• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Music to our ears? Well, perhaps not for Apple.

A feud first began when the music streaming giant, Spotify, filed a complaint against music streaming provider, and competitor, Apple Inc back in 2019. Spotify accused Apple’s App Store for providing policies that suppressed the competition in music streaming services. Tension had continued to build due to a competing desire to champion vodcast streaming, however, it finally came to a head on Friday when the European Commission issued its formal antitrust charges against Apple over concerns about the company’s App Store practices. 

The European Commission: Charges 

The European Commission stated that Apple’s dominant position in the market for distribution of music streaming apps through its App Store had enabled it to manipulate competition in the market. The Commission submitted to Apple a statement of objections, which set out how it believed Apple had violated the competition rules and why the tech giant needed to be placed under the antitrust microscope.

The Commission's main charges and antitrust concerns centre upon the two following issues:

  1. The mandatory use of Apple’s in-app purchase system (whereby Apple charges a 30 percent cut). This is also referred to by many critics as the ‘Apple Tax’. This has been deemed to create barriers to competition and has resulted in consumers looking more favourably towards Apple’s own App offerings.
  2. Apple’s misuse of anti-steering provisions. This rule prevents an app developer from informing users of other purchasing options (which may be cheaper); thus limiting them to Apple’s own in-app payment system. 

According to the European Commission, most streaming providers would pass on a fee to end users by raising prices however, in Apple’s case, it  had distorted competition in the market for music streaming services by raising the costs of competing music streaming app developers. As a result, it caused the music subscriptions on IOS devices to be more expensive to consumers. 

Apple: An Internet Gatekeeper?

App stores are a key feature of our digital economy. They allow consumers to shop, read the news, access movies and music via apps instead of having to access them directly through websites. Apple Apps Store has been considered the gatekeeper to users of Apple’s iPhones and iPads. As such, it is expected practice that Apple should offer a fair choice to all consumers; to enable a level playing field for all app developers. However, Apple has been criticised for distorting competition; enabling them to achieve an unfair advantage. 

Apple however, argues that its App Store does no such thing. In comparison to Google’s monster Android OS, Apple stated it’s IOS global market share is little over 10% and rebuffs the Commission's beliefs that it is monopolising the market. Apple also stipulated that Spotify already activates 99% of its paid subscriptions outside its App Store, but that it failed to provide a breakdown for iPhone and iPad subscriptions alone. Having said this, competition regulators have looked at the relevant market for “IOS apps” and have found that Apple have the ability to monopolise 100% of their sale and distribution; thus giving it the requisite control over the market. 

Violation of Antitrust rules

Should Apple be found guilty of violating the EU antitrust rules, the EU could impose a fine of up to 10 percent of its annual revenue, which, on the basis of Apple’s annual revenue of $274.5 billion last year, could reach $27 billion. It could also lead to changes in the tech giant’s business practices to allow for greater competition. However, this is not a closed case. Apple will have a chance to respond to the European Commission’s list of objections over the course of the next 12 weeks. We will therefore have to wait and see what the outcome will be. 

Comments

Although the recent charges only relate to the music streaming apps, there is already noise that Apple may be pursued on other other App platforms, including Apple E-books and Apple Pay. 

It is important to consider this case as one that represents all music streaming platforms, not just Spotify.  Should Apple’s investigation result in disciplinary action, we may soon see the introduction of tougher regulatory compliance to help level out the playing field and invite competition from smaller companies. It may allow competitors, such as Soundcloud and Deezer, an opportunity to present their offerings and engage with us as their customers; widening the market spectrum.

Our thinking

  • Doing business in the UAE & Israel

    William Reichert

    Events

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Silicon quotes Gareth Mills on the UK consumer lawsuit against Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Bloomberg and The Washington Post quote Richard Davies on multiclub ownership in world sports

    Richard Davies

    In the Press

  • Product compliance and Brexit - UK Government concedes to CE markings indefinite recognition

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • UAE and the Grey List: Brief Update

    Karl Masi

    Insights

  • A Summer of Sport - Top 5 Legal Considerations

    Anna Sowerby

    Insights

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • The Express quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s report on competition in the groceries sector

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Reuters quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s deadline extension of the Microsoft Activision Blizzard deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Les défaillances en France proches de leur niveau de 2019 - French insolvencies close to 2019 levels

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Law.com International quotes Simon Ridpath on the use of AI in the legal sector

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

  • Casino Group: An agreement with investors and debt holders is expected at the end of July

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Raconteur quotes Caroline Swain on misleading pricing practices

    Caroline Swain

    In the Press

  • DIAC Issues First Annual Report

    Georgia Fullarton

    Quick Reads

  • PE Hub quotes Richard Davies on private equity interest in football and sports

    Richard Davies

    In the Press

  • Payment Expert quotes Janine Regan on the record £1bn fine against Meta over EU data protection violations

    Janine Regan

    In the Press

  • The Guardian quotes Gareth Mills on Microsoft lodging an appeal against the CMA’s decision to block its Activision Blizzard deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the EU’s approval of the Microsoft-Activision deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • One year on: "Influencer Culture: lights, camera, inaction" remains astonishingly accurate

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

  • UKTN quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA's review of the UK AI market

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration publishes new Arbitration Rules

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • The Financial Times quotes Nick White on risks to content creators promoting counterfeits

    Nick White

    In the Press

  • The Daily Telegraph quotes Nick White on AI and 'workplace displacement'

    Nick White

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys achieves record success in The Legal 500 2023 EMEA directory

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

  • EGR Global quotes Richard Davies on the landmark decision to withdraw front-of-shirt sponsorship by 2026

    Richard Davies

    In the Press

  • Charles Mallows writes for City AM on the impracticality of a slowdown in AI development

    Charles Mallows

    In the Press

  • WhatsAppGate - Should businesses be reviewing their social media policies?

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai announces its plan to streamline the enforcement of civil judgments and arbitral awards

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Sign of the times - the British record football transfer which very nearly didn't happen

    Pei Li Kew

    Quick Reads

  • No love (island) lost for the #muffboss – #ad is great but don’t forget the other ad rules

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

  • Is it really against the law to share your Netflix password?

    Quick Reads

  • Omnichannel innovation essential in the face of outlet decline

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

  • Brand owners now required to police influencers

    Katie Bewick

    Quick Reads

  • Ten Years Since The 2012 Saudi Arbitration Law: Where Are We Now?

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Strike a Pose - Usain Bolt files legendary victory celebration as a trademark

    Henry Cuthbert

    Quick Reads

  • ITV takes the plunge and “couples up” with Ebay to dress love island contestants in pre-loved clothing

    Natalie Batra

    Quick Reads

  • Constructing a Blue-print for Electronic Execution – New Guidance from the Industry Working Group on the Electronic Execution of Documents

    Quentin de la Bastide

    Quick Reads

  • To flex or not to flex: comparing traditional offices with flexible office space

    Emma Preece

    Quick Reads

  • PRA to further scrutinise cloud computing in 2022

    Mark Bailey

    Quick Reads

Back to top