• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Pharmacy Company Sale - Why are Statutory Registers so important?

Whether you own a pharmacy company or you’re in the process of selling your shares in a pharmacy company, the importance of having and maintaining the company’s statutory registers cannot be overlooked.

The statutory registers, commonly referred to as the statutory books or statutory registers, of a company are extremely important. Every company is required, under the Companies Act 2006, to maintain certain registers regardless of whether the company is privately owned or publicly traded.

Statutory registers are extremely important because they provide the historic and current record of a company’s ownership and all persons responsible for controlling the company and its associated business. Any changes to the information kept in a company’s statutory registers must be updated to ensure its accuracy on any given day.

Statutory Requirements

The Companies Act 2006 states that every company must maintain a Register of Members, Register of Directors, Register of Directors’ Residential Addresses, Register of Secretaries, Register of Debenture Holders and a Register of Persons with Significant Control (a new requirement which came into effect on 6th April 2016). In addition, details of any share allotments and transfers, shareholders’ agreement, directors’ service agreements, statutory accounts along with other corporate documentation such as the company’s certificate of incorporation, board minutes, shareholder resolutions and articles of association should ideally also be stored with the company’s statutory registers.

The statutory registers should be kept either at the company’s registered office or another single appointed location, which must be notified to Companies House and in either case must be made available for inspection at that address by the company’s shareholders who are entitled to inspect the registers upon request and without charge. A failure to make the statutory registers available for inspection is an offence under the Companies Act 2006 as is a failure to comply with a valid request to inspect the statutory registers.

Whilst the maintenance and record keeping of internal statutory registers is somewhat of an archaic requirement, it remains a fineable offence not to comply with the Companies Act 2006. Depending on the information that is missing from the statutory registers, the company and its directors could be fined up to a maximum of £5,000. In addition, a failure to maintain a register of members can lead to a fine of up to £1,000 for each person guilty of an offence as well as the company itself and a further fine will accrue daily until corrected. Whilst these more serious consequences are far less common, it highlights some of the risks that are not always considered.

Prima Facie Evidence

Notwithstanding the potential fines highlighted above, detailed and properly made up registers are essential and may be required in a number of instances, such as challenging or validating share ownership, completing share transfers, inheriting shares, exercising legal rights, verifying or contesting officer misconduct and/or liability, securing investment and providing evidence of a company’s history in order to proceed with the sale of a company. If a company’s statutory registers are inaccurate or missing, then this can cause undesired knock-on effects. If the registers have not been drawn up correctly then, before any errors can be rectified or the register reconstituted, it may be necessary for the company to obtain the approval of the Courts. Not only is this an unwelcome burden if the company is in the process of being sold but any associated Court application to remedy any defect in the registers is likely to be expensive and time consuming.

Not only is maintaining the above registers a legal obligation but having your house in order and maintaining these registers when selling your company is vital. Any purchaser and their legal team will want to inspect the registers to ensure that the proposed sellers have the relevant authority to sell their shares and to enter into the transaction that is contemplated. By law, the register of members is prima facie proof of ownership of the company’s shares. As such, the statutory registers provide any potential buyer with evidence of the company’s share history and failure to supply these could delay the sale and incur time and money being spent on the reconstitution of the registers.

Public Records

It’s a common misconception that the information available on the company’s public records at Companies House is suitable for the purpose of providing evidence of the company’s share history and compliance with its record keeping requirements under the Companies Act 2006. Whilst almost all information contained within the registers is reported in annual confirmation statements (previously known as annual returns) and contained on the company’s public register at Companies House, companies do not have to report share transfers until the next confirmation statement is due. Therefore, certain details on the public records at Companies House may not always provide an accurate reflection of a company’s current position and simply provides a snapshot of a company’s details on one particular day of the year.

Taking Action

Despite the legal requirement and vital importance of maintaining company registers, the reality is that many directors remain unaware of this corporate compliance duty, whilst others simply forget to maintain the registers to ensure that they remain accurate and up to date. Regardless of the reason, failing to keep statutory registers is an offence that can lead to unwanted penalties.

If, as a director, you realise that you have not been keeping company registers, or you discover that they are inaccurate or not up to date, you must rectify this oversight as soon as possible. Likewise, if your original company registers have been lost or destroyed, you should seek to reconstitute them as soon as possible. Depending on your company’s history of ownership and control, this should be a relatively straightforward process.

Even if you are not looking to sell your company, it is important to keep your statutory books up to date. If you are thinking of selling your company at some time in the future, or just want the peace of mind that your company’s registers are accurate and up to date, then its worth contacting a corporate law specialist to assist.

This article was first published on P3 Pharmacy. The above is a general overview and we recommend that independent legal advice is sought for your specific concerns.  If you require further information in relation to the points raised in this article please contact your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2023

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • Arbitration Act 1996: Law Commission recommends limited changes

    Richard Kiddell

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Nortal on its acquisition of Questers

    Hamish Perry

    News

  • Family and Employment law assistance in legal advice deserts

    Sarah Farrelly

    News

  • Property Patter: the latest on the Building Safety Act

    Richard Flenley

    Podcasts

  • James Souter writes for City AM on Meta pulling out of its London office

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its £3.5 million investment into TravelLocal

    David Coates

    News

  • The Evening Standard quotes Rose Carey on the increase in visa fees

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard

    News

  • David Savage writes for Construction News on the upcoming building-control overhaul

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer

    News

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Cara Imbrailo on Rishi Sunak scrapping MEES requirements for residential landlords

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • The Financial Times quotes Emma Humphreys on UK rental costs

    Emma Humphreys

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Key takeaways from the UK Government's "Green Day"

    Martha Glaser

    Quick Reads

  • From Holby City to 5 Fleet Place - David Ames shares his experience of "Behind the Lens" with CRS

    Quick Reads

  • The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 in Action

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • This week in the news: inheritance tax interest costs rising due to Probate delays

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • WhatsAppGate - Should businesses be reviewing their social media policies?

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai announces its plan to streamline the enforcement of civil judgments and arbitral awards

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Time to turn down the lights

    Eddie Richards

    Quick Reads

  • Losing their (Elgin) marbles? British Museum and Greek government fail to reach agreement on the Parthenon sculptures

    Louise Paterson

    Quick Reads

  • Youth Mobility Scheme visa category: now open!

    Kayleigh McKee

    Quick Reads

  • Part 1: The Tip of the Triangle – Examining London’s Potential in the Life Sciences Sector

    Amy Shuttleworth

    Quick Reads

  • Reporting Restriction Order (reprised) - "Where there is no publicity there is no justice."

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Mixed-use development and Sustainability is at the heart of Life Sciences Development

    Fiona Edmond

    Quick Reads

Back to top