• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Heritage property and conditional exemption: matters to consider when opening your house to the public for the first time

I recently inherited some chattels of national pre-eminence and am thinking about claiming conditional exemption in respect of the previous owner’s death. What should I expect?

What is conditional exemption?

Conditional exemption is a mechanism for deferring inheritance tax (IHT) and/or capital gains tax (CGT) on objects or collections of national, scientific, historic or artistic pre-eminence.  It can also be claimed in respect of outstanding landscapes and historic buildings.

Its origins lie in the policy desire to conserve national heritage for the benefit of the public.  In other words, it is designed to avoid the forced sale of items, or indeed historic houses, which might otherwise be triggered by the need to fund the tax due on them.

Why is it “conditional”?

It is “conditional” because the deferment only persists for so long as you adhere to the conditions of the regime.  In exchange for deferring the tax charge which would otherwise be due, you provide undertakings to:

  • provide public access (more on this below);
  • keep the items in the country (except for a purpose and a period approved by HMRC); and
  • take reasonable steps for their preservation.  It is notable that this is only preservation, not enhancement.

It is worth saying that conditional exemption is normally considered the tax planning of last resort because it only defers the tax.  If 100% reliefs, allowances or absolute exemptions are available, these will be preferable.

You say the tax is deferred – when could it become due?

For items which are conditionally exempt from IHT, the deferred tax will become due on:

  • A failure to observe the undertakings in a material respect.  This would also include the loss, theft or destruction of the items where reasonable steps have not been taken to ensure their preservation.
  • The death of the owner, unless the undertakings are renewed by their heirs.
  • A disposal (eg by gift) of the items, unless the undertakings are renewed by the recipient.
  • The sale of the items. 

What does “public access” actually mean?

Normally the undertakings will require public access to the chattels for 28 days a year, or comparable multiples over a two or three year period.  

Although the undertaking itself may be perfunctory on the matter of public access, HMRC guidance is quite detailed.  Normally, they would like the 28 days to include one day a week plus Bank Holidays during the spring and summer months.  Access should be for at least four hours a day, between 10am and 5pm.  

Public access can be provided by way of opening the house where the items are situated.  However, if the items are modest in number, or the house not particularly suitable for public access, HMRC will encourage satisfaction of the public access condition via loans to museums or galleries.

As part of the public access undertaking, you will also be expected to allow access by prior appointment on non-access days for research and study and there is normally a requirement to provide photographs to curators.

It should be noted that what constitutes reasonable public access is very fact-specific and so, although the above is a guide, it will pretend on the particular circumstances and the negotiations with HMRC on this matter.

Can I make pre-booking a requirement?

You can recommend it!  However, it is important that you still allow “walk ins”.   This is because, since 1998, access via “prior appointment only” no longer satisfies the public access undertaking.

Am I “locking” my successors into a burdensome regime?

If your successors wish to keep on deferring the tax, then they are indeed locked into the regime, including the public access requirements.  Each generation will need to undertake their own cost-benefit analysis as to whether this is a price which they consider worth paying.  Some families take the view that it is – particularly if the house is opened during the summer period when they may not be at home.  Others, who may have decided to open their house on a commercial basis, may not find it arduous at all.  

If at any point your successors want to come out of the regime, the deferred charge will become due and on the market value of the assets at that time.  If, for example, conditional exemption from IHT was obtained on a £1m painting in 1995, the relevant rate “on foot” will be 40%.  If, when the painting is taken out of the regime, the painting is worth £5m, £2m of IHT will become due.

How is the application made?

Normally the executors fill in a specific conditional exemption form (IHT420) as part of the IHT return for the estate, although often this is accompanied by side correspondence with HMRC’s Heritage Team.  

An expert in the area should be asked to prepare an inventory of the chattels (together with photographs) and an explanation of why they should be considered pre-eminent.  Usually, the inventory will flag any items which have previously been conditionally exempted.

You will need to put together a proposed visitors’ route (on a floorplan) which will allow visitors to see all the conditionally exempt chattels.  If it is impossible in respect of a particular item, then it may be possible to negotiate alternative arrangements with HMRC (such as viewing “on request” for that specific item) but this is increasingly rare.  Think about how intrusive the proposed route will be.  Is it possible to move the chattels into one or two rooms for the open days?

As mentioned, typically a letter is sent to HMRC’s Heritage Team enclosing the inventory and setting out:

  • where the items can be inspected;
  • how the owner proposes to preserve the items;
  • how the owner proposes to meet the public access requirement;
  • how the public access will be publicised; and
  • certain confirmations that the items are not going to be sold, offered in lieu (a subject for another time!) or removed from the country.

