• news-banner

    Expert Insights

German constitutional court rules against adoption of UPC, and UK government confirms intention not to participate, but hope remains

At the end of March, the German constitutional court upheld a complaint that the German ratification of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPC Agreement) was unconstitutional. All is not lost, however, as the German government has indicated that it intends to pursue the project in the future.

In 2017, a complaint was filed by a German attorney on the basis that: (1) the ratification of the Agreement was in breach of the German constitution, (2) there is a democratic deficit inherent in the structure of the UPC, (3) the UPC judges lack independence, and (4) the UPC Agreement is irreconcilable with EU law.

The German constitutional court issued its decision on 20 March 2020.  It dismissed the second, third and fourth elements of the complaint, on the grounds that they were inadmissible. However, it held that the ratification of the UPC Agreement was in contravention of the German Basic Law.  Although the bill ratifying the UPC Agreement was adopted unanimously by the German federal parliament, only 38 delegates were present for the vote (out of 709). As a result, this did not provide the two-thirds majority required under the German Basic Law in relation to a decision involving a transfer of sovereignty.  

The decision is a significant setback, as it further delays the introduction of the UPC and Unitary European Patent. It does, however, leave the door open for the adoption of the UPC in the future, provided that it is passed by the necessary majority. In a reaction to the decision the German Minister of Justice and Consumer Protection, Christine Lambrecht, promised to continue to work towards a single European patent and a European Patent Court and to examine the possibility of remedying the lack of form before the end of the current legislative period (which ends in 2021).

Due to the UK’s exit from the EU, and the British government’s decision not to try and pursue participation in the UPC (which was recently confirmed in a letter from the IP Minister to the House of Lords), it is unlikely that the UPC Agreement will come before the German parliament again in its current form.

Without the involvement of the UK, the Unitary Patent and UPC are a less attractive proposition. However, provided that there remains sufficient goodwill towards the project amongst the remaining participating states, the UPC Agreement could be renegotiated so that it does not depend on the involvement of the UK. There may even be an opportunity to address some of the issues that have been flagged in relation to the current Agreement and to widen its scope to allow participation by non-EU states.   

Supporters of the unitary patent and UPC should therefore not entirely despair, but a further delay of at least several years looks likely.

Our thinking

  • A Summer of Sport - Top 5 Legal Considerations

    Anna Sowerby

    Insights

  • Managing IP quotes Charlotte Duly on the Supreme Court SkyKick ruling

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys named ‘UK Trademark Prosecution Firm of the Year’ at the Managing IP Awards 2023

    Mary Bagnall

    News

  • Trade marks: an overview of the registration process

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Nick White on risks to content creators promoting counterfeits

    Nick White

    In the Press

  • ITV This Morning quotes Charlotte Duly on the “Wagatha Christie” trademark

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Wagatha Christie: The Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Sky News quotes Charlotte Duly on Lidl’s trademark win against Tesco

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • UKIPO guidance on NFTs and virtual goods

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • World Intellectual Property Review quotes Charlotte Duly on the Rolex and Oyster & Pop trademark opposition

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Intellectual Property team successfully oppose the registration of a certification mark for Manuka Honey

    Mary Bagnall

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys kickstarts its 'In-House Insights' programme with the first event of the series

    Megan Paul

    News

  • Is it really against the law to share your Netflix password?

    Quick Reads

  • Omnichannel innovation essential in the face of outlet decline

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

  • Verdict quotes Nick White on his cryptocurrency predictions for 2023

    Nick White

    In the Press

  • The 12th Edition of the Nice Classification for Trade Marks includes blockchain goods and services

    Chris Haywood

    Quick Reads

  • Instagram: NFT Factory and Marketplace

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

  • Henry Cuthbert writes for Law in Sport on Usain Bolt's move to trademark his legendary victory celebration

    Henry Cuthbert

    In the Press

  • World Intellectual Property Review quotes Mary Bagnall on the Cadbury trademark win

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Eminem and Snoop Dogg Go Metaverse Live

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • The Legal 500: Intellectual Property Country Comparative Guide

    Mark Hill

    Insights

  • Lesley O'Leary writes for The Law Society Gazette on law firm strategy

    Lesley O’Leary

    In the Press

  • NFTs and the power of licensing

    Chris Haywood

    Quick Reads

  • Strike a Pose - Usain Bolt files legendary victory celebration as a trademark

    Henry Cuthbert

    Quick Reads

  • Retail Bulletin quotes Charlotte Duly on the House of Zana trademark row with Zara

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • The Times quotes Tim Maxwell on replica copies and copyright considerations

    In the Press

  • Protecting a Good Name: Statutory Inquiry into The Captain Tom Foundation

    Verity Heath

    Quick Reads

  • Nick White writes for Sports Business on the new IP laws to help protect Fifa World Cup rights

    Nick White

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys achieves colour trade mark registration for iconic ‘Cadbury Purple’

    Mary Bagnall

    News

  • Top Gun: Maverick studio Paramount sued over alleged copyright breach

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • Charlotte Duly writes for CITMA Review on the China Tang trade mark infringement case

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • The problem of fakes: catching the counterfeiters

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Jamaica becomes a member of the Madrid System

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Media and Entertainment - The Changing Landscape in the Middle East #2: The Digital Context

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • What Lloyd v Google means for Project Red Card

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Can machines be inventors?

    Sonia Kenawy

    Quick Reads

  • The United Arab Emirates Joins the Madrid System

    Lara Haidar

    Quick Reads

  • Bullfighting ... as a copyright work?

    Chris Haywood

    Quick Reads

  • Pfizer, Ted Danson and the Olympic Vaccine Solution

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • #cake – a trial by social media

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

Back to top