• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Intellectual Property update: COVID-19

Deadlines

The coronavirus outbreak has brought huge challenges globally to both individuals and businesses.  Whilst businesses carry on as best they can in these difficult times, there are different strategies being deployed by intellectual property offices for dealing with deadlines including:

UKIPO – requests for extensions of time will be considered “as favourably as possible on a case-by-case basis” and where national and international legislation allows.

EUIPO – all deadlines falling between 9 March and 30 April before the EUIPO have automatically been extended until 1 May 2020. As this is not a working day, deadlines effectively roll to 4 May 2020. This does not apply to deadlines to further appeal Board of Appeal decisions to the General Court, which remain as originally set.

WIPO – deadlines remain as originally set but there are steps that can be taken if deadlines are missed. Evidence for the reason why the deadline was missed may be required.

Other national offices in the EU have varying procedures. In relation to courts, in England, along with both the General Court and Court of Justice of the EU, the deadlines currently remain as set.

Trade mark applications

The pandemic has already spurred a number of filings for trade marks related to COVID-19.

Looking at the digital healthcare industry, Nepesmo Ltd has applied to register the word ‘RemoteCovid’ as a trade mark in the UK. Nepesmo is a company that uses AI-driven self-monitoring to predict and prevent lung attacks. Information about what exactly RemoteCovid may be is not publicly available yet, but Nepesmo’s products use technology such as mobile apps and internet portals to permit patients and their clinicians to monitor their health conditions. Coronavirus is a respiratory disease which would therefore be considered as a lung attack, which may be why it is being considered by Nepesmo. The application was published on 16 March 2020 and the window to oppose it closes on 16 June 2020.

Elsewhere, a sole trader based in Italy, Francesco Pratesi, perhaps in an optimistic spirit, has registered the word ‘COVID-19 SURVIVOR’ in the Benelux. Mr Pratesi supplies retailers in Italy, Europe and the Far East and has registered the mark in Class 25 which covers baseball hats, beanie hats, skiing hats, fashion hats, t-shirts and messages on t-shirts, suggesting that once the virus has passed he hopes to put the mark on clothing products which proud COVID-19 survivors will be able to wear. Although the mark has been registered, the window to oppose it remains open until 25 April 2020 and appears to have already survived one unsuccessful attempt to oppose it.

It goes without saying that these are unprecedented and strange times. However, we are continuing our business as usual, and if you or your business have any intellectual property needs or queries, our team are on hand to assist.

You can find out more on this by listening to our podcast here.

Our thinking

  • Tortious liability: Supreme Court brings relief for directors

    Olivia Gray

    Insights

  • Using Generative AI and staying on the right side of the law

    Rebecca Steer

    Insights

  • World Trademark Review quotes Charlotte Duly on a recent Supreme Court director liability ruling

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Copyright in the Age of AI

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • CDR Magazine quotes Charlotte Duly on the inter partes process for trade mark opposition

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Qatar joins the Madrid Protocol

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Digital Deception: The Rise of Deepfakes

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • Nvidia faces class-action lawsuit for training AI model on ‘shadow library’

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Combatting lookalikes in the light of Thatchers v Aldi

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • World Intellectual Property Review quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s trademark row with Lidl over its Clubcard logo

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • A Modern Marriage: How AI Powered By Blockchain Could Protect IP Rights

    Shennind Awat-Ranai

    Insights

  • Property Patter – Filming Agreements Part 2

    Naomi Nettleton

    Podcasts

  • Rebranding: What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell just as sweet.

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • UK Ruling Revitalizes Discussions On Harmonizing AI And IP

    Nick White

    Insights

  • Nick White writes an opinion piece for City AM on the EU AI Act

    Nick White

    In the Press

  • Nick White and Olivia Gray write for Law360 on a Supreme Court decision on AI and patents

    Nick White

    In the Press

Back to top