Once HMRC receives the request, it will ask Arts Council England to opine on the pre-eminence of the items.  Arts Council England are likely to wish to visit the items in order to provide their opinion.  They may also make some suggestions as to whether there could be improvements to how the items are exhibited eg if they are liable to sun damage due to their position.

The claim needs to be made within two years of death.  If the decision is made not to make a claim, IHT will be due on the item within six months of death and interest will accrue after that date.

What information needs to be made publicly available?

Details of the chattels, their location, access days and contact details will be published on HMRC’s website. Owners are also expected to publicise the arrangements on their website or in appropriate local guides.

Can I charge for opening the house?  I am concerned about covering the extra costs involved.

Yes, but this should not be seen as a means of producing a profit!  

Reference should also be made to comparable charges elsewhere; the charge should not so high as to dissuade public access.

HMRC’s guidance makes it clear that it is not acceptable for owners to seek to recoup the costs of preservation through an access charge.

It would be worth considering how the mandated public access days fit into your strategy for the house and Estate diversification plans more generally.  For example, it may be that your Estate wishes to offer special events or premium tours (eg with afternoon tea).  If this is a route which you are keen to explore, take advice on the best structure for this leisure business and the income tax and VAT implications.

What else have I forgotten?!

Do a health and safety assessment and consider the practicalities of opening your house.  Where is the parking?  Are there toilet facilities?  Is there disabled access?  Really importantly - have you got appropriate insurance in place?

It is also worth thinking about whether change of use or planning consent might be required from the Local Council.  This may be particularly important if there are going to be physical changes to the premises eg new entrances, parking, tea rooms or a separate “museum-style” annexe for the items.  

Our thinking

  • Business over Breakfast: Arbitration is cheaper – Myth or Reality?

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Fiona Edmond writes for The Law Society Gazette on taking maternity leave as a Deputy Senior Partner

    Fiona Edmond

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 Budget: how the proposed new tax rules will work for US-connected clients

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Annie Green write for Employee Benefits on the impact of dropping the real living wage pledge

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The UK’s March 2024 budget: Offshore trusts - have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    Insights

  • Playing with FYR: planning opportunities offered by the UK’s proposed four-year regime for newcomers to the UK

    Catrin Harrison

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on inheriting company shares

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Cara Imbrailo and Ilona Bateson write for Fashion Capital on pop-up shops

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Planning and Life Sciences: the challenges and opportunities in the Golden Triangle

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Personnel Today quotes Rose Carey on Italy’s new digital nomad visa

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Essential Intelligence – UAE Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • IFA Magazine quotes Julia Cox on the possibility of more tax cuts before the general election

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • ‘One plus one makes two': Court of Protection finds conflict of interest within law firm structure

    Katie Foulds

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Michael Powner writes for Raconteur on AI and automating back-office roles

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Arbitration: Getting value for your money

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Portfolio Adviser quotes Richard Ellis on the FCA's first public findings against former fund manager Neil Woodford

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Sally Ashford on considerations around power of attorney

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • London’s Knowledge Clusters: From Emerging to Maturing – Start Ups on the Global Stage?

    Lynsey Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Britain's most successful female Olympian has retired at 31, but how does the Family Court treat (early) retirement?

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

  • Fashion and the Green Claims Code brought into focus by open letter from the CMA.

    Ilona Bateson

    Quick Reads

  • How the abolition of Multiple Dwellings Relief affects Build to Rent

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

    Peter Carlyon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts international arbitration event in Dubai

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • It’s not just a High Court decision, it’s a successful M&S High Court Decision

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • 'Saltburn': How the Catton family could have protected the Saltburn estate and could Oliver's inheritance still be contested? (Part 2)

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • 'Saltburn': How the Catton family could have protected the Saltburn estate and could Oliver's inheritance still be contested? (Part 1)

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Beware of not obtaining a court order when settling your finances

    Julia Mauricio

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: when can an enforcement notice against an unlawful use also require the removal of related structures?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Vulnerable elders : a harrowing story and the lessons which need to be learnt

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill: Will new consumer protection rules restrict access to Gift Aid?

    Quick Reads

  • Home buyers and sellers hit by cyber-attack

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • International Relocation: The Parent Trap 25 years on ...

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Statement provides little comfort for farmers and landowners

    Hannah Connors

    Quick Reads

  • Top Tips to Building your Brand - Women in Chancery

    Katelyn Silver

    Quick Reads

Back to top