• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Counterfeit goods – online platforms and luxury brands take a new collaborative approach

min read

Online retail has been increasing for the best part of a decade due to a shift in consumer behaviour and even more so during the Covid-19 pandemic with high street and luxury brands forced to close their doors to comply with government restrictions.

Naturally with the increase in online retail comes the inevitable risk of potentially purchasing counterfeit goods. Infringers will attempt to sell their counterfeit goods through well-respected and extremely popular online platforms, such as Amazon, eBay and Facebook, as third party sellers.

Last month, it was reported that social media platform, Facebook, and luxury brand, Gucci, have filed a joint lawsuit in California against a counterfeiter who had allegedly been using Facebook and Instagram accounts to sell counterfeit Gucci products. This joint lawsuit follows numerous attempts by the platform to take down over 100 Facebook and Instagram accounts, which repeatedly kept reappearing.

The lawsuit is based on the unauthorised use of various trade mark registrations owned by Gucci. The famous trade marks were applied to inferior quality goods and made available for sale on the social media platform. Such activity is also in breach of Facebook’s terms of use. The acts of the counterfeiter ultimately resulted in misleading the public as to the origin, and quality, of the goods.

Commentary:

Due to the increase in online retail and the various different retail channels available to consumers, brands will want to protect and preserve their reputation as much as possible in the midst of this change in consumer behaviour. As such, it is so important (now more than ever) for brands to be vigilant and, where necessary, take action against counterfeiters to protect their reputation and value in their brand.

This joint action filed with Gucci is a first for Facebook, although Amazon has already taken such an approach with filing lawsuits along with luxury brands such as Valentino and Ferragamo. This strong, collaborative approach shows a shift in the attitude of dealing with online counterfeit goods.

It has not been uncommon to see luxury brands taking action against online platforms for not preventing the sale of counterfeit goods, but now efforts appear to be turning towards the counterfeiters themselves. Arguably, not a surprising shift in approach to counterfeit goods by brands themselves, but what is surprising is the shift in action of the online platforms. In the past, submitting takedown notices to the platforms would be the normal course of action, however, due to the now modernised, sophisticated counterfeiter, it looks like the mere use of takedowns is not enough.

Online platforms are now under more pressure to be more proactive in their approach to tackling the ever-escalating issue of counterfeit goods, particularly in the US, which this lawsuit demonstrates. There has been some increase in pressure over the last decade from the EU Commission, which adopted two reports concerning Memoranda of Understandings, which requested signatories (including online platforms and rights holders) to adopt certain measures and ‘enhanced co-operation’ with authorities, in order to tackle the issue of counterfeit goods online. However, it would certainly be interesting to see whether such pressures mount in the UK and EU following the outcome of this case in the US and whether such joint actions will become prevalent going forward.

Watch this space!

Our thinking

  • Switzerland plans further restrictions to buying real estate

    Oliver Schreier

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Navigating the Rise of AI-Generated DSARs and complaints – our top tips

    Janine Regan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Motorsport Races – Top Legal Considerations

    Anna Sowerby

    Insights

    min read
  • IT Services Roundtable Summary Note

    Mark Howard

    Insights

    min read
  • Internet Retailing quotes Rachel Bell on advertising restrictions for foods high in fat, salt and sugar

    Rachel Bell

    In the Press

    min read
  • Corporate restructuring: Preparing for Future Challenges

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

    min read
  • Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

    Willemijn Paul

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens its position in the latest Legal 500 EMEA directory, with 22 firm rankings

    News

    min read
  • Smaller appetites, bigger shifts: GLP‑1 is reshaping UK retail and M&A

    Iwan Thomas

    Insights

    min read
  • How Stakeholder Engagement and Grievance Mechanisms Strengthen Human Rights Due Diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hires first IT, Data and AI Partner with leading digital health expertise in Paris

    Marguerite Brac de La Perrière

    News

    min read
  • Understanding risk-based human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

    min read
  • Big Changes to Packaging Waste Rules in UK and EU Supply Chains

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

    min read
  • Dubai Courts Enable Private Enforcement of Court Orders

    Maher Al Nashar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Supply chain and ESG data requests

    Megan Gray

    Insights

    min read
  • Contracting for Effective Human Rights Due Diligence Takeaways

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

    min read
Back to top