to a tenant to vacate. The Act has extended this notice period to three months for any notices served between 26 March and 30 September 2020. 

Assured Tenancies

Under Section 8 of the Housing Act 1988 (as amended), a landlord may serve notice on a tenant of an assured or assured shorthold tenancy if the landlord can establish one of the statutory grounds such as arrears of rent.

The Act extends the notice periods that a landlord must provide to its tenants in a Section 8 Notice to three months. This is the case for each and every notice period contained within Section 8 which is currently for a period of less than three months. 

The Act does not therefore prevent a landlord from serving a Section 8 Notice on its tenants if there is a breach of the tenancy agreement, it simply extends the date at which they could issue possession proceedings and applies to any notices served between 26 March 2020 and 30 September 2020.

Power to Alter Three Month Notice Periods

There is a power under Schedule 29 of the Act for the three month period to be extended for a period up to six months. 

Possession Proceedings

From 27 March 2020, the Courts are no longer issuing possession proceedings for a period of three months (and this period may be extended). Existing possession matters are suspended and County Court bailiffs have ceased the enforcement of possession orders for the time being. 

Summary

The Act does not prevent a landlord from serving a Section 8 or Section 21 Notice.  However, the notice period contained within the Notice must be extended to give at least three months’ notice under the Act. 

Payment of rent will be the cause of most concern for landlords and tenants during the next few months and there will no doubt be discussions between landlords and tenants in respect of individual tenancies.


This article was written by Tanya Pinto. For more information, please contact Tanya on +44 (0)1483 252575 or at tanya.pinto@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath features in the latest episode of the Non-Billable podcast

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

    min read
  • Private equity (PE): How Founders and Management Teams can protect themselves - it’s a marriage of convenience so make sure your pre-nup is watertight…

    Nadim Meer

    Insights

    min read
  • From Pilot to Nationwide Protection: New Powers to Protect Victims of Domestic Abuse

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • Qatar’s New Preliminary Registration Framework: A Transformative Step for the Off-Plan Market

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top