• news-banner

    Expert Insights

First time buyers relief and trusts

Last year some clients came to me with what appeared to be a fairly innocuous situation.

Alice and Belinda's mother had established a discretionary trust over a holiday home and had appointed her daughters (Alice and Belinda) as the trustees.

Belinda died a few years ago and her son, Cameron, had been appointed as a replacement trustee.

When Alice and Cameron instructed me, neither of them owned their home. They thought it might be time to sell the holiday home held by the trust, divide the proceeds and each purchase their first homes, each of which would cost around £500,000. It all sounded very sensible.

Would first time buyers relief (FTBR) apply to Alice's and Cameron's personal purchases? On policy grounds, it felt as if the answer should surely be yes - their ownership as trustees should have no bearing on their personal position - but unfortunately the statute was not so clear.  

Under the SDLT legislation, "where persons acquire a chargeable interest as trustees of a settlement, they are treated... as purchasers". This is a problem because, in order for FTBR to apply, an individual cannot have been a purchaser in respect of a previous land transaction. What made even less sense was that, on one reading, Alice might not be able to benefit from FTBR because she initially acquired the holiday home when the trust was established, but Cameron might benefit from FTBR because he happened to be appointed as a trustee later.  

I am therefore delighted that STEP has this week published its correspondence with HMRC on this point (which followed directly on from the case of Alice and Cameron) confirming the position. HMRC has confirmed that in the scenario above both Alice and Cameron could benefit from FTBR on their personal purchases.

The correspondence also highlights that careful legal advice is required because the position remains complex, particularly where the trustees involved are also beneficiaries under the trust. 

Another example is in order!

David and Evie are trustees of a settlement which owns a house which is rented out. The trust is held on interest in possession trusts for David and Evie and so they each receive 50% of the rental income. David has not bought his first home and would like to do so. Again we assume that he will buy a £500,000 property.

If David goes ahead and buys his first home, he won't be able to qualify for FTBR. This is because FTBR is precluded where the 3% supplemental surcharge on the purchase of a second home applies. David has never lived in the trust's rental property, nor has he owned his own home. He may therefore be very surprised to hear that HMRC treats the purchase of his "first" home as his second. This is because HMRC views David as the owner of the trust's rental property because of his interest in possession. David has to pay £27,500 in SDLT.

However, the position is very different if David and Evie (as trustees) decide to sell the trust's rental property before David buys his first home. David is no longer within the 3% supplemental surcharge because, at the time he makes his personal purchase, he is no longer treated as owning the trust's rental property (which has been sold). In addition, as confirmed by the HMRC correspondence, David is not precluded from first time buyers relief by virtue of the fact that as trustee he previously owned a property. FTBR now applies to David's purchase and he pays only £3,750 in SDLT. 

Let's hope David (and Evie) took advice prior to David's purchase!  

Fred and Georgina are the trustees of an interest in possession trust for their daughter, Harriet. Harriet is just starting university and would like to buy her first home to live in whilst attending her course. Fred and Georgina think that it would be sensible for it to be bought by the trust given Harriet's young age. Unfortunately, FTBR will not apply to this purchase - the requirement is that the purchasers (which, for the purposes of FTBR, means the trustees) must intend to occupy the property as their only or main residence. This isn't the case and so the asset protection benefits of purchasing the property in the trust will need to be weighed against the less preferential SDLT treatment.

These examples show that:

  • Very careful analysis is required which differentiates between someone's role as trustee and that of beneficiary. In addition, the nature of the beneficiary's interest is very important; if they have an interest in possession particular care is required.
  • The SDLT 3% surcharge and FTBR rules take different approaches to interest in possession trusts.  The 3% surcharge looks through and treats the life tenant as purchaser, whereas the FTBR rules look to the trustees.  
  • The SDLT legislation is very complex and the outcomes, where trusts are involved, can be unexpected.
  • Take advice and take it before you exchange on the prospective purchase!

HMRC has said it will now update its guidance to reflect the correspondence. 

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2023

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • Calculating Social Value in BTR

    Francis Ho

    Events

  • Dangers of trusts

    Mark Summers

    Events

  • China Daily, and other titles, quote Silvia On on trends affecting Chinese HNWIs

    Silvia On

    In the Press

  • The Evening Standard quotes Rose Carey on the increase in visa fees

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • New Hong Kong crypto regime: trading platforms falling foul already?

    Patrick Chan

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard

    News

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer

    News

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Emma Humphreys on UK rental costs

    Emma Humphreys

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Vanessa Duff writes for Wealth Briefing on how the Bank of Mum and Dad can help young people get on the property ladder

    Vanessa Duff

    In the Press

  • Hamish Perry and Mike Barrington write for The Evening Standard on whether a merger between the CBI and Make UK can work

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • Silicon quotes Gareth Mills on the UK consumer lawsuit against Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes Louise Ward on the additional support required by aspiring UK life sciences operators

    Louise Ward

    In the Press

  • 5 top tips to make estate administration easier for your executor

    Jessica Dawkins

    Quick Reads

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Inside Britney and Sam’s $10m prenup

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • NSPCC urges Government to protect children from domestic abuse during holidays

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • A brief look at HMRC v A Taxpayer [2023] UKUT 00182 (TCC)

    Dominic Lawrance

    Quick Reads

  • ATED and the farmhouse

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Million Dollar Footballer With No Assets?

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • Are Parental Rights Equal for All Families?

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Atonement and post separation endeavour: wife keeps £1m gift from husband after his affair and will receive a share of his business’ future profits

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • Pensions: change is in the air once again

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Pre-Settled Status to be automatically extended by two years

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Don’t push it… Quincecare duty clarified

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Pandora Papers: HMRC nudge taxpayers to come out of their box

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Can a financial claim in divorce proceed after the death of either party?

    Sarah Higgins

    Quick Reads

Back to top