• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The CMA shining a light on consumer issues in light of Covid-19

As we all know, the current Government restrictions mean that, since March, upcoming events and holidays have had to be cancelled or postponed for an indefinite period of time, leaving both businesses in the retail, leisure and hospitality sector and their customers in a precarious position.  There has been much public discussion and debate in relation to the challenges facing these businesses and the measures introduced to alleviate them; however, this should not detract in any way from consumer rights, which still need to be upheld to the greatest possible extent, even in these exceptional and largely unforeseen circumstances.

This has been recognised by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) which has formed a dedicated Covid-19 Taskforce to investigate and deal with the problems facing consumers as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Based on the complaints received by the Taskforce, the CMA has identified 3 sectors of particular concern:

  • weddings and private events;
  • holiday accommodation; and
  • nurseries and childcare providers.

These industries have been hit particularly hard by the lockdown measures which have meant that their businesses and the services they provide have largely ground to a halt, leaving hundreds of thousands of consumers ‘in the lurch’.  As a result, the main consumer issues identified by the CMA relate to cancellations and refunds, in particular businesses refusing to issue refunds or encouraging customers to accept vouchers instead / making it unduly difficult for consumers to access refunds.

Helpfully, the CMA has issued a statement setting out when a full refund would be expected, namely where:

  • a business has cancelled a contract without providing any of the promised goods or services;
  • no service is provided by a business, for example because this is prevented by the restrictions that apply during the current lockdown; or
  • a consumer cancels or is prevented from receiving the service, for example due to the restrictions that apply during the current lockdown.

This is not intended to be any alteration to the current consumer rights laws (largely contained in the Consumer Rights Act 2015) but rather a summary and reminder of that law. Unfortunately, the findings of the CMA appear to show that some businesses are nevertheless resisting issuing refunds to their consumers in these circumstances, potentially opening themselves up to consumer rights claims.  

Where companies are issuing refunds, the CMA has acknowledged that, in these circumstances, it might take longer than usual to process these.  However, the timeframe should nevertheless be made clear to consumers and given within a reasonable time (although no guidance is given on what might constitute a ‘reasonable’ time). 

Lastly, the CMA has stressed that businesses should not be benefiting from ‘double recovery’ by receiving money via Government schemes as well as from customers.

This CMA Taskforce and Government update shows that consumer rights are still being taken seriously during this pandemic.  In their owns words, if the CMA finds evidence that businesses are failing to comply with consumer protection law then they will “get tough – that means launching enforcement cases and moving to court action where there is a strong reason to do so”.

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for IFA Magazine on risks arising from the intersection of family wealth and commercial lending

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: how to prepare for Martyn’s Law

    Ben Butterworth

    Podcasts

  • The Brocklesby Principle Bites: Occupation Alone Won't Defeat a Lender's Charge

    Lauren Leney

    Quick Reads

  • Iwan Thomas explores Nestlé’s ice cream exit in Food Manufacture

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises TPE on first PISCES share sale: Unlocking Liquidity in Oxford Science Enterprises

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    News

  • The Financial Times quotes Kelvin Tanner on increasing application rates for British citizenship

    Kelvin Tanner

    In the Press

  • Big Changes to Packaging Waste Rules in UK and EU Supply Chains

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

Back to top