• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Captain Tom Moore – a positive pandemic trade mark story

min read

We have previously covered how the COVID19 pandemic led to a flurry of trade mark applications being filed for COVID19 and CORONAVIRUS trade marks (COVID KIDS for clothing being one strange example). Whilst many of these appear to be questionable and remain pending, the recent trade mark applications for various “Tom Moore” marks have been a welcome reminder of the positive stories that emerged from lockdown.

Captain Tom Moore needs no introduction, having vowed to walk 100 lengths of his garden during lockdown for his 100th birthday in order to raise money for the NHS. He completed this feat and, to date, he has raised over £32 million.  Captain Tom has been awarded a knighthood for his fundraising efforts; his official title will be Captain Sir Thomas Moore under Ministry of Defence protocol.

Club Nook Limited, a company run by Captain Tom’s daughter and son-in-law, has filed three UK trade mark applications for CAPTAIN TOM, SIR TOM MOORE and CAPTAIN SIR TOM for a range of goods and services related to his charitable endeavors.

It is certainly a wise move to protect his name.  Whilst Captain Tom is well known for his Herculean fundraising effort, it is not unknown for spurious trade mark applications to be filed covering names in the public eye.  It is much easier, and more cost effective, to make an application in the first instance than attempt to cancel a third party registration or stop their use when they have a trade mark registration in their arsenal and you have an unregistered right that can be time consuming and costly to prove. 

For charities, as for many businesses, their brand is their most important asset and main source of income. A charity’s brand encapsulates the identity of that charitable cause and should be protected with a trade mark registration as a cost effective way of obtaining protection against others using the same brand. Charities have not been immune to third parties imitating them, or selecting a closely similar mark, and unfortunately there will always be unscrupulous parties looking to  profit from the efforts of a third party, including diverting funds destined for a charity.

A registration also allows a charity to license their brand to third parties and more easily control how it is marketed, to ensure the use remains within the core values of the charitable endeavour. A well considered filing strategy should provide good protection for the budget available and provide valuable protection against third parties and act as a vital tool for governing authorised use.

If you would like to discuss any aspect of trade mark protection or enforcement please get in touch with Charlotte at charlotte.duly@crsblaw.com or on +44 (0)20 7203 5105

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Pay Up or We'll Tell All: The High Court's Firm Stance on Blackmail in Privacy Cases

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Infrastructure Projects - Take care when accessing land under statutory powers

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
Back to top