• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Succession of a married person: who gets what?

min read

Matrimonial regimes are liquidated on three occasions: divorce, modification of the matrimonial regime and death. Regarding the latter case, many are not aware that the spouses’ matrimonial regime is liquidated before proceeding with succession which has a significant impact on the assets entering the deceased’s estate.

Acquired vs. Individual property

Swiss law distinguishes between ‘acquired property’ (acquêts; Errungenschaft) and ‘individual/personal property’ (biens propres; Eigengut). Acquired property are assets acquired during the marriage for valuable consideration, such as salaries. Personal assets include those accumulated before the marriage or inherited (before or during marriage).

Implication of the matrimonial regime on the succession

If the deceased was married, and depending on the applicable matrimonial regime, his/her spouse will receive (i) part of the assets in the context of the liquidation of the matrimonial regime, and (ii) part of the assets in the succession.

Acquired property regime (participation aux acquêts; Errungenschaftsbeteiligung): this is the de facto regime for spouses domiciled in Switzerland. Upon divorce or death, the assets acquired during the marriage are shared in half.

By entering into a marriage contract, spouses can choose to adopt one of two other available matrimonial regimes: community of property or separation of property.

A marriage contract can be entered into before or after the marriage was celebrated, effectively at any time (but within the limits of the law). A matrimonial property agreement must be made in the form of a deed.

Community of property regime (communauté de biens; Gütergemeinschaft): in the event of a divorce or death, spouses share all their property, whether personal or acquired during their marriage. In practice, this regime is fairly uncommon – less than 1% of couples are married under this regime.

Separation of property regime (séparation de biens; Gütertrennung): each spouse keeps his/her property separate, i.e. retains ownership, management and use of his/her own assets. In the event of divorce or death, each spouse takes back his/her assets.

The matrimonial regime chosen by the parties therefore has a significant impact on the assets entering the estate.

As a general rule: if the community of property regime greatly favours the surviving spouse, the separation of property regime favours the deceased’s other heirs (such as his/her children).

By way of example: A and B were married and had two common children. A dies. Assume that A did not make any testamentary dispositions, and half the estate is left to the surviving spouse B. See graphics for the implications in the three different matrimonial regimes here.

Acquired property regime

acquired_property_Infographic.jpg

 

Community of property regime

community_of_property_Infographic.jpg

 

Separation of property regime

separation_of_property_ Infographic.jpg

For more information, please contact Sirin Yüce at sirin.yuce@crsblaw.com or Joanna Metaxas at joanna.metaxas@crsblaw.com

Our thinking

  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints First Corporate Tax Partner in Milan

    Michael Lingens

    News

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi writes for We Wealth on family pacts and intra-family corporate restructuring

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • After You Leave: Navigating Non-Competes and Non-Solicitation Under Swiss Law

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Turning the Trust Tables

    Jonathan Burt

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi writes for We Wealth, considering circumstances where the right to reduce inheritance applies

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in The Telegraph on HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Miranda Fisher and Hannah Owen write in the Daily Mail's This is Money section on whether you can divorce your parents

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Benoît Pasquier comments in Law UK on Switzerland as a leading centre for sports disputes

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

    min read
  • Faster Company Formation: Share Capital Can Now Be Paid After Incorporation

    Victor Regnard

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Under Oath – Not Under Attack: A practical guide on how to give evidence in the Family Court

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Tamasin Perkins comments in Today's Family Lawyer on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

    min read
  • Middle East conflict: Employees coming to the UK

    Caroline Belam

    Insights

    min read
  • Dubai, Divorce and the Children Caught in Between

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Disputes Over Donuts: Dawn Raids – Preparation, Response and What to Expect

    Jonathan Huth

    Podcasts

  • Lend in Haste, Repent at Leisure: Loans and Trusts – UK Tax Traps

    Alice Martin

    Insights

    min read
  • Michael Wells-Greco comments in the BBC on a Supreme Court adoption ruling

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

    min read
  • Nicola Thorpe and Sally Ashford comment in Law.com International on the importance of trusted, long term relationships in advising high-net-worth clients

    Nicola Thorpe

    In the Press

    min read
  • Protecting what matters: Your guide to wills and Powers of Attorney

    Abbie Hook

    Insights

    min read
  • Thomas Moran comments in eprivateclient on the proposed pied-à-terre tax in New York and how it compares to similar measures previously introduced in the prime property London market

    Thomas Moran

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top