• news-banner

    Expert Insights

First time buyers relief and trusts

Last year some clients came to me with what appeared to be a fairly innocuous situation.

Alice and Belinda's mother had established a discretionary trust over a holiday home and had appointed her daughters (Alice and Belinda) as the trustees.

Belinda died a few years ago and her son, Cameron, had been appointed as a replacement trustee.

When Alice and Cameron instructed me, neither of them owned their home. They thought it might be time to sell the holiday home held by the trust, divide the proceeds and each purchase their first homes, each of which would cost around £500,000. It all sounded very sensible.

Would first time buyers relief (FTBR) apply to Alice's and Cameron's personal purchases? On policy grounds, it felt as if the answer should surely be yes - their ownership as trustees should have no bearing on their personal position - but unfortunately the statute was not so clear.  

Under the SDLT legislation, "where persons acquire a chargeable interest as trustees of a settlement, they are treated... as purchasers". This is a problem because, in order for FTBR to apply, an individual cannot have been a purchaser in respect of a previous land transaction. What made even less sense was that, on one reading, Alice might not be able to benefit from FTBR because she initially acquired the holiday home when the trust was established, but Cameron might benefit from FTBR because he happened to be appointed as a trustee later.  

I am therefore delighted that STEP has this week published its correspondence with HMRC on this point (which followed directly on from the case of Alice and Cameron) confirming the position. HMRC has confirmed that in the scenario above both Alice and Cameron could benefit from FTBR on their personal purchases.

The correspondence also highlights that careful legal advice is required because the position remains complex, particularly where the trustees involved are also beneficiaries under the trust. 

Another example is in order!

David and Evie are trustees of a settlement which owns a house which is rented out. The trust is held on interest in possession trusts for David and Evie and so they each receive 50% of the rental income. David has not bought his first home and would like to do so. Again we assume that he will buy a £500,000 property.

If David goes ahead and buys his first home, he won't be able to qualify for FTBR. This is because FTBR is precluded where the 3% supplemental surcharge on the purchase of a second home applies. David has never lived in the trust's rental property, nor has he owned his own home. He may therefore be very surprised to hear that HMRC treats the purchase of his "first" home as his second. This is because HMRC views David as the owner of the trust's rental property because of his interest in possession. David has to pay £27,500 in SDLT.

However, the position is very different if David and Evie (as trustees) decide to sell the trust's rental property before David buys his first home. David is no longer within the 3% supplemental surcharge because, at the time he makes his personal purchase, he is no longer treated as owning the trust's rental property (which has been sold). In addition, as confirmed by the HMRC correspondence, David is not precluded from first time buyers relief by virtue of the fact that as trustee he previously owned a property. FTBR now applies to David's purchase and he pays only £3,750 in SDLT. 

Let's hope David (and Evie) took advice prior to David's purchase!  

Fred and Georgina are the trustees of an interest in possession trust for their daughter, Harriet. Harriet is just starting university and would like to buy her first home to live in whilst attending her course. Fred and Georgina think that it would be sensible for it to be bought by the trust given Harriet's young age. Unfortunately, FTBR will not apply to this purchase - the requirement is that the purchasers (which, for the purposes of FTBR, means the trustees) must intend to occupy the property as their only or main residence. This isn't the case and so the asset protection benefits of purchasing the property in the trust will need to be weighed against the less preferential SDLT treatment.

These examples show that:

  • Very careful analysis is required which differentiates between someone's role as trustee and that of beneficiary. In addition, the nature of the beneficiary's interest is very important; if they have an interest in possession particular care is required.
  • The SDLT 3% surcharge and FTBR rules take different approaches to interest in possession trusts.  The 3% surcharge looks through and treats the life tenant as purchaser, whereas the FTBR rules look to the trustees.  
  • The SDLT legislation is very complex and the outcomes, where trusts are involved, can be unexpected.
  • Take advice and take it before you exchange on the prospective purchase!

HMRC has said it will now update its guidance to reflect the correspondence. 

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Fiona Edmond writes for The Law Society Gazette on taking maternity leave as a Deputy Senior Partner

    Fiona Edmond

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Annie Green write for Employee Benefits on the impact of dropping the real living wage pledge

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Planning and Life Sciences: the challenges and opportunities in the Golden Triangle

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • London’s Knowledge Clusters: From Emerging to Maturing – Start Ups on the Global Stage?

    Lynsey Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Britain's most successful female Olympian has retired at 31, but how does the Family Court treat (early) retirement?

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • How the abolition of Multiple Dwellings Relief affects Build to Rent

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • It’s not just a High Court decision, it’s a successful M&S High Court Decision

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • 'Saltburn': How the Catton family could have protected the Saltburn estate and could Oliver's inheritance still be contested? (Part 2)

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • 'Saltburn': How the Catton family could have protected the Saltburn estate and could Oliver's inheritance still be contested? (Part 1)

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Beware of not obtaining a court order when settling your finances

    Julia Mauricio

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: when can an enforcement notice against an unlawful use also require the removal of related structures?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Vulnerable elders : a harrowing story and the lessons which need to be learnt

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill: Will new consumer protection rules restrict access to Gift Aid?

    Quick Reads

  • Home buyers and sellers hit by cyber-attack

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • International Relocation: The Parent Trap 25 years on ...

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Statement provides little comfort for farmers and landowners

    Hannah Connors

    Quick Reads

  • Top Tips to Building your Brand - Women in Chancery

    Katelyn Silver

    Quick Reads

Back to top