• news-banner

    Expert Insights

First time buyers relief and trusts

min read

Last year some clients came to me with what appeared to be a fairly innocuous situation.

Alice and Belinda's mother had established a discretionary trust over a holiday home and had appointed her daughters (Alice and Belinda) as the trustees.

Belinda died a few years ago and her son, Cameron, had been appointed as a replacement trustee.

When Alice and Cameron instructed me, neither of them owned their home. They thought it might be time to sell the holiday home held by the trust, divide the proceeds and each purchase their first homes, each of which would cost around £500,000. It all sounded very sensible.

Would first time buyers relief (FTBR) apply to Alice's and Cameron's personal purchases? On policy grounds, it felt as if the answer should surely be yes - their ownership as trustees should have no bearing on their personal position - but unfortunately the statute was not so clear.  

Under the SDLT legislation, "where persons acquire a chargeable interest as trustees of a settlement, they are treated... as purchasers". This is a problem because, in order for FTBR to apply, an individual cannot have been a purchaser in respect of a previous land transaction. What made even less sense was that, on one reading, Alice might not be able to benefit from FTBR because she initially acquired the holiday home when the trust was established, but Cameron might benefit from FTBR because he happened to be appointed as a trustee later.  

I am therefore delighted that STEP has this week published its correspondence with HMRC on this point (which followed directly on from the case of Alice and Cameron) confirming the position. HMRC has confirmed that in the scenario above both Alice and Cameron could benefit from FTBR on their personal purchases.

The correspondence also highlights that careful legal advice is required because the position remains complex, particularly where the trustees involved are also beneficiaries under the trust. 

Another example is in order!

David and Evie are trustees of a settlement which owns a house which is rented out. The trust is held on interest in possession trusts for David and Evie and so they each receive 50% of the rental income. David has not bought his first home and would like to do so. Again we assume that he will buy a £500,000 property.

If David goes ahead and buys his first home, he won't be able to qualify for FTBR. This is because FTBR is precluded where the 3% supplemental surcharge on the purchase of a second home applies. David has never lived in the trust's rental property, nor has he owned his own home. He may therefore be very surprised to hear that HMRC treats the purchase of his "first" home as his second. This is because HMRC views David as the owner of the trust's rental property because of his interest in possession. David has to pay £27,500 in SDLT.

However, the position is very different if David and Evie (as trustees) decide to sell the trust's rental property before David buys his first home. David is no longer within the 3% supplemental surcharge because, at the time he makes his personal purchase, he is no longer treated as owning the trust's rental property (which has been sold). In addition, as confirmed by the HMRC correspondence, David is not precluded from first time buyers relief by virtue of the fact that as trustee he previously owned a property. FTBR now applies to David's purchase and he pays only £3,750 in SDLT. 

Let's hope David (and Evie) took advice prior to David's purchase!  

Fred and Georgina are the trustees of an interest in possession trust for their daughter, Harriet. Harriet is just starting university and would like to buy her first home to live in whilst attending her course. Fred and Georgina think that it would be sensible for it to be bought by the trust given Harriet's young age. Unfortunately, FTBR will not apply to this purchase - the requirement is that the purchasers (which, for the purposes of FTBR, means the trustees) must intend to occupy the property as their only or main residence. This isn't the case and so the asset protection benefits of purchasing the property in the trust will need to be weighed against the less preferential SDLT treatment.

These examples show that:

  • Very careful analysis is required which differentiates between someone's role as trustee and that of beneficiary. In addition, the nature of the beneficiary's interest is very important; if they have an interest in possession particular care is required.
  • The SDLT 3% surcharge and FTBR rules take different approaches to interest in possession trusts.  The 3% surcharge looks through and treats the life tenant as purchaser, whereas the FTBR rules look to the trustees.  
  • The SDLT legislation is very complex and the outcomes, where trusts are involved, can be unexpected.
  • Take advice and take it before you exchange on the prospective purchase!

HMRC has said it will now update its guidance to reflect the correspondence. 

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi writes in We Wealth about the treatment of joint bank accounts on inheritance

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys celebrates US team recognition in Best Lawyers in America® 2027

    Karen Yates

    News

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • Diversification, safe havens and the pivot to Asia for US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top