• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Captain Tom Moore – a positive pandemic trade mark story

min read

We have previously covered how the COVID19 pandemic led to a flurry of trade mark applications being filed for COVID19 and CORONAVIRUS trade marks (COVID KIDS for clothing being one strange example). Whilst many of these appear to be questionable and remain pending, the recent trade mark applications for various “Tom Moore” marks have been a welcome reminder of the positive stories that emerged from lockdown.

Captain Tom Moore needs no introduction, having vowed to walk 100 lengths of his garden during lockdown for his 100th birthday in order to raise money for the NHS. He completed this feat and, to date, he has raised over £32 million.  Captain Tom has been awarded a knighthood for his fundraising efforts; his official title will be Captain Sir Thomas Moore under Ministry of Defence protocol.

Club Nook Limited, a company run by Captain Tom’s daughter and son-in-law, has filed three UK trade mark applications for CAPTAIN TOM, SIR TOM MOORE and CAPTAIN SIR TOM for a range of goods and services related to his charitable endeavors.

It is certainly a wise move to protect his name.  Whilst Captain Tom is well known for his Herculean fundraising effort, it is not unknown for spurious trade mark applications to be filed covering names in the public eye.  It is much easier, and more cost effective, to make an application in the first instance than attempt to cancel a third party registration or stop their use when they have a trade mark registration in their arsenal and you have an unregistered right that can be time consuming and costly to prove. 

For charities, as for many businesses, their brand is their most important asset and main source of income. A charity’s brand encapsulates the identity of that charitable cause and should be protected with a trade mark registration as a cost effective way of obtaining protection against others using the same brand. Charities have not been immune to third parties imitating them, or selecting a closely similar mark, and unfortunately there will always be unscrupulous parties looking to  profit from the efforts of a third party, including diverting funds destined for a charity.

A registration also allows a charity to license their brand to third parties and more easily control how it is marketed, to ensure the use remains within the core values of the charitable endeavour. A well considered filing strategy should provide good protection for the budget available and provide valuable protection against third parties and act as a vital tool for governing authorised use.

If you would like to discuss any aspect of trade mark protection or enforcement please get in touch with Charlotte at charlotte.duly@crsblaw.com or on +44 (0)20 7203 5105

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Next Gen Drinks Reception

    Events

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to Spear's on cross-border divorce and succession in Italy

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • General boundaries rule succeeds in boundary dispute between neighbours

    Emma Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • How do the King’s Speech Bills Answer the New Energy Reality?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • ‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ Research & Information Services Team wins BIALL Lexis Nexis Award for Excellence 2026

    Jas Breslin

    News

    min read
  • ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’…But It Might Lose You Money: Conduct in the No-Fault Divorce Era

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Darren Bailey comments in City AM about mandatory release clauses and the future of football transfers

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • US – UK Energy Collaboration

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the shareholders of Pooky Lighting on its acquisition by leading US lighting company Visual Comfort & Co.

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • Welfare always prevails? The implications of A & B v C & D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam) for UK domestic and overseas surrogacy

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • Spear's features William Longrigg's views on potential reforms to the UK family court and the reintroduction of Calderbank offers

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • 5 things English companies and their investors need to know about human rights-related litigation risks

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
Back to top