• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The statutory residence test

Residence is a hugely important concept for the taxation of individuals, as it has a profound effect on whether, and to what extent, they are subject to tax. This note summarises the complex rules which apply to determine residence for UK tax purposes.

Background

Prior to 6 April 2013, the rules for determining whether an individual was resident in the UK for tax purposes were largely based on cases decided around a hundred years ago. These cases had become hard to apply in practice, particularly given increases in international mobility. It was therefore difficult in some situations for an advisor to give a conclusive view on whether a client was, or was likely to become or remain, UK resident.

In response to this problem, the UK government introduced a statutory residence test (the SRT), which has been in force since 6 April 2013.  The SRT is in some respects an improvement on the old rules, since it can be used to determine with much greater certainty when an individual will be regarded as UK resident.  In particular, it avoids ambiguities under the old rules about what a UK resident individual needs to do, in terms of spending less time in the UK and/or severing links to the UK, to become non-UK resident. However, aspects of the SRT are hugely complicated, and the tests can be very difficult to apply in practice.

Structure of the SRT

The SRT determines residence status on a tax year by tax year basis.  UK tax years run from 6 April one calendar year to 5 April the next. Under the SRT, an individual may be:

  • conclusively non-UK resident, if certain conditions are met; or
  • conclusively UK resident, if certain other conditions are met.

If the individual does not meet the conditions to be treated as conclusively resident or non-resident, his/her status is determined by the so-called ‘sufficient ties’ test.  This takes into account whether the individual has been UK resident in previous tax years, the number of days he/she has spent in the UK in the relevant tax year, and the number of ‘ties’ to the UK that he/she has in the relevant tax year.

The residence tests: a simplified summary

1. The test for 'conclusive' Non-UK Residential Status 
Resident in any of the three preceding tax years? The individual is non-UK resident if…
No Fewer than 46 days in the UK
Yes Fewer than 16 days in the UK

Full-time work outside the UK

The individual is non-UK resident if in the tax year all of the following conditions are met:

  • he/she works ‘sufficient hours’ outside the UK (35 hours or more a week on average);
  • there are no significant periods (of 31 consecutive days or more) in which he/she spends less than three hours working outside the UK (or in which does not do any work outside the UK);
  • there are no more than 30 days on which he/she does more than three hours’ work in the UK; and

his/her days in the UK (whether working or otherwise) do not exceed 90.

If none of the above conditions are met, then go on to…

 

2. The tests for ‘conclusive’ UK Resident Status
The individual is UK resident if spends 183 days or more in the UK

Sole/main home in the UK

The individual is UK resident if:

  • he/she has a home in the UK in all or part of the tax year;
  • he/she is present at that home on at least 30 days in the tax year (not necessarily at midnight); and
  • there is a period of 91 consecutive days (at least 30 days of which are in the relevant tax year) in which either: 

(a) the individual has no home outside the UK; or 

(b) he/she does have a home outside the UK, but in the relevant tax year is present at the non-UK home on fewer than 30 days.

Full-time work in the UK

The individual is UK resident if, in a 365 day period which overlaps to some extent with the tax year:

  • he/she works ‘sufficient hours’ in the UK (35 hours or more a week on average); and
  • there are no significant periods (of 31 consecutive days or more) in which he/she spends less than three hours working in the UK (or in which he/she does not do any work in the UK).

If none of the above conditions are met, then go on to…

3. The ‘sufficient ties’ test for UK residence
Relevant ties:
  • Work tie: Applies if the individual works for more than three hours in the UK on 40 or more days in tax year (whether continuously or intermittently).
  • Family tie: Applies if the individual has a spouse/civil partner/cohabitee/minor child who is resident in the UK.
  • Accommodation tie: Applies if the individual has a place to live in the UK which is available for his/her use for a continuous 91 day period, and he/she spends at least one night there in the tax year.
  • 90 days tie: Applies if the individual spent more than 90 days in the UK in either or both of the previous two tax years.
  • Country tie (only applies to individuals who were UK resident in one or more of the preceding three tax years): Applies if the individual spends more days in the UK than in any other country, in the tax year.
Resident in any of the three previous tax years? Yes No
Number of days in the UK required for residence (or permitted if residence is to be avoided):
With 4 or more ties 16 (15) 46 (45)
With 3 ties 46 (45) 91 (90)
With 2 ties 91 (90) 121 (120)
With 1 tie 121 (120) 183 (182)

 

Key terms
Day Generally, this means any day on which the individual is physically present in the UK at midnight. In general, days on which the individual is present in the UK are not counted if the individual is not present in the UK at midnight. However, there is an anti-avoidance rule which applies in certain circumstances, in which case a day on which an individual is physically present in the UK at any point, even if not at midnight, will be counted.
Home This means a dwelling used with a sufficient degree of permanence to be regarded as a home, which can include a property occupied under a short-term tenancy. A home can be a property owned by some other person, e.g. one owned by a company or trust. The concept of a home differs from the concept of accommodation, which is even broader, and can include a hotel, if the same hotel is used for an extended period.

Our thinking

  • Alumni Drinks Reception

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Prima Facie

    Events

  • Token2049 week - what's on the horizon?

    Racheal Muldoon

    Quick Reads

  • My “15 Minutes of fame”, Eddie Redmayne and The Theory of Everything...

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • PISCES – HMRC release technical note on the interaction of PISCES on share schemes and incentives

    Tim Edgar

    Insights

  • Computing quotes Gareth Mills on a major antitrust case involving Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Michael O'Connor and Lauren Fraser write for Property Week on the impact of the Building Safety Act on residential property management

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Grégoire Uldry and Alexia Egger Castillo write for Wealth Briefing on relocation to Switzerland and trusts

    Grégoire Uldry

    In the Press

  • Martyn’s Law receives Royal Assent – what do property owners and occupiers need to do now?

    Ben Butterworth

    Quick Reads

  • From Double Helix to the Courtroom – A Look Down The Microscope into DNA Testing in Family Law

    James Elliott-Hughes

    Insights

  • The path to paradise or the road to ruin? The Pathfinder pilot in Children Act cases

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

  • Private wealth shuffle: Uncovering the latest relocation trends of fortunes

    Yacine Diallo

    Insights

  • Can Labour deliver 1.5m new homes?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Setting Standards: The Ciarb Guideline on AI Use in Arbitration

    Dalal Alhouti

    Insights

  • Risky Business: Lessons in clearing up Contractual Confusion in John Sisk and Son Ltd v Capital & Centric (Rose) Ltd

    Murron McKeiver

    Insights

  • TCC decision on validity of payment and payless notices served simultaneously

    Johnathon Grasso

    Insights

  • Investors' Chronicle quotes Natalie Butler on how to pass on your digital assets

    Natalie Butler

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in LOVE CORN

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Startups Magazine quotes Daniel Rosenberg on the use of AI and technology in M&A

    Daniel Rosenberg

    In the Press

  • Relocation to Portugal: The Portuguese Tax Incentive Regime for Scientific Research and Innovation (NHR 2.0)

    Julia Mauricio

    Quick Reads

Back to